Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
40882

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 March 2019.#Ilona Biernacka-Hoba v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark Formata — Earlier international figurative mark Formata — Relative ground for invalidity — Article 60(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Rule 37 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 12 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Conditions governing the representation of the earlier mark — Rule 19 of Regulation No 2868/95 (now Article 7 of Delegated Regulation 2018/625) — Legitimate expectations — Reimbursement of the costs of representation — Article 109 of Regulation 2017/1001 and Rule 94 of Regulation No 2868/95 (now Article 109 of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-265/18.

cjeu_case ·
40883

Case T-265/18: Judgment of the General Court of 27 March 2019 — Biernacka-Hoba v EUIPO — Formata Bogusław Hoba (Formata) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark Formata — Earlier international figurative mark Formata — Relative ground for invalidity — Article 60(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Rule 37 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 12 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Conditions governing the representation of the earlier mark — Rule 19 of Regulation No 2868/95 (now Article 7 of Delegated Regulation 2018/625) — Legitimate expectations — Reimbursement of the costs of representation — Article 109 of Regulation 2017/1001 and Rule 94 of Regulation No 2868/95 (now Article 109 of Regulation 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
40884

Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 27 mars 2019.#Mydibel SA contre État belge.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Harmonisation des législations fiscales – Déduction de la taxe payée en amont – Bien d’investissement immobilier – Cession-bail (sale and lease back) – Régularisation des déductions de la TVA – Principe de neutralité de la TVA – Principe de l’égalité de traitement.#Affaire C-201/18.

cjeu_case ·
40885

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 March 2019.#Mydibel SA v État belge.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Mons.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Harmonisation of fiscal legislation — Deduction of input tax — Immovable property acquired as capital goods — Sale and lease back — Adjustment of deductions of VAT — Principle of VAT neutrality — Principle of equal treatment.#Case C-201/18.

cjeu_case ·
40886

Case C-201/18: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the cour d’appel de Mons — Belgium) — Mydibel SA v État belge (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Harmonisation of fiscal legislation — Deduction of input tax — Immovable property acquired as capital goods — Sale and lease back — Adjustment of deductions of VAT — Principle of VAT neutrality — Principle of equal treatment)

cjeu_case ·
40887

Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 27 mars 2019.#slewo – schlafen leben wohnen GmbH contre Sascha Ledowski.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Directive 2011/83/UE – Article 6, paragraphe 1, sous k), et article 16, sous e) – Contrat conclu à distance – Droit de rétractation – Exceptions – Notion de “biens scellés ne pouvant être renvoyés pour des raisons de protection de la santé ou d’hygiène et qui ont été descellés par le consommateur après la livraison” – Matelas dont la protection a été retirée par le consommateur après la livraison.#Affaire C-681/17.

cjeu_case ·
40888

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 March 2019.#slewo - schlafen leben wohnen GmbH v Sascha Ledowski.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2011/83/EU — Article 6(1)(k) and Article 16(e) — Distance contract — Right of withdrawal — Exceptions — Concept of ‘sealed goods which are not suitable for return due to health protection or hygiene reasons and which have been unsealed by the consumer after delivery’ — Mattress whose protective seal has been removed by the consumer after delivery.#Case C-681/17.

cjeu_case ·
40889

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 27 mars 2019.#Procédure engagée par Oy Hartwall Ab.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Rapprochement des législations – Marques – Directive 2008/95/CE – Article 2 et article 3, paragraphe 1, sous b) – Refus d’enregistrement ou nullité – Appréciation in concreto du caractère distinctif – Qualification d’une marque – Incidence – Marque de couleur ou marque figurative – Représentation graphique d’une marque présentée sous forme figurative – Conditions pour l’enregistrement – Représentation graphique insuffisamment claire et précise.#Affaire C-578/17.

cjeu_case ·
40890

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 March 2019.#Proceedings brought by Oy Hartwall Ab.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Trade marks — Directive 2008/95/EC — Articles 2 and 3(1)(b) — Refusal to register or invalidity — Assessment of distinctive character by reference to the actual situation — Classification of a trade mark — Effect — Colour mark or figurative mark — Graphic representation of a mark submitted as a figurative mark — Conditions for registration — Insufficiently clear and precise graphic representation.#Case C-578/17.

cjeu_case ·
40891

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 27 mars 2019.#Mariusz Pawlak contre Prezes Kasy Rolniczego Ubezpieczenia Społecznego.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Marché intérieur des services postaux – Directives 97/67/CE et 2008/6/CE – Article 7, paragraphe 1 – Notion de “droits exclusifs ou spéciaux pour la mise en place et la prestation de services postaux” – Article 8 – Droit des États membres d’organiser le service d’envois recommandés utilisé dans le cadre de procédures judiciaires – Délai de dépôt d’un acte de procédure devant une juridiction – Interprétation conforme du droit national avec le droit de l’Union – Limites – Effet direct invoqué par une émanation d’un État membre dans le cadre d’un litige l’opposant à un particulier.#Affaire C-545/17.

cjeu_case ·
40892

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 March 2019.#Mariusz Pawlak v Prezes Kasy Rolniczego Ubezpieczenia Społecznego.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market for postal services – Directives 97/67/EC and 2008/6/EC – Article 7(1) – Definition of ‘exclusive or special rights for the establishment and provision of postal services’ – Article 8 – Right of the Member States to organise the registered mail service used in the course of judicial procedures – Time limit for lodging a procedural document before a court – Interpretation of national law in conformity with EU law – Limits – Direct effect relied on by an emanation of a Member State in proceedings between that emanation and an individual.#Case C-545/17.

cjeu_case ·
40895

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 27 mars 2019.#Canadian Solar Emea GmbH e.a. contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Dumping – Importations de modules photovoltaïques en silicium cristallin et de leurs composants essentiels (cellules) originaires ou en provenance de Chine – Droit antidumping définitif – Règlement (CE) no 1225/2009 – Article 3, paragraphe 7 – Article 9, paragraphe 4 – Champ d’application temporel du règlement (UE) no 1168/2012.#Affaire C-236/17 P.

cjeu_case ·
40898

Case C-681/17: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — slewo — schlafen leben wohnen GmbH v Sascha Ledowski (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2011/83/EU — Article 6(1)(k) and Article 16(e) — Distance contract — Right of withdrawal — Exceptions — Concept of ‘sealed goods which are not suitable for return due to health protection or hygiene reasons and which have been unsealed by the consumer after delivery’ — Mattress whose protective seal has been removed by the consumer after delivery)

cjeu_case ·
40899

Case C-578/17: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — proceedings brought by Oy Hartwall Ab (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Trade marks — Directive 2008/95/EC — Articles 2 and 3(1)(b) — Refusal to register or invalidity — Assessment of distinctive character by reference to the actual situation — Classification of a trade mark — Effect — Colour mark or figurative mark — Graphic representation of a mark submitted as a figurative mark — Conditions for registration — Insufficiently clear and precise graphic representation)

cjeu_case ·
40900

Case C-545/17: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy — Poland) — Mariusz Pawlak v Prezes Kasy Rolniczego Ubezpieczenia Społecznego (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Internal market of postal services — Directives 97/67/EC and 2008/6/EC — Article 7(1) — Definition of ‘exclusive or special rights for the establishment and provision of postal services’ — Article 8 — Right of the Member States to organise the registered mail service used in the course of judicial proceedings — Time-limit for lodging a procedural document before a court — Interpretation of national law in conformity with EU law — Limits — Direct effect relied on by an emanation of a Member State in proceedings between it and an individual)

cjeu_case ·