Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161354) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43245) directive (8067)
316 981 documents
51462

Order of the Vice-President of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 3 September 2020.#Gamma-A SIA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-200/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
51463

Order of the Vice-President of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 3 September 2020.#Gamma-A SIA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-200/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
51464

Order of the Vice-President of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 3 September 2020.#Gamma-A SIA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-199/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
51465

Order of the Vice-President of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 3 September 2020.#Gamma-A SIA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-199/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
51468

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 September 2020.#MV v SATA International - Serviços e Transportes Aéreos SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(3) – Compensation to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights – Scope – Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation – Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ – Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory famework of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-137/20.

cjeu_case ·
51469

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 September 2020.#MV v SATA International - Serviços e Transportes Aéreos SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(3) – Compensation to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights – Scope – Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation – Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ – Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory famework of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-137/20.

cjeu_case ·
51470

Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 3 septembre 2020.#mBank S.A. contre PA.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Compétence judiciaire en matière civile – Règlement (UE) no 1215/2012 – Compétence des juridictions de l’État membre sur le territoire duquel est domicilié le consommateur – Article 18, paragraphe 2 – Action intentée contre le consommateur par le professionnel – Notion de “domicile du consommateur” – Moment pertinent pour déterminer le domicile du consommateur – Transfert du domicile du consommateur après la conclusion du contrat et avant l’introduction du recours.#Affaire C-98/20.

cjeu_case ·
51475

Case C-137/20: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores — Portugal) — MV v SATA International — Serviços e Transportes Aéreos SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 5(3) — Compensation to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights — Scope — Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation — Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ — Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory framework of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
51476

Case C-98/20: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 8 — Czech Republic) — mBank S.A. v PA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Jurisdiction in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Jurisdiction of the courts of the Member State in which the consumer is domiciled — Article 18(2) — Proceedings brought against the consumer by the seller or supplier — Concept of ‘consumer’s domicile’ — Relevant time for determining the consumer’s domicile — Transfer of the consumer’s domicile after the conclusion of the contract and before the action is brought)

cjeu_case ·
51480

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 September 2020.#Crewprint Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Principles of fiscal neutrality, of effectiveness and of proportionality – Right to VAT deduction – Refusal – Fraud – Proof – Chain of subcontractors.#Case C-611/19.

cjeu_case ·