Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
38032

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 26 septembre 2019.#UTEP 2006. SRL contre Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal Hatósági Főosztály, Hatósági, Építésügyi és Oktatási Osztály.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Transport routier – Articles 91 et 92 TFUE – Règlement (UE) no 165/2014 – Article 32, paragraphe 3, article 33, paragraphe 1, et article 41, paragraphe 1 – Infraction aux règles relatives à l’utilisation des tachygraphes – Obligation pour les États membres de prévoir des sanctions effectives, dissuasives et non discriminatoires – Petites et moyennes entreprises résidentes et non résidentes – Traitement différencié.#Affaire C-600/18.

cjeu_case ·
38033

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 September 2019.#UTEP 2006. SRL v Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal Hatósági Főosztály, Hatósági, Építésügyi és Oktatási Osztály.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Szombathelyi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Road transport — Articles 91 and 92 TFEU — Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 — Article 32(3), Article 33(1) and Article 41(1) — Infringement of the rules on the use of tachographs — Duty of Member States to make provision for effective, dissuasive and non-discriminatory penalties — Resident and non-resident small and medium-sized enterprises — Differential treatment.#Case C-600/18.

cjeu_case ·
38034

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 September 2019.#European Commission v Kingdom of Spain.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — European Union water policy — Directive 2000/60/EC — Article 13(1) and (7) and Article 15(1) — Failure to adopt, publish and communicate to the European Commission revised and updated river basin management plans for Lanzarote, Fuerteventura, Gran Canaria, Tenerife, La Gomera, La Palma and El Hierro (Spain) — Article 14 — Failure to inform and consult the public relating to the revision and the updating.#Case C-556/18.

cjeu_case ·
38036

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 September 2019.#Vitali SpA v Autostrade per l'Italia SpA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 49 and 56 TFEU — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 71 — Subcontracting — National legislation limiting the possibility of subcontracting to 30% of the total amount of the contract.#Case C-63/18.

cjeu_case ·
38037

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 September 2019.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Klymenko v Council of the European Union.#Appeal — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds and economic resources — List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the appellant’s name — Decision by an authority of a third State — Council’s obligation to verify that that decision was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection — Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-11/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
38038

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 26 September 2019.#GAEC Jeanningros v Institut national de l’origine et de la qualité (INAO) and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Agriculture — Protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs — Protected designation of origin ‘Comté’ — Minor amendment to a product specification — Action before national courts contesting an application for an amendment — Case-law of the national courts according to which the action becomes devoid of purpose when the European Commission has approved the amendment — Effective judicial protection — Obligation to rule on the action.#Case C-785/18.

cjeu_case ·
38039

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 26 September 2019.#GN v ZU.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Montreal Convention — Article 17(1) — Air carrier liability in the event of accidents — Concept of ‘accident’ — Aircraft in flight — Spillage of a cup of coffee placed on the tray table of a seat — Bodily injuries caused to the passenger.#Case C-532/18.

cjeu_case ·