Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
33387

Order of the Vice-President of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 3 September 2020.#Gamma-A SIA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-200/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
33388

Order of the Vice-President of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 3 September 2020.#Gamma-A SIA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-200/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
33389

Order of the Vice-President of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 3 September 2020.#Gamma-A SIA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-199/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
33390

Order of the Vice-President of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 3 September 2020.#Gamma-A SIA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-199/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
33393

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 September 2020.#MV v SATA International - Serviços e Transportes Aéreos SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(3) – Compensation to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights – Scope – Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation – Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ – Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory famework of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-137/20.

cjeu_case ·
33394

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 September 2020.#MV v SATA International - Serviços e Transportes Aéreos SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(3) – Compensation to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights – Scope – Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation – Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ – Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory famework of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-137/20.

cjeu_case ·
33395

Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 3 septembre 2020.#mBank S.A. contre PA.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Compétence judiciaire en matière civile – Règlement (UE) no 1215/2012 – Compétence des juridictions de l’État membre sur le territoire duquel est domicilié le consommateur – Article 18, paragraphe 2 – Action intentée contre le consommateur par le professionnel – Notion de “domicile du consommateur” – Moment pertinent pour déterminer le domicile du consommateur – Transfert du domicile du consommateur après la conclusion du contrat et avant l’introduction du recours.#Affaire C-98/20.

cjeu_case ·
33400

Case C-137/20: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores — Portugal) — MV v SATA International — Serviços e Transportes Aéreos SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 5(3) — Compensation to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights — Scope — Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation — Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ — Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory framework of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·