23842Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2022.#José María Castillejo Oriol v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Refusal of the European Commission to bring infringement proceedings – Dismissal of the action as manifestly inadmissible – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-1/22 P.cjeu_case · 2 mai 2022
23843Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2022.#José María Castillejo Oriol v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Refusal of the European Commission to bring infringement proceedings – Dismissal of the action as manifestly inadmissible – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-1/22 P.cjeu_case · 2 mai 2022
23844Case C-291/22 P: Appeal brought on 2 May 2022 by Debregeas et associés Pharma (D & A Pharma) against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 2 March 2022 in Case T-556/20 D & A Pharma v Commission and EMAcjeu_case · 2 mai 2022
23845Case C-13/22: Order of the President of the Sixth Chamber of the Court of 2 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Piteşti — Romania) — EF, GH, IJ v KLcjeu_case · 2 mai 2022
23846Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 May 2022.#Airoldi Metalli SpA v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Dumping – Imports of aluminium extrusions originating in China – Act imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty – Importer – Regulatory act entailing implementing measures – Act not of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-328/21.cjeu_case · 2 mai 2022
23847Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 May 2022 (Extracts).#Airoldi Metalli SpA v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Dumping – Imports of aluminium extrusions originating in China – Act imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty – Importer – Regulatory act entailing implementing measures – Act not of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-328/21.cjeu_case · 2 mai 2022
23848Case T-328/21: Order of the General Court of 2 May 2022 — Airoldi Metalli v Commission (Action for annulment — Dumping — Imports of aluminium extrusions originating in China — Act imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty — Importer — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Act not of individual concern — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 2 mai 2022
23849Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 May 2022.#S.H. v Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Sibiu and Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Braşov.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Harmonisation of fiscal legislation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Deduction of input tax paid in relation to the purchase, building and alteration of immovable property – Ex officio revocation of a taxable person’s identification for VAT purposes – Adjustment of the initial deduction – Reply to the question referred for a preliminary ruling which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law.#Case C-627/21.cjeu_case · 2 mai 2022
23850Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 May 2022.#S.H. v Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Sibiu and Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Braşov.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Harmonisation of fiscal legislation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Deduction of input tax paid in relation to the purchase, building and alteration of immovable property – Ex officio revocation of a taxable person’s identification for VAT purposes – Adjustment of the initial deduction – Reply to the question referred for a preliminary ruling which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law.#Case C-627/21.cjeu_case · 2 mai 2022
23851Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2022.#Správa železnic, státní organizace v České dráhy a.s. v České dráhy a.s. and Others and České dráhy a.s.v Univerzita Pardubice and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Rail transport – Directive 2012/34/EU – Decisions of the regulatory body – Article 56(10) – Judicial review – National law providing for the jurisdiction of civil courts – Detailed procedural rules governing the appeal – Compatibility with Directive 2012/34 – Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Joined Cases C-221/21 and C-222/21.cjeu_case · 2 mai 2022
23852Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2022.#Správa železnic, státní organizace v České dráhy a.s. v České dráhy a.s. and Others and České dráhy a.s.v Univerzita Pardubice and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 1.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Rail transport – Directive 2012/34/EU – Decisions of the regulatory body – Article 56(10) – Judicial review – National law providing for the jurisdiction of civil courts – Detailed procedural rules governing the appeal – Compatibility with Directive 2012/34 – Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Joined Cases C-221/21 and C-222/21.cjeu_case · 2 mai 2022
23853Case C-627/21: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia — Romania) — SH v Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Sibiu, Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Braşov (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Harmonisation of fiscal legislation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Deduction of input tax paid in relation to the purchase, building and alteration of immovable property — Ex officio revocation of a taxable person’s identification for VAT purposes — Adjustment of the initial deduction — Reply to the question referred for a preliminary ruling which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law)cjeu_case · 2 mai 2022
23854Joined Cases C-221/21 and C-222/21: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2022 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 1 — Czech Republic) — Správa železnic, státní organizace v České dráhy a.s., PKP Cargo International a.s., PDV Railway a.s., KŽC Doprava, s.r.o. (C-221/21), and České dráhy a.s. v Univerzita Pardubice and Others (C-222/21) (References for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Rail transport — Directive 2012/34/EU — Decisions of the regulatory body — Article 56(10) — Judicial review — National law providing for the jurisdiction of the civil courts — Rules governing the action — Compatibility with Directive 2012/34 — Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)cjeu_case · 2 mai 2022
23855Case T-239/22: Action brought on 29 April 2022 — Cherusci v EUIPO — LexDellmeier (RIALTO)cjeu_case · 29 avril 2022
23858Case T-235/22: Action brought on 29 April 2022 — Russian Direct Investment Fund v Councilcjeu_case · 29 avril 2022
23860Case C-288/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d’arrondissement (Luxembourg) lodged on 29 April 2022 — TP v Administration de l’enregistrement, des domaines et de la TVAcjeu_case · 29 avril 2022