Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
33141

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2020.#WV v Landkreis Harburg.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction in matters relating to maintenance obligations – Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 – Article 3(b) – Court for the place where the maintenance creditor is habitually resident – Action for recovery brought by a public body subrogated to the claims of a maintenance creditor.#Case C-540/19.

cjeu_case ·
33142

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 17 septembre 2020.#Ministre de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation contre Compagnie des pêches de Saint-Malo.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Aides d’État – Notion – Naufrage du navire pétrolier Erika – Régime d’aides en faveur d’entreprises d’aquaculture et de pêche – Décision déclarant le régime d’aides en partie incompatible avec le marché commun et ordonnant la récupération des aides versées – Appréciation de validité Examen d’office Recevabilité Défaut d’introduction d’un recours en annulation par la défenderesse au principal Allègement de charges sociales – Cotisations salariales – Avantage – Détermination du débiteur de l’obligation de restitution.#Affaire C-212/19.

cjeu_case ·
33143

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 September 2020.#Ministre de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation v Compagnie des pêches de Saint-Malo.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Concept – Wreck of the oil tanker Erika – Aid scheme for aquaculture and fisheries undertakings – Decision declaring the aid scheme partly incompatible with the common market and ordering the recovery of the aid paid out – Assessment of validity – Examination of the Court’s own motion – Admissibility – Failure to bring an action for annulment by the defendant in the main proceedings – Reduction in social security contributions – Employees’ contributions – Advantage – Question of who is liable for repayment.#Case C-212/19.

cjeu_case ·
33146

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 17 septembre 2020.#Mylène Troszczynski contre Parlement européen.#Pourvoi – Droit institutionnel – Membre du Parlement européen – Protocole sur les privilèges et immunités de l’Union européenne – Article 8 – Immunité parlementaire – Activité sans lien avec les fonctions parlementaires – Publication sur le compte Twitter du député – Article 9 – Inviolabilité parlementaire – Portée – Décision de levée de l’immunité parlementaire.#Affaire C-12/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
33147

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 September 2020.#Mylène Troszczynski v European Parliament.#Appeal – Law governing the institutions – Member of the European Parliament – Protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Union – Article 8 – Parliamentary immunity – Activity not connected to parliamentary duties – Publication on the Member’s Twitter account – Article 9 – Parliamentary privilege – Scope – Decision to waive parliamentary immunity.#Case C-12/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
33148

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 17 September 2020.#G. M. A. v État belge.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of movement for persons – Article 45 TFEU – Citizenship of the Union – Directive 2004/38/EC – Right of residence for more than three months – Article 14(4)(b) – Jobseekers – Reasonable period of time to acquaint themselves with potentially suitable employment opportunities and take the necessary steps to obtain employment – Requirements imposed by the host Member State on the jobseeker during that period – Conditions governing the right of residence – Obligation to continue seeking employment and to have a genuine chance of being engaged.#Case C-710/19.

cjeu_case ·
33150

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 17 September 2020.#JR.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Irlande).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Scope – Article 8(1)(c) – Concept of ‘enforceable judgment’ – Offence giving rise to a conviction by a court of a third State – Kingdom of Norway – Judgment recognised and enforced by the issuing State by virtue of a bilateral agreement – Article 4(7)(b) – Grounds for optional non-execution of the European arrest warrant – Extra-territorial offence.#Case C-488/19.

cjeu_case ·
33151

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 17 September 2020.#Maksu- ja Tolliamet v Heavyinstall OÜ.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2010/24/EU – Article 16 – Recovery of claims relating to taxes, duties and other measures – Mutual assistance – Request for precautionary measures – Judicial decision of the applicant Member State for the purpose of implementing precautionary measures – Jurisdiction of the court of the requested Member State to assess and reassess the justification of those measures – Principles of mutual trust and of mutual recognition.#Case C-420/19.

cjeu_case ·
33152

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 17 September 2020.#RTS infra BVBA and Aannemingsbedrijf Norré-Behaegel v Vlaams Gewest.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement contracts – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 57(6) – Optional grounds for exclusion – Measures taken by the economic operator to demonstrate its reliability despite the existence of an optional ground for exclusion – Obligation of the economic operator to provide evidence of such measures on its own initiative – Direct effect.#Case C-387/19.

cjeu_case ·
33153

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 17 September 2020.#QM v Finanzamt Saarbrücken.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht des Saarlandes.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 2(1)(c) – Supplies of services for consideration – Article 26(1) – Transactions treated as supplies of services for consideration – Article 56(2) – Determination of the point of reference for tax purposes – Hiring of means of transport – Making cars available to employees.#Case C-288/19.

cjeu_case ·
33154

Case C-837/19: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — Super Bock Bebidas SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Deduction of input tax — Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC — Article 17(6) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 168 and 176 — Exclusion from the right to deduct — Purchase of accommodation, food, drink, vehicle leases, fuel and tolls services — Standstill clause — Accession to the European Union)

cjeu_case ·
33155

Case C-623/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 September 2020 — Alfamicro — Sistemas de computadores, Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda v European Commission (Appeal — Action for annulment — Decision to recover a debt — Enforcement order — Principle of res judicata — Adoption of a decision which is enforceable within the meaning of Article 299 TFEU for the recovery of grants awarded under a contract — Grant agreement concluded under the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) (2007-2013))

cjeu_case ·
33156

Case C-540/19: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — WV v Landkreis Harburg (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction in matters relating to maintenance obligations — Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 — Article 3(b) — Court for the place where the maintenance creditor is habitually resident — Action for recovery brought by a public body subrogated to the claims of a maintenance creditor)

cjeu_case ·
33157

Case C-212/19: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Ministre de l’Agriculture et de l’Alimentation v Compagnie des pêches de Saint-Malo (Reference for a preliminary ruling — State aid — Concept — Wreck of the oil tanker Erika — Aid scheme for aquaculture and fisheries undertakings — Decision declaring the aid scheme partly incompatible with the common market and ordering the recovery of the aid paid out — Assessment of validity — Examination of the Court’s own motion — Admissibility — Failure to bring an action for annulment by the defendant in the main proceedings — Reduction in social security contributions — Employees’ contributions — Advantage — Question of who is liable for repayment)

cjeu_case ·
33159

Case C-12/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 September 2020 — Mylène Troszczynski v European Parliament (Appeal — Law governing the institutions — Member of the European Parliament — Protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Union — Article 8 — Parliamentary immunity — Activity not connected to parliamentary duties — Publication on the Member’s Twitter account — Article 9 — Parliamentary privilege — Scope — Decision to waive parliamentary immunity)

cjeu_case ·
33160

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 17 septembre 2020.#Procédure pénale contre JZ.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Retour des ressortissants de pays tiers en séjour irrégulier – Directive 2008/115/CE – Article 11 – Interdiction d’entrée – Ressortissant d’un pays tiers à l’égard duquel une telle interdiction a été prononcée, mais qui n’a jamais quitté l’État membre concerné – Réglementation nationale prévoyant une peine d’emprisonnement pour le séjour de ce ressortissant dans cet État membre alors qu’il a connaissance de l’interdiction d’entrée émise à son égard.#Affaire C-806/18.

cjeu_case ·