39741Case T-583/17: Judgment of the General Court of 12 June 2019 — EOS Deutscher Inkasso-Dienst v EUIPO — IOS Finance EFC (IOS FINANCE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark IOS FINANCE — Earlier national figurative mark EOS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 12 juin 2019
39742Case T-167/17: Judgment of the General Court of 12 June 2019 — RV v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Article 42c of the Staff Regulations — Leave in the interests of the service — Automatic retirement — Measure not open to challenge — Partial inadmissibility — Scope of the law — Court acting of its own motion — Literal, contextual and teleological interpretation)cjeu_case · 12 juin 2019
39743Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 12 juin 2019.#Patent-och registreringsverket contre Mats Hansson.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Marques – Directive 2008/95/CE – Article 4, paragraphe 1, sous b) – Risque de confusion – Impression d’ensemble – Marque antérieure enregistrée avec une déclaration de renonciation – Effets d’une telle renonciation sur l’étendue de la protection de la marque antérieure.#Affaire C-705/17.cjeu_case · 12 juin 2019
39744Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 June 2019.#Patent-och registreringsverket v Mats Hansson.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Trade marks — Directive 2008/95/EC — Article 4(1)(b) — Likelihood of confusion — Overall impression — Earlier trade mark registered with a disclaimer — Effects of such a disclaimer on the extent of protection of the earlier trade mark.#Case C-705/17.cjeu_case · 12 juin 2019
39745Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 12 juin 2019.#Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów contre Orange Polska S.A.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Directive 2005/29/CE – Pratiques commerciales déloyales des entreprises à l’égard des consommateurs – Notion de “pratique commerciale agressive” – Obligation du consommateur de prendre une décision commerciale finale en présence du coursier qui lui remet les conditions générales du contrat.#Affaire C-628/17.cjeu_case · 12 juin 2019
39746Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 June 2019.#Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów v Orange Polska S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2005/29/EC — Unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices — Concept of an aggressive commercial practice — Consumer required to take a final transactional decision in the presence of the courier handing over the general terms and conditions of the contract.#Case C-628/17.cjeu_case · 12 juin 2019
39747Case C-705/17: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt — Sweden) — Patent- och registreringsverket v Mats Hansson (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Trade marks — Directive 2008/95/EC — Article 4(1)(b) — Likelihood of confusion — Overall impression — Earlier trade mark registered with a disclaimer — Effects of such a disclaimer on the extent of protection of the earlier trade mark)cjeu_case · 12 juin 2019
39748Case C-628/17: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy — Poland) — Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów v Orange Polska S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2005/29/EC — Unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices — Concept of an aggressive commercial practice — Consumer required to take a final transactional decision in the presence of the courier handing over the general terms and conditions of the contract)cjeu_case · 12 juin 2019
39749Case T-354/19: Action brought on 11 June 2019 — Palacio Domecq v EUIPO — Domecq Bodega Las Copas (PALACIO DOMECQ 1778)cjeu_case · 11 juin 2019
39750Case T-350/19: Action brought on 11 June 2019 — Bontempi and Others v EUIPO — Sand Cph (WhiteSand)cjeu_case · 11 juin 2019
39751Case C-447/19 P: Appeal brought on 11 June 2019 by SA Close, Cegelec against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 9 April 2019 in Case T-259/15, Close and Cegelec v Parliamentcjeu_case · 11 juin 2019
39752Case C-444/19 P: Appeal brought on 11 June 2019 by Kiku GmbH against the judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 11 April 2019 in Case T-765/17, Kiku GmbH v Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO)cjeu_case · 11 juin 2019
39753Case C-439/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Satversmes tiesa (Latvia) lodged on 11 June 2019 — B v Latvijas Republikas Saeimacjeu_case · 11 juin 2019
39754Case C-438/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 11 June 2019 — Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. v Frontline Digital GmbHcjeu_case · 11 juin 2019
39755Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 June 2019.#Sigrid Dickmanns v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Civil service — Temporary staff — Fixed-term contract with a termination clause — Clause terminating the contract in the event that the name of the agent is not included on the reserve list of a competition — Purely confirmatory measure — Period within which an action must be brought — Inadmissibility.#Case T-538/18.cjeu_case · 11 juin 2019
39756Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 June 2019.#Fernando De Esteban Alonso v European Commission.#Civil service — Former officials — Investigation by OLAF — ‘Eurostat’ case — Forwarding to the national judicial authorities of information concerning matters liable to result in criminal proceedings — Failure to inform in advance the officials potentially concerned — Damage allegedly sustained as a result of the conduct of OLAF and the Commission in the course of the proceedings — Non-material, physical and material harm — Causal link.#Case T-138/18.cjeu_case · 11 juin 2019
39757Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 June 2019.#Fernando De Esteban Alonso v European Commission.#Civil service — Former officials — Investigation by OLAF — ‘Eurostat’ case — Forwarding to the national judicial authorities of information concerning matters liable to result in criminal proceedings — Failure to inform in advance the officials potentially concerned — Damage allegedly sustained as a result of the conduct of OLAF and the Commission in the course of the proceedings — Non-material, physical and material harm — Causal link.#Case T-138/18.cjeu_case · 11 juin 2019
39758Case T-538/18: Order of the General Court of 11 June 2019 — Dickmanns v EUIPO (Civil service — Temporary staff — Fixed-term contract with a termination clause — Clause terminating the contract in the event that the name of the agent is not included on the reserve list of a competition — Purely confirmatory measure — Period within which an action must be brought — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 11 juin 2019
39759Case T-138/18: Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2019 — De Esteban Alonso v Commission (Civil Service — Former officials — OLAF investigation — ‘Eurostat’ case — Forwarding to the national judicial authorities of information relating to matters liable to result in criminal proceedings — Failure to notify potentially concerned officials beforehand — Harm allegedly suffered on account of the conduct of OLAF and the Commission during the proceedings — Material, non-material and physical harm — Causal link)cjeu_case · 11 juin 2019
39760Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 11 June 2019.#Nationale Maatschappij der Belgische Spoorwegen (NMBS) v Mbutuku Kanyeba and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Vredegerecht te Antwerpen.#References for a preliminary ruling — Rail transport — Passengers’ rights and obligations — Regulation (EC) No 1371/2007 — Article 3(8) — Transport contract — Concept — Passenger without a ticket at the time of boarding a train — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13/EEC — Article 1(2) and Article 6(1) — General conditions of carriage of a railway undertaking — Mandatory statutory or regulatory provisions — Penalty clause — Powers of the national court.#Joined Cases C-349/18 to C-351/18.cjeu_case · 11 juin 2019