Документы: Европейский Союз

59041

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#Antonio Romano and Lidia Romano v DSL Bank – a branch of DB Privat- und Firmenkundenbank AG, formerly DSL Bank – ein Geschäftsbereich der Deutsche Postbank AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2002/65/EC – Distance consumer loan agreement – Right of withdrawal – Exercising the right of withdrawal after the contract has been performed in full at the consumer’s express request – Communication to the consumer of information regarding the right of withdrawal.#Case C-143/18.

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59042

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#Antonio Romano and Lidia Romano v DSL Bank – a branch of DB Privat- und Firmenkundenbank AG, formerly DSL Bank – ein Geschäftsbereich der Deutsche Postbank AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Bonn.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2002/65/EC – Distance consumer loan agreement – Right of withdrawal – Exercising the right of withdrawal after the contract has been performed in full at the consumer’s express request – Communication to the consumer of information regarding the right of withdrawal.#Case C-143/18.

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59043

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 11 septembre 2019.#Caseificio Sociale San Rocco Soc. coop. arl e.a. contre Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA) et Regione Veneto.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Secteur du lait et des produits laitiers – Quotas – Prélèvement supplémentaire – Règlement (CEE) no 3950/92 – Article 2 – Perception du prélèvement par l’acheteur – Livraisons excédant la quantité de référence disponible du producteur – Montant du prix du lait – Application obligatoire d’une retenue – Remboursement du montant de prélèvement trop-perçu – Règlement (CE) no 1392/2001 – Article 9 – Acheteur – Non-respect de l’obligation d’effectuer le prélèvement supplémentaire – Producteurs – Non-respect de l’obligation de versement mensuel – Protection de la confiance légitime.#Affaire C-46/18.

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59044

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#Caseificio Sociale San Rocco Soc. coop. arl and Others v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA) and Regione Veneto.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Milk and milk products sector — Quotas — Additional levy — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Article 2 — Collection of the levy by the purchaser — Deliveries exceeding the available reference quantity of the producer — Amount of the price of milk — Mandatory application of a deduction — Reimbursement of the amount of overpaid levy — Regulation (EC) No 1392/2001 — Article 9 — Purchaser — Non‑compliance with obligation to implement the additional levy — Producers — Non-compliance with obligation to make monthly payments — Protection of legitimate expectations.#Case C-46/18.

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59045

Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 11 September 2019.#MSD Animal Health Innovation GmbH and Intervet International BV v European Medicines Agency.#Appeal — Access to documents of EU institutions, bodies, offices or agencies — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — First indent of Article 4(2) — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests — Article 4(3) — Protection of the decision-making process — Documents submitted to the European Medicines Agency in the context of a marketing authorisation application for a veterinary medicinal product — Decision to grant a third party access to the documents — General presumption of confidentiality — No obligation for an EU institution, body, office or agency to apply a general presumption of confidentiality.#Case C-178/18 P.

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59046

Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 11 September 2019.#PTC Therapeutics International Ltd v European Medicines Agency.#Appeal — Access to documents of EU institutions, bodies, offices or agencies — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — First indent of Article 4(2) — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests — Article 4(3) — Protection of the decision-making process — Documents submitted to the European Medicines Agency in the context of a marketing authorisation application for a medicinal product for human use — Decision to grant a third party access to the documents — General presumption of confidentiality — No obligation for an EU institution, body, office or agency to apply a general presumption of confidentiality.#Case C-175/18 P.

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59047

Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 11 September 2019.#Sole-Mizo Zrt. and Dalmandi Mezőgazdasági Zrt. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Szegedi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság and Szekszárdi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Right to deduct input tax – Refunding of excess VAT – Late repayment – Calculation of interest – Procedure for awarding interest due because of the unavailability of excess deductible VAT retained in breach of EU law and interest due as a result of delay by the tax authority in paying an amount due – Principles of effectiveness and equivalence.#Joined Cases C-13/18 and C-126/18.

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59048

Case C-540/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 September 2019 — HX v Council of the European Union (Appeal – Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic – Measures directed against influential businessmen and women engaged in activities in Syria – Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded)

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59049

Case C-397/18: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social No 3 de Barcelona — Spain) — DW v Nobel Plastiques Ibérica SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Article 2(2)(b)(ii) and Article 5 – Prohibition of any discrimination based on a disability – Worker particularly susceptible to occupational risks within the meaning of national law – Existence of a ‘disability’ – Dismissal for objective reasons based on criteria of productivity, multi-skilling in the undertaking’s posts and absenteeism – Particular disadvantage for disabled persons – Indirect discrimination – Reasonable accommodation – Individual who is not competent, capable and available to perform the essential functions of the post concerned)

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59050

Case C-383/18: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy Lublin-Wschód w Lublinie z siedzibą w Świdniku — Poland) — Lexitor sp. z o.o. v Spółdzielcza Kasa Oszczędnościowo — Kredytowa im. Franciszka Stefczyka, Santander Consumer Bank S.A. and mBank S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Credit agreements for consumers – Directive 2008/48/EC – Article 16(1) – Early repayment – Right of the consumer to a reduction in the total cost of the credit, consisting of the interest and the costs for the remaining duration of the contract)

