Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
17741

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#LM v KP.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – EU trade mark – Dispute before the national court – Jurisdiction of EU trade mark courts – Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 124 – Action for infringement – Article 128 – Counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity – Subject matter of that counterclaim – Article 129(3) – Rules of procedure governing the same type of action relating to a national trade mark – Principle of procedural autonomy.#Case C-654/21.

cjeu_case ·
17742

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 8 juin 2023.#SC Zes Zollner Electronic SRL contre Direcţia Regională Vamală Cluj – Biroul Vamal de Frontieră Aeroport Cluj Napoca.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Union douanière – Règlement (UE) no°952/2013 – Code des douanes de l’Union – Quantité excédentaire de marchandises découverte après l’octroi de la mainlevée des marchandises – Article 173 – Rectification d’une déclaration en douane – Marchandises autres que celles qui ont fait initialement l’objet de la déclaration à rectifier – Article 174 – Invalidation d’une déclaration en douane – Article 42 – Sanctions infligées par les autorités douanières compétentes – Règlement délégué (UE) 2015/2446.#Affaire C-640/21.

cjeu_case ·
17743

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#SC Zes Zollner Electronic SRL v Direcţia Regională Vamală Cluj – Biroul Vamal de Frontieră Aeroport Cluj Napoca.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Cluj.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Union Customs Code – Excess quantity of goods discovered after the release of the goods – Article 173 – Amendment of a customs declaration – Goods other than those originally covered by the declaration to amend – Article 174 – Invalidation of a customs declaration – Article 42 – Penalties imposed by the customs authorities responsible – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446.#Case C-640/21.

cjeu_case ·
17744

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 8 juin 2023.#NN contre Regione Lombardia.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Agriculture – Organisation commune des marchés – Règlement (UE) no 1308/2013 – Article 220 – Mesures de soutien du marché liées aux maladies animales – Règlement d’exécution (UE) 2019/1323 – Mesures exceptionnelles de soutien du marché pour les secteurs des œufs et de la viande de volaille en Italie – Réglementation nationale – Condition d’octroi d’une aide – Opérateurs agricoles en activité sur le marché en question à la date du dépôt de la demande – Marge d’appréciation des États membres.#Affaire C-636/21.

cjeu_case ·
17745

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#NN v Regione Lombardia.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common organisation of the markets – Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Article 220 – Market support measures related to animal diseases – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1323 – Exceptional market support measures for the eggs and poultrymeat sectors in Italy – National legislation – Condition for the granting of aid – Farmers operational on the market in question on the date of submission of the application – Discretion of the Member States.#Case C-636/21.

cjeu_case ·
17748

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 8 juin 2023.#BNP Paribas SA contre TR.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile et commerciale – Règlement (CE) no 44/2001 – Articles 33 et 36 – Reconnaissance d’une décision rendue dans un État membre – Invocation de façon incidente devant une juridiction d’un autre État membre – Effets produits par cette décision dans l’État d’origine – Recevabilité d’une action introduite dans l’État membre requis postérieurement à ladite décision – Règles de procédure nationales imposant la concentration des demandes au sein d’une seule instance.#Affaire C-567/21.

cjeu_case ·
17749

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#BNP Paribas SA v TR.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 – Articles 33 and 36 – Recognition of a judgment given in another Member State – Question raised incidentally before the courts of another Member State – Effects produced by that judgment in the State of origin – Admissibility of an action brought in the Member State addressed after that judgment – National procedural rules imposing the concentration of claims in a single set of proceedings.#Case C-567/21.

cjeu_case ·
17750

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#Azienda Nazionale Autonoma Strade SpA (ANAS) v Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – European Union Structural Funds – Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 – Article 2(7) – Concept of ‘irregularity’ – Article 98(1) and (2) – Financial corrections by Member States in connection with irregularities detected – Criteria to be applied – Directive 2004/18/EC – Point (d) of the first subparagraph of Article 45(2) – Concept of ‘grave professional misconduct’.#Case C-545/21.

