4381Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Telefónica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark LOOP – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Objective characteristics inherent in the nature of the goods and services – Sufficiently direct and specific relationship – Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision – Res judicata – Article 266 TFEU – Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Power of the General Court to alter decisions.#Case T-497/24.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4382Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#JSherwood sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark JSherWood wear it with pride – Earlier EU word marks SHER-WOOD and SHER-WOOD SL and earlier EU figurative mark SHERWOOD – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity between products – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-448/24.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4383Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#JSherwood sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark JSherWood wear it with pride – Earlier EU word marks SHER-WOOD and SHER-WOOD SL and earlier EU figurative mark SHERWOOD – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity between products – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-448/24.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4384Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Montres Tudor SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark 1926 – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-444/24.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4385Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Montres Tudor SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark 1926 – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-444/24.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4386Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2025 (Extracts).#Ffauf Italia SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark pastaZARA Sublime – Earlier EU word mark ZARA – Relative ground for refusal – No injury to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – No link between the signs – No risk of unfair advantage being taken of the mark with a reputation – Existence of due cause for the use of the mark applied for.#Case T-425/24.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4387Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2025 (Extracts).#Ffauf Italia SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark pastaZARA Sublime – Earlier EU word mark ZARA – Relative ground for refusal – No injury to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – No link between the signs – No risk of unfair advantage being taken of the mark with a reputation – Existence of due cause for the use of the mark applied for.#Case T-425/24.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4388Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2025 (Extracts).#Ffauf Italia SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark pastaZARA Sublime – Earlier EU word mark ZARA – Relative ground for refusal – No injury to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – No link between the signs – No risk of unfair advantage being taken of the mark with a reputation – Existence of due cause for the use of the mark applied for.#Case T-425/24.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4389Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#La Superquímica, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Monta – Earlier national figurative mark MONTACK – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-371/24.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4390Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#La Superquímica, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Monta – Earlier national figurative mark MONTACK – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-371/24.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4391Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Smart Kid S.A. v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to exchanges between the Commission and the Japanese authorities referring to the applicant’s product – Partial refusal of access – Exception relating to the protection of the public interest in the field of international relations – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-337/24.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4392Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Smart Kid S.A. v European Commission.#Case T-337/24.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4393Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Geos Atlas ltd. v EUCAP Somalia.#Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Provision of security services – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Selection criteria – Transparency – Equal treatment – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-300/24.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4394Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Geos Atlas ltd. v EUCAP Somalia.#Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Provision of security services – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Selection criteria – Transparency – Equal treatment – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-300/24.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4395Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#KHG GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Baltic Breeze – Earlier EU word mark HyBreeze – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-299/24.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4396Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#KHG GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Baltic Breeze – Earlier EU word mark HyBreeze – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-299/24.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4397Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for an EU trade mark consisting of a sound of a melody – Absolute ground for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-288/24.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4398Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for an EU trade mark consisting of a sound of a melody – Absolute ground for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-288/24.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4399Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Martijn Frederik Nouwen v Council of the European Union.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents concerning the work of the Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation) established by the Council – Partial refusal of access – Article 4(1)(a) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exceptions relating to the protection of the public interest as regards international relations and the financial, monetary or economic policy of the Union or of a Member State – General presumption of confidentiality – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-255/24.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4400Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Martijn Frederik Nouwen v Council of the European Union.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents concerning the work of the Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation) established by the Council – Partial refusal of access – Article 4(1)(a) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exceptions relating to the protection of the public interest as regards international relations and the financial, monetary or economic policy of the Union or of a Member State – General presumption of confidentiality – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-255/24.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.