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59051

Case C-143/18: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Bonn — Germany) — Antonio Romano, Lidia Romano v DSL Bank — eine Niederlassung der DB Privat- und Firmenkundenbank AG, formerly DSL Bank — a business division of Deutsche Postbank AG (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2002/65/EC – Distance consumer loan contract – Right of withdrawal – Exercising the right of withdrawal after the contract has been performed in full at the consumer’s express request – Communication to the consumer of information regarding the right of withdrawal)

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59052

Case C-46/18: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Caseificio Sociale San Rocco Soc. coop. arl and Others v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA), Regione Veneto (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Milk and milk products sector – Quotas – Additional levy – Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 – Article 2 – Collection of the levy by the purchaser – Deliveries exceeding the reference quantity available to producers – Amount from the price of the milk – Compulsory application of a deduction – Reimbursement of the amount of excess levy – Regulation (EC) No 1392/2001 – Article 9 – Buyer – Failure to comply with obligation to collect additional levy – Producers – Failure to comply with the monthly payment obligation – Protection of legitimate expectations)

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59053

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#Sergey Topor-Gilka and OOO WO Technopromexport v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment.#Joined Cases T-721/17 and T-722/17.

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59054

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#Sergey Topor-Gilka and OOO WO Technopromexport v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment.#Joined Cases T-721/17 and T-722/17.

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59055

Joined Cases T-721/17 and T-722/17: Judgment of the General Court of 11 September 2019 — Topor-Gilka and WO Technopromexport v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment)

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59056

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 11 septembre 2019.#Oana Mădălina Călin contre Direcţia Regională a Finanţelor Publice Ploieşti – Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Dâmboviţa e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Principes du droit de l’Union – Autonomie procédurale – Principes d’équivalence et d’effectivité – Principe de sécurité juridique – Autorité de la chose jugée – Restitution des taxes perçues par un État membre en violation du droit de l’Union – Décision juridictionnelle définitive imposant le paiement d’une taxe incompatible avec le droit de l’Union – Demande en révision d’une telle décision juridictionnelle – Délai pour l’introduction de cette demande.#Affaire C-676/17.

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59057

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#Oana Mădălina Călin v Direcţia Regională a Finanţelor Publice Ploieşti – Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Dâmboviţa and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Ploieşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Principles of EU law — Procedural autonomy — Principles of equivalence and effectiveness — Principle of legal certainty — Res judicata — Recovery of taxes levied by a Member State in breach of EU law — Final decision of a court or tribunal imposing payment of a tax which is incompatible with EU law — Request for revision of such a decision — Time limit for submitting that request.#Case C-676/17.

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59058

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 11 septembre 2019.#Federazione Italiana Golf (FIG) contre Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (ISTAT) et Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze et Federazione Italiana Sport Equestri (FISE) contre Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (ISTAT).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Règlement (UE) no 549/2013 – Système européen des comptes nationaux et régionaux dans l’Union européenne – Annexe A, point 20.15 – Contrôle exercé par un Comité national olympique sur des fédérations sportives nationales constituées sous la forme d’institutions sans but lucratif (ISBL) – Annexe A, point 20.15, deuxième phrase – Notion d’“intervention publique sous forme de réglementation générale s’appliquant à toutes les unités dans un même domaine d’activité” – Portée – Annexe A, point 20.15, première phrase – Notion de “pouvoir de déterminer [la] politique générale ou [le] programme” d’une ISBL – Portée – Annexe A, point 2.39, sous d), point 20.15, sous d), et point 20.309, sous i), dernière phrase – Prise en compte des cotisations versées par les adhérents à l’ISBL.#Affaires jointes C-612/17 et C-613/17.

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59059

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#Federazione Italiana Golf (FIG) v Istituto Nazionale di Statistica - ISTAT and Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze and Federazione Italiana Sport Equestri (FISE) v Istituto Nazionale di Statistica - ISTAT and.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Corte dei Conti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 549/2013 – European system of national and regional accounts in the European Union – Paragraph 20.15 of Annex A – Control by a National Olympic Committee of national sports federations in the form of non-profit institutions (NPIs) – Second sentence of paragraph 20.15 of Annex A – Definition of ‘public intervention in the form of general regulations applicable to all units working in the same activity’ – Scope – First sentence of paragraph 20.15 of Annex A – Definition of ‘ability to determine the general policy or programme’ of an NPI – Scope – Paragraph 2.39(d), paragraph 20.15(d) and the last sentence of paragraph 20.309(i) of Annex A – Account taken of membership fees paid to the NPI.#Joined Cases C-612/17 and C-613/17.

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59060

Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 11 September 2019.#Royalty Pharma Collection Trust v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundespatentgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual and industrial property — Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 — Supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products — Conditions for obtaining such a certificate — Article 3(a) — Concept of a ‘product protected by a basic patent in force’ — Assessment criteria.#Case C-650/17.

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.