Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161354) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43245) directive (8067)
316 981 documents
50725

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#Jean Whitehead and David Evans v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union – UK citizens residing in another EU Member State – 2019 European elections – Request made to Council of the European Union to postpone the European elections – Actions for failure to act – No locus standi – Action dismissed by the General Court as inadmissible – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-158/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
50726

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#Jean Whitehead and David Evans v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union – UK citizens residing in another EU Member State – 2019 European elections – Request made to Council of the European Union to postpone the European elections – Actions for failure to act – No locus standi – Action dismissed by the General Court as inadmissible – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-158/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
50727

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#Slovenský plynárenský priemysel, a.s. v Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Directive 90/435/EEC – Common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States – Scope ratione temporis – Corporation tax relating to a period prior to the date of accession of a Member State to the European Union – Tax adjustment issued after the date of accession.#Case C-113/20.

cjeu_case ·
50728

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#Slovenský plynárenský priemysel, a.s. v Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Directive 90/435/EEC – Common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States – Scope ratione temporis – Corporation tax relating to a period prior to the date of accession of a Member State to the European Union – Tax adjustment issued after the date of accession.#Case C-113/20.

cjeu_case ·
50729

Ordonnance de la Cour (septième chambre) du 1er octobre 2020.#Procédure pénale contre GR e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Convention d’application de l’accord de Schengen – Article 54 – Principe ne bis in idem – Champ d’application – Identité des faits matériels – Absence de précisions suffisantes concernant le contexte factuel et les raisons justifiant la nécessité d’une réponse à la question préjudicielle – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-89/20.

cjeu_case ·
50730

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Županijski sud u Puli.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement – Article 54 – Ne bis in idem principle – Scope – Identity of the material facts – Absence of sufficient information concerning the factual background and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-89/20.

cjeu_case ·
50734

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#FP Passenger Service v Austrian Airlines AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Compensation of air passengers in the event of long delay of flights – Right to compensation in the event of delay – Length of delay – Time of opening of the aircraft’s doors at destination – Actual arrival time – Scheduled time of arrival – Question on which the Court has already ruled or where the answer to such a question may be clearly deduced from the case-law.#Case C-654/19.

cjeu_case ·
50735

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#FP Passenger Service v Austrian Airlines AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Compensation of air passengers in the event of long delay of flights – Right to compensation in the event of delay – Length of delay – Time of opening of the aircraft’s doors at destination – Actual arrival time – Scheduled time of arrival – Question on which the Court has already ruled or where the answer to such a question may be clearly deduced from the case-law.#Case C-654/19.

cjeu_case ·
50736

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#CC v European Parliament.#Appeal – Civil service – Judgment of the General Court ruling on remittal from the General Court after the partial annulment of the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 21 July 2016, CC v Parliament (F‑9/12 RENV, EU:F:2016:165) – Recruitment – Open competition EUR/A/151/98 – Errors made by the European Parliament in the management of the list of approved candidates – Material damage – Action to establish non-contractual liability.#Case C-612/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
50737

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#CC v European Parliament.#Appeal – Civil service – Judgment of the General Court ruling on remittal from the General Court after the partial annulment of the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 21 July 2016, CC v Parliament (F‑9/12 RENV, EU:F:2016:165) – Recruitment – Open competition EUR/A/151/98 – Errors made by the European Parliament in the management of the list of approved candidates – Material damage – Action to establish non-contractual liability.#Case C-612/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
50738

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#Criminal proceedings against TG and UF.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Article 325 TFEU – Criminal proceedings concerning offences relating to subsidy fraud funded in part from the budget of the European Union – National law not allowing State bodies to obtain, in criminal proceedings, the recovery of subsidies by way of compensation for damage caused by the offences.#Case C-603/19.

cjeu_case ·
50739

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#Criminal proceedings against TG and UF.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Špecializovaný trestný súd.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Article 325 TFEU – Criminal proceedings concerning offences relating to subsidy fraud funded in part from the budget of the European Union – National law not allowing State bodies to obtain, in criminal proceedings, the recovery of subsidies by way of compensation for damage caused by the offences.#Case C-603/19.

cjeu_case ·
50740

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 1er octobre 2020.#Entoma SAS contre Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances et Ministre de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Sécurité des denrées alimentaires – Nouveaux aliments et nouveaux ingrédients alimentaires – Règlement (CE) no 258/97 – Article 1er, paragraphe 2, sous e) – Notion d’“ingrédients alimentaires isolés à partir d’animaux” – Mise sur le marché – Insectes entiers destinés à l’alimentation humaine.#Affaire C-526/19.

cjeu_case ·