7321Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#Governo Italiano v UX.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to present the reasons justifying the need for an interpretation of certain provisions of European Union law by the Court of Justice – Lack of sufficient details – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-163/23.cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7322Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#Governo della Repubblica italiana v UX.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Bologna.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to present the reasons justifying the need for an interpretation of certain provisions of European Union law by the Court of Justice – Lack of sufficient details – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-163/23.cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7323Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#„NOV ZHIVOT 1919“ NCh v Rakovoditel na Upravlyavashtia organ na programata za transgranichno satrudnichestvo INTERREG-IPP.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Own resources of the European Union – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Regulation (EU) No 1299/2013 – Specific provisions for the support from the European Regional Development Fund to the European territorial cooperation goal – Article 27 – Recovery from the lead beneficiary of amounts paid as a result of an irregularity – Implementing regulation (EU) No 447/2014 – Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA II) – Specific implementing rules – Articles 40 and 46 – Financial correction in the event of irregularity – Financial correction decision addressed to a beneficiary other than the lead beneficiary – Right of the lead beneficiary to participate in administrative and judicial proceedings relating to that decision – Articles 41 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-620/23.cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7324Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#‘NOV ZHIVOT 1919’ NCh v Rakovoditel na Upravlyavashtia organ na programata za transgranichno satrudnichestvo INTERREG-IPP.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-oblast.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Own resources of the European Union – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Regulation (EU) No 1299/2013 – Specific provisions for the support from the European Regional Development Fund to the European territorial cooperation goal – Article 27 – Recovery from the lead beneficiary of amounts paid as a result of an irregularity – Implementing regulation (EU) No 447/2014 – Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA II) – Specific implementing rules – Articles 40 and 46 – Financial correction in the event of irregularity – Financial correction decision addressed to a beneficiary other than the lead beneficiary – Right of the lead beneficiary to participate in administrative and judicial proceedings relating to that decision – Articles 41 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-620/23.cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7325Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#FT and Others v État belge.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Intellectual property – Copyright and related rights – Performers engaged under an administrative law statute – Assignment of related rights by means of a regulatory act – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 2(b) and Article 3(2) – Rights of reproduction and of making available to the public – Directive 2006/115/EC – Articles 7 to 9 – Rights of fixation, broadcasting, communication to the public and distribution – Directive (EU) 2019/790 – Articles 18 to 23 – Fair remuneration in exploitation contracts – Article 26 – Application in time – Concepts of ‘acts concluded’ and ‘rights acquired’.#Case C-575/23.cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7326Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#FT and Others v Belgian State.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (Belgium).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Intellectual property – Copyright and related rights – Performers engaged under an administrative law statute – Assignment of related rights by means of a regulatory act – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 2(b) and Article 3(2) – Rights of reproduction and of making available to the public – Directive 2006/115/EC – Articles 7 to 9 – Rights of fixation, broadcasting, communication to the public and distribution – Directive (EU) 2019/790 – Articles 18 to 23 – Fair remuneration in exploitation contracts – Article 26 – Application in time – Concepts of ‘acts concluded’ and ‘rights acquired’.#Case C-575/23.cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7327Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#Obshtina Veliko Tarnovo and Obshtina Belovo v Rakovoditel na Upravlyavashtia organ na Operativna programa ‘Regioni v rastezh’ 2014-2020 and Rakovoditel na Upravlyavashtia organ na Operativna programa ‘Okolna sreda’ 2014-2020.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Economic, social and territorial cohesion – Own resources of the European Union – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 – Article 2(10) – Concept of ‘beneficiary’ – Financial correction for breach of national public procurement legislation – Addressee of a financial correction decision – Determination of liability for that correction and contractual apportionment of that liability between the recipient of State aid and the manager of that aid – Participation in administrative and judicial proceedings relating to that decision – Articles 41 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Joined Cases C-471/23 and C-477/23.cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7328Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#Obshtina Veliko Tarnovo and Obshtina Belovo v Rakovoditel na Upravlyavashtia organ na Operativna programa ‘Regioni v rastezh’ 2014-2020 and Rakovoditel na Upravlyavashtia organ na Operativna programa ‘Okolna sreda’ 2014-2020.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Economic, social and territorial cohesion – Own resources of the European Union – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 – Article 2(10) – Concept of ‘beneficiary’ – Financial correction for breach of national public procurement legislation – Addressee of a financial correction decision – Determination of liability for that correction and contractual apportionment of that liability between the recipient of State aid and the manager of that aid – Participation in administrative and judicial proceedings relating to that decision – Articles 41 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Joined Cases C-471/23 and C-477/23.cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7329Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 March 2025.##Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) 2019/1111 – Scope – Article 1(1)(b) and (2)(e) – Measure relating to the disposal of the property of a child – Article 7 – Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility – Article 10 – Choice of court – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Scope – Article 1(2)(a) – Exclusion concerning the status or legal capacity of natural persons – Rules on jurisdiction laid down in a bilateral agreement between the Republic of Bulgaria and the Russian Federation concluded before the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria to the European Union – Difference between those rules and the rules laid down in Regulation 2019/1111 – Article 351 TFEU – Concept of ‘incompatibility’.#Case C-395/23.cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7330Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#E.M.A. and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) 2019/1111 – Scope – Article 1(1)(b) and (2)(e) – Measure relating to the disposal of the property of a child – Article 7 – Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility – Article 10 – Choice of court – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Scope – Article 1(2)(a) – Exclusion concerning the status or legal capacity of natural persons – Rules on jurisdiction laid down in a bilateral agreement between the Republic of Bulgaria and the Russian Federation concluded before the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria to the European Union – Difference between those rules and the rules laid down in Regulation 2019/1111 – Article 351 TFEU – Concept of ‘incompatibility’.#Case C-395/23.cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7331Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#European Commission v Republic of Croatia.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 260(2) TFEU – Waste treatment – Directive 2008/98/EC – Stone aggregate deposited in the Biljane Donje (Croatia) landfill site – Article 5(1) – Concept of ‘by-product’ – Article 13 – Obligation of Member States to ensure the protection of human health and of the environment – Article 15(1) – Obligation to have waste treated by the holder or by other designated persons – Judgment of the Court establishing a failure to fulfil obligations – Failure to comply – Financial penalties – Lump sum payment – Penalty payment.#Case C-315/23.cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7332Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#European Commission v Republic of Croatia.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 260(2) TFEU – Waste treatment – Directive 2008/98/EC – Stone aggregate deposited in the Biljane Donje (Croatia) landfill site – Article 5(1) – Concept of ‘by-product’ – Article 13 – Obligation of Member States to ensure the protection of human health and of the environment – Article 15(1) – Obligation to have waste treated by the holder or by other designated persons – Judgment of the Court establishing a failure to fulfil obligations – Failure to comply – Financial penalties – Lump sum payment – Penalty payment.#Case C-315/23.cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7333Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#European Commission v Hungary.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Protection of persons who report breaches of Union law – Directive (EU) 2019/1937 – Article 26(1) and (3) – Failure to transpose and communicate transposition measures – Article 260(3) TFEU – Application for the imposition of a lump sum – Criteria for establishing the amount of the penalty – Automatic application of a coefficient for seriousness.#Case C-155/23.cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7334Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#European Commission v Hungary.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Protection of persons who report breaches of Union law – Directive (EU) 2019/1937 – Article 26(1) and (3) – Failure to transpose and communicate transposition measures – Article 260(3) TFEU – Application for the imposition of a lump sum – Criteria for establishing the amount of the penalty – Automatic application of a coefficient for seriousness.#Case C-155/23.cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7335Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#European Commission v Republic of Estonia.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Protection of persons who report breaches of Union law – Directive (EU) 2019/1937 – Article 26(1) and (3) – Failure to transpose and communicate transposition measures – Article 260(3) TFEU – Application for the imposition of a lump sum and a daily penalty payment – Criteria for establishing the amount of the penalties – Automatic application of a coefficient for seriousness.#Case C-154/23.cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7336Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#European Commission v Republic of Estonia.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Protection of persons who report breaches of Union law – Directive (EU) 2019/1937 – Article 26(1) and (3) – Failure to transpose and communicate transposition measures – Article 260(3) TFEU – Application for the imposition of a lump sum and a daily penalty payment – Criteria for establishing the amount of the penalties – Automatic application of a coefficient for seriousness.#Case C-154/23.cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7337Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#European Commission v Czech Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Protecting people who report breaches of EU law – Directive (EU) 2019/1937 – Article 26(1) and (3) – Failure to transpose and communicate transposition measures – Article 260(3) TFEU – Application for the imposition of a lump sum – Criteria for establishing the amount of the penalty – Automatic application of a coefficient for seriousness.#Case C-152/23.cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7338Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#European Commission v Czech Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Protecting people who report breaches of EU law – Directive (EU) 2019/1937 – Article 26(1) and (3) – Failure to transpose and communicate transposition measures – Article 260(3) TFEU – Application for the imposition of a lump sum – Criteria for establishing the amount of the penalty – Automatic application of a coefficient for seriousness.#Case C-152/23.cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7339Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Protection of persons who report breaches of Union law – Directive (EU) 2019/1937 – Article 26(1) and (3) – Failure to transpose and communicate transposition measures – Article 260(3) TFEU – Application for the imposition of a lump sum – Criteria for establishing the amount of the penalty – Automatic application of a coefficient for seriousness.#Case C-150/23.cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7340Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Protection of persons who report breaches of Union law – Directive (EU) 2019/1937 – Article 26(1) and (3) – Failure to transpose and communicate transposition measures – Article 260(3) TFEU – Application for the imposition of a lump sum – Criteria for establishing the amount of the penalty – Automatic application of a coefficient for seriousness.#Case C-150/23.cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025