cjeu_case ·
17751

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#Azienda Nazionale Autonoma Strade SpA (ANAS) v Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – European Union Structural Funds – Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 – Article 2(7) – Concept of ‘irregularity’ – Article 98(1) and (2) – Financial corrections by Member States in connection with irregularities detected – Criteria to be applied – Directive 2004/18/EC – Point (d) of the first subparagraph of Article 45(2) – Concept of ‘grave professional misconduct’.#Case C-545/21.

cjeu_case ·
17752

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 8 juin 2023.#Commission européenne contre République slovaque.#Manquement d’État – Voyages à forfait et prestations de voyage liées – Directive (UE) 2015/2302 – Article 12, paragraphes 2 à 4 – Résiliation d’un contrat de voyage à forfait – Circonstances exceptionnelles et inévitables – Pandémie de COVID-19 – Remboursement des paiements effectués par le voyageur concerné au titre d’un forfait – Remboursement sous la forme d’une somme d’argent ou sous la forme d’un voyage à forfait de remplacement – Obligation de rembourser ce voyageur 14 jours au plus tard après la résiliation du contrat concerné – Dérogation temporaire à cette obligation.#Affaire C-540/21.

cjeu_case ·
17753

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#European Commission v Slovak Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Package travel and linked travel arrangements – Directive (EU) 2015/2302 – Article 12(2) to (4) – Termination of a package travel contract – Unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances – COVID-19 pandemic – Refund of payments made by the traveller for the package – Refund in the form of a sum of money or in the form of a replacement package tour – Obligation to provide that traveller with a refund not later than 14 days after the relevant contract is terminated – Temporary derogation from that obligation.#Case C-540/21.

cjeu_case ·
17754

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 8 juin 2023.#OZ contre Lyoness Europe AG.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Directive 93/13/CEE – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Article 2, sous b) – Notion de “consommateur” – Contrat portant sur l’affiliation à un système de fidélisation permettant d’obtenir certains avantages financiers lors de l’acquisition de biens et de services auprès de commerçants tiers.#Affaire C-455/21.

cjeu_case ·
17755

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#OZ v Lyoness Europe AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Olt.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 2(b) – Definition of ‘consumer’ – Contract for membership of a loyalty scheme enabling certain financial benefits to be obtained when purchasing goods and services from third-party traders.#Case C-455/21.

cjeu_case ·
17758

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#Union fédérale des consommateurs - Que choisir (UFC - Que choisir) and Consommation, logement et cadre de vie (CLCV) v Premier ministre and Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Relance.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Package travel and linked travel arrangements – Directive (EU) 2015/2302 – Article 12(2) to (4) – Termination of a package travel contract – Unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances – COVID-19 pandemic – Refund of payments made by the traveller concerned for a package – Refund in the form of a sum of money or equivalent refund in the form of a credit note (‘voucher’) – Obligation to provide that traveller with a refund not later than 14 days after the relevant contract is terminated – Temporary derogation from that obligation – Adjustment of the temporal effects of a decision taken in accordance with national law annulling national legislation that is contrary to that obligation.#Case C-407/21.

cjeu_case ·
17759

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#Union fédérale des consommateurs - Que choisir (UFC - Que choisir) and Consommation, logement et cadre de vie (CLCV) v Premier ministre and Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Relance.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Package travel and linked travel arrangements – Directive (EU) 2015/2302 – Article 12(2) to (4) – Termination of a package travel contract – Unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances – COVID-19 pandemic – Refund of payments made by the traveller concerned for a package – Refund in the form of a sum of money or equivalent refund in the form of a credit note (‘voucher’) – Obligation to provide that traveller with a refund not later than 14 days after the relevant contract is terminated – Temporary derogation from that obligation – Adjustment of the temporal effects of a decision taken in accordance with national law annulling national legislation that is contrary to that obligation.#Case C-407/21.

cjeu_case ·
17760

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#Prestige and Limousine, S.L. v Área Metropolitana de Barcelona and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 49 TFEU – Article 107(1) TFEU – Private-hire vehicles (PHVs) – Licencing scheme involving the issue, in addition to a licence to provide urban and interurban transport services throughout the national territory, of a second operating licence in order to be able to provide urban transport services in a metropolitan area – Limitation of the number of licences for PHV services to one thirtieth of the licences for taxi services.#Case C-50/21.

cjeu_case ·