39861Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 June 2019.#Wilo Salmson France SAS v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală - Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti and Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală - Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti - Administraţia Fiscală pentru Contribuabili Nerezidenţi.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Lack of sufficient information regarding the factual and legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-10/19.cjeu_case · 5 juin 2019
39862Case C-435/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 5 June 2019 — Agenzia delle entrate — Riscossione v Poste Italiane SpAcjeu_case · 5 juin 2019
39863Case C-434/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 5 June 2019 — Poste Italiane SpA v Riscossione Sicilia SpA — tax-collection agency for the province of Palermo and the other provinces of Sicilycjeu_case · 5 juin 2019
39864Case C-432/19 P: Appeal brought on 5 June 2019 by Inpost S.A. against the judgment of the General Court delivered on 19 March 2019 in Joined Cases T-282/16 and T-283/16 Inpost Paczkomaty and Inpost v Commissioncjeu_case · 5 juin 2019
39865Case C-431/19 P: Appeal brought on 5 June 2019 by Inpost Paczkomaty sp. z o.o. against the judgment of the General Court delivered on 19 March 2019 in Joined Cases T-282/16 and T-283/16 Inpost Paczkomaty and Inpost v Commissioncjeu_case · 5 juin 2019
39866Case C-429/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Koblenz (Germany) lodged on 5 June 2019 — Remondis GmbH v Abfallzweckverband Rhein-Mosel-Eifelcjeu_case · 5 juin 2019
39867Case C-244/19: Order of the President of the Court of 5 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien — Austria) — GB v Decker KFZ-Handels u. -Reparatur GmbH, Volkswagen AGcjeu_case · 5 juin 2019
39868Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 5 June 2019.#Belén Bernaldo de Quirós v European Commission.#Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary measures — Disciplinary procedure — Acts contrary to the dignity of the civil service — Administrative investigation — Mandate given to IDOC — Principle of impartiality — Principle of good administration — Rights of the defence — Disciplinary procedure — Principle of equality of arms — Disciplinary penalty of a reprimand — Proportionality — Non-material damage.#Case T-273/18.cjeu_case · 5 juin 2019
39869Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 5 June 2019.#EBM Technologies, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark MobiPACS — Absolute ground for refusal — Slogan — Level of attention of the relevant public — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-272/18.cjeu_case · 5 juin 2019
39870Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 5 June 2019.#Biolatte Oy v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Biolatte — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-229/18.cjeu_case · 5 juin 2019
39871Case T-273/18: Judgment of the General Court of 5 June 2019 — Bernaldo de Quirós v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary measures — Disciplinary procedure — Acts contrary to the dignity of the civil service — Administrative investigation — Mandate given to IDOC — Principle of impartiality — Principle of good administration — Rights of the defence — Disciplinary procedure — Principle of equality of arms — Disciplinary penalty of a reprimand — Proportionality — Non-material damage)cjeu_case · 5 juin 2019
39872Case T-272/18: Judgment of the General Court of 5 June 2019 — EBM Technologies v EUIPO (MobiPACS) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark MobiPACS — Absolute ground for refusal — Slogan — Level of attention of the relevant public — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 5 juin 2019
39873Case T-229/18: Judgment of the General Court of 5 June 2019 — Biolatte v EUIPO (Biolatte) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark Biolatte — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 5 juin 2019
39874Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 5 juin 2019.#Skype Communications Sàrl contre Institut belge des services postaux et des télécommunications (IBPT).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Réseaux et services de communications électroniques – Directive 2002/21/CE – Article 2, sous c) – Notion de “service de communications électroniques” – Transmission de signaux – Service de voix sur le protocole Internet (VoIP) vers des numéros de téléphone fixes ou mobiles – Service SkypeOut.#Affaire C-142/18.cjeu_case · 5 juin 2019
39875Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 June 2019.#Skype Communications Sàrl v Institut belge des services postaux et des télécommunications (IBPT).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/21/EC — Article 2(c) — Notion of ‘electronic communications service’ — Transmission of signals — Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) service to fixed or mobile telephone numbers — SkypeOut service.#Case C-142/18.cjeu_case · 5 juin 2019
39876Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 5 June 2019.#Glencore Agriculture Hungary Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC– Articles 167 and 168 — Right to deduct VAT — Refusal — Fraud — Taking of evidence — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Access to the file — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Effective judicial review — Principle of equality of arms — Inter partes principle — National legislation or practice according to which, when checking the right to deduct VAT exercised by a taxable person, the tax authorities are bound by the findings of fact and the legal classifications which they have made in the context of related administrative procedures to which that taxable person was not a party.#Case C-189/18.cjeu_case · 5 juin 2019
39877Case C-142/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the cour d’appel de Bruxelles — Belgium) — Skype Communications Sàrl v Institut belge des services postaux et des télécommunications (IBPT) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/21/EC — Article 2(c) — Notion of ‘electronic communications service’ — Transmission of signals — Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) service to fixed or mobile telephone numbers — SkypeOut service)cjeu_case · 5 juin 2019
39878Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 5 June 2019.#Sergio Siragusa v Council of the European Union.#Civil service — Officials — Leaving the service — Request to retire — Amendment of the Staff Regulations after that request had been made — Withdrawal of an earlier decision — Liability.#Case T-616/17 RENV.cjeu_case · 5 juin 2019
39879Case T-616/17 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 5 June 2019 — Siragusa v Council (Civil service — Officials — Leaving the service — Request to retire — Amendment of the Staff Regulations after that request had been made — Withdrawal of an earlier decision — Liability)cjeu_case · 5 juin 2019
39880Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 5 juin 2019.#GT contre HS.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Directive 93/13/CEE – Article 3, paragraphe 1 – Article 4, paragraphe 2 – Article 6, paragraphe 1 – Contrat de prêt libellé en devise étrangère – Communication au consommateur du taux de change applicable à la somme mise à disposition en monnaie nationale après la conclusion du contrat.#Affaire C-38/17.cjeu_case · 5 juin 2019