Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161354) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43245) directive (8067)
316 981 documents
49261

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 December 2020.#João Miguel Barata v European Parliament.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Certification procedure – 2016 promotion exercise – Exclusion of the appellant from the final list of officials entitled to take part in the training programme – Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Equal treatment – Rights of the defence.#Case C-259/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
49262

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 December 2020.#Siebenburgisches Nugat SRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Braşov and Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală - Direcţia Generală a Vămilor - Direcţia Regională Vamală Braşov - Biroul Vamal de Interior Sibiu.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Customs union – Common customs tariff – Combined nomenclature – Tariff headings – Subheading 8302 41 30 – Metal rail components for hanging curtains.#Case C-99/20.

cjeu_case ·
49263

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 December 2020.#Siebenburgisches Nugat SRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Braşov and Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală - Direcţia Generală a Vămilor - Direcţia Regională Vamală Braşov - Biroul Vamal de Interior Sibiu.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Customs union – Common customs tariff – Combined nomenclature – Tariff headings – Subheading 8302 41 30 – Metal rail components for hanging curtains.#Case C-99/20.

cjeu_case ·
49266

Case C-662/20 P: Appeal brought on 3 December 2020 by Bankia S.A., Asociación Española de Banca, Unicaja Banco, SA, Liberbank, S.A., Banco de Sabadell, S.A., Banco Gallego S.A., Catalunya Banc, S.A.,, Banco de Santanader, S.A., Santander Investment, S.A., Naviera Séneca, A.I.E. Caixabank, S.A., Industria de Diseño Textil, S.A., Naviera Nebulosa de Omega, A.I.E., Banco Mare Nostrum, S.A., Abanca Corporación Bancaria, S.A., Ibercaja Banco, S.A., Banco Grupo Cajatres, S.A.U., Naviera Bósforo, A.I.E., Joyería Tous, S.A., Corporación Alimentaria Guissona, S.A., Naviera Muriola, A.I.E., Poal Investments XXI, S.L., Poal Investments XXII, S.L., Naviera Cabo Vilaboa C-1658, A.I.E., Naviera Cabo Domaio, C-1659, A.I.E., Caamaño Sistemas Metálicos, S.L., Blumaq, S.A., Grupo Ibérica de Congelados, S.A., RNB, S.L., Inversiones Antaviana, S.L., Banco de Caja España de Inversiones, Salamanca y Soria, S.A.U., Banco de Albacete, S.A., Bodegas Muga, S.L., and Aluminios Cortizo, S.A.U. against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 23 September 2020 in Joined Cases T-515/13 RENV and T-719/13 RENV, Kingdom of Spain and Others v Commission

cjeu_case ·
49268

Case C-99/20: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 December 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia — Romania) — Siebenburgisches Nugat SRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Braşov, Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcţia Generală a Vămilor — Direcţia Regională Vamală Braşov — Biroul Vamal de Interior Sibiu (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Customs union — Common customs tariff — Combined nomenclature — Tariff headings — Subheading 8302 41 30 — Metal rail components for hanging curtains)

cjeu_case ·
49270

Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 3 décembre 2020.#Commission européenne contre Royaume de Belgique.#Manquement d’État – Directives 2009/72/CE et 2009/73/CE – Marché intérieur de l’électricité et du gaz naturel – Séparation effective entre la gestion des réseaux de transport d’électricité et de gaz, d’une part, et les activités de fourniture et de production, d’autre part – Mise en place d’autorités de régulation nationales indépendantes.#Affaire C-767/19.

cjeu_case ·
49271

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 December 2020.#European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directives 2009/72/EC and 2009/73/EC – Internal market in electricity and natural gas – Effective separation between the operation of electricity and gas transmission networks, on the one hand, and supply and generation activities, on the other hand – Establishment of independent national regulatory authorities.#Case C-767/19.

cjeu_case ·
49274

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 3 décembre 2020.#Ingredion Germany GmbH contre Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Environnement – Directive 2003/87/CE – Système d’échange de quotas d’émission de gaz à effet de serre – Article 3, sous h) – Nouveaux entrants – Article 10 bis – Régime transitoire d’allocation de quotas à titre gratuit – Décision 2011/278/UE – Article 18, paragraphe 1, sous c) – Niveau d’activité relatif aux combustibles – Article 18, paragraphe 2, deuxième alinéa – Valeur du coefficient d’utilisation de la capacité applicable.#Affaire C-320/19.

cjeu_case ·
49275

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 December 2020.#Ingredion Germany GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2003/87/EC – Greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme – Article 3(h) – New entrants – Article 10a – Transitional rules for free allocation of emission allowances – Decision 2011/278/EU – Article 18(1)(c) – Fuel-related activity level – Second subparagraph of Article 18(2) – Relevant capacity utilisation factor.#Case C-320/19.

cjeu_case ·
49278

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 December 2020.#Suzanne Saleh Thabet and Others v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Egypt – Freezing of funds and economic resources – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicants’ names – Decision of an authority of a third State – Obligation of the Council of the European Union to verify that that decision was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection – Obligation to state reasons.#Joined Cases C-72/19 P and C-145/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
49279

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 December 2020.#Suzanne Saleh Thabet and Others v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Egypt – Freezing of funds and economic resources – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicants’ names – Decision of an authority of a third State – Obligation of the Council of the European Union to verify that that decision was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection – Obligation to state reasons.#Joined Cases C-72/19 P and C-145/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
49280

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 December 2020.#Star Taxi App SRL v Unitatea Administrativ Teritorială Municipiul Bucureşti prin Primar General and Consiliul General al Municipiului Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 56 TFEU – Applicability – Purely internal situation – Directive 2000/31/EC – Article 2(a) – Meaning of ‘Information Society services’ – Article 3(2) and (4) – Article 4 – Applicability – Directive 2006/123/EC – Services – Chapters III (Freedom of establishment for providers) and IV (Free movement of services) – Applicability – Articles 9 and 10 – Directive (EU) 2015/1535 – Article 1(1)(e) and (f) – Meaning of ‘rule on services’ – Meaning of ‘technical regulation’ – Article 5(1) – Failure to communicate in advance – Enforceability – Activity of connecting persons wishing to make urban journeys with authorised taxi drivers, by means of a smartphone application – Classification – National regulations subjecting that activity to prior authorisation.#Case C-62/19.

cjeu_case ·