3821Case T-703/25: Action brought on 15 October 2025 – Sabormex v EUIPO – Tierra Brands España (TIERRA GARAT MÉXICO ES CAFÉ Y CHOCOLATE)cjeu_case · 15 октября 2025 г.
3822Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 15 October 2025.#Galina Evgenyevna Pumpyanskaya v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘benefiting from leading businesspersons operating in Russia’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Directive 2014/145 – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-235/25.cjeu_case · 15 октября 2025 г.
3823Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 15 October 2025.#Galina Evgenyevna Pumpyanskaya v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘benefiting from leading businesspersons operating in Russia’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Directive 2014/145 – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-235/25.cjeu_case · 15 октября 2025 г.
3824Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 15 October 2025.#Bulkhead Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark WARDOGS – Earlier EU word mark WATCH DOGS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-109/25.cjeu_case · 15 октября 2025 г.
3825Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 15 October 2025.#Bulkhead Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark WARDOGS – Earlier EU word mark WATCH DOGS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-109/25.cjeu_case · 15 октября 2025 г.
3826Case T-235/25: Judgment of the General Court of 15 October 2025 – Pumpyanskaya v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of benefiting from leading businesspersons operating in Russia – Article 2(1)(g) of Directive 2014/145 – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment)cjeu_case · 15 октября 2025 г.
3827Case T-109/25: Judgment of the General Court of 15 October 2025 – Bulkhead v EUIPO – Ubisoft Entertainment (WARDOGS) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark WARDOGS – Earlier EU word mark WATCH DOGS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 15 октября 2025 г.
3828Case C-670/25, Berakov: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 15 October 2025 – Eurobank Bulgaria ADcjeu_case · 15 октября 2025 г.
3829Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 October 2025.#Frutaria Innovation SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Frutaria – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) and Article 51(2) of Regulation No 40/94.#Case T-381/24.cjeu_case · 15 октября 2025 г.
3830Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 October 2025.#Frutaria Innovation SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Frutaria – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) and Article 51(2) of Regulation No 40/94.#Case T-381/24.cjeu_case · 15 октября 2025 г.
3831Case T-381/24: Judgment of the General Court of 15 October 2025 – Frutaria Innovation v EUIPO – Schneider (Frutaria) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Frutaria – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) and Article 51(2) of Regulation No 40/94)cjeu_case · 15 октября 2025 г.
3832Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 October 2025.#Red Bull GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Abuse of dominant position – Energy drinks sector – Administrative procedure – Decision ordering an inspection – Article 20(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Obligation to state reasons – Sufficiently serious indicia – Suspicion of an infringement – Proportionality.#Case T-306/23.cjeu_case · 15 октября 2025 г.
3833Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 October 2025.#Red Bull GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Abuse of dominant position – Energy drinks sector – Administrative procedure – Decision ordering an inspection – Article 20(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Obligation to state reasons – Sufficiently serious indicia – Suspicion of an infringement – Proportionality.#Case T-306/23.cjeu_case · 15 октября 2025 г.
3834Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 October 2025 (Extracts).#WU v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Administrative inquiry – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Psychological harassment – Request for assistance – Refusal of the request – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Duty to exercise due care – Liability.#Cases T-295/23 and T-1176/23.cjeu_case · 15 октября 2025 г.
3835Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 October 2025 (Extracts).#WU v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Administrative inquiry – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Psychological harassment – Request for assistance – Refusal of the request – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Duty to exercise due care – Liability.#Cases T-295/23 and T-1176/23.cjeu_case · 15 октября 2025 г.
3836Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 October 2025 (Extracts).#WU v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Administrative inquiry – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Psychological harassment – Request for assistance – Refusal of the request – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Duty to exercise due care – Liability.#Cases T-295/23 and T-1176/23.cjeu_case · 15 октября 2025 г.
3837Arrêt du Tribunal (septième chambre) du 15 octobre 2025.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG contre Conseil de résolution unique.#Accès aux documents – Règlement (CE) no 1049/2001 – Documents concernant l’adoption par le CRU d’un dispositif de résolution à l’égard de Sberbank banka d.d. – Décisions du comité d’appel du CRU relatives à des décisions confirmatives du CRU de refus d’accès – Refus partiel d’accès – Exception relative à la protection de la politique financière, monétaire ou économique de l’Union ou d’un État membre – Article 4, paragraphe 1, sous a), quatrième tiret, du règlement no 1049/2001 – Exception relative à la protection des intérêts commerciaux d’un tiers – Article 4, paragraphe 2, premier tiret, du règlement no 1049/2001 – Exception relative à la protection de la vie privée et de l’intégrité de l’individu – Article 4, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement no 1049/2001.#Affaire T-291/23.cjeu_case · 15 октября 2025 г.
3838Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 October 2025.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG v Single Resolution Board.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents concerning the adoption by the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of a resolution scheme for Sberbank banka d.d. – Decisions of the SRB Appeal Panel concerning confirmatory decisions of the SRB refusing access – Partial refusal of access – Exception relating to the protection of the financial, monetary or economic policy of the European Union or of a Member State – Fourth indent of Article 4(1)(a) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party – First indent of Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual – Article 4(1)(b) of Regulation No 1049/2001.#Case T-291/23.cjeu_case · 15 октября 2025 г.
3839Arrêt du Tribunal (septième chambre) du 15 octobre 2025.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG contre Conseil de résolution unique.#Accès aux documents – Règlement (CE) no 1049/2001 – Documents concernant l’adoption par le CRU d’un dispositif de résolution à l’égard de Sberbank d.d. – Décisions du comité d’appel du CRU relatives à des décisions confirmatives du CRU de refus d’accès – Refus partiel d’accès – Exception relative à la protection de la politique financière, monétaire ou économique de l’Union ou d’un État membre – Article 4, paragraphe 1, sous a), quatrième tiret, du règlement no 1049/2001 – Exception relative à la protection des intérêts commerciaux d’un tiers – Article 4, paragraphe 2, premier tiret, du règlement no 1049/2001 – Exception relative à la protection des objectifs des activités d’inspection, d’enquête et d’audit – Article 4, paragraphe 2, troisième tiret, du règlement no 1049/2001.#Affaire T-290/23.cjeu_case · 15 октября 2025 г.
3840Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 October 2025.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG v Single Resolution Board.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents concerning the adoption by the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of a resolution scheme for Sberbank d.d. – Decisions of the SRB Appeal Panel concerning confirmatory decisions of the SRB refusing access – Partial refusal of access – Exception relating to the protection of the financial, monetary or economic policy of the European Union or of a Member State – Fourth indent of Article 4(1)(a) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party – First indent of Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – Third indent of Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001.#Case T-290/23.cjeu_case · 15 октября 2025 г.