40141Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 14 May 2019.#Eurolamp AVEE Eisagogis kai Emporias Lamptiron v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark EUROLAMP pioneers in new technology — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Mark consisting of an advertising slogan — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-466/18.cjeu_case · 14 мая 2019 г.
40142Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 14 May 2019.#Eurolamp AVEE Eisagogis kai Emporias Lamptiron v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark EUROLAMP pioneers in new technology — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Mark consisting of an advertising slogan — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-465/18.cjeu_case · 14 мая 2019 г.
40143Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 14 May 2019.#Ramón Guiral Broto v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Applications for the EU word and figurative marks Café del Sol and CAFE DEL SOL — Earlier national figurative mark Café del Sol — Proof of the existence, validity and scope of protection of the earlier mark — Translation — Rights of the defence — Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Cases T-89/18 and T-90/18.cjeu_case · 14 мая 2019 г.
40144Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 May 2019.#Zweirad-Center Stadler GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Triumph — Earlier EU word mark TRIUMPH — Partial rejection of the application for registration — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Identical signs — Enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark acquired through use — Similarity between products — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-12/18.cjeu_case · 14 мая 2019 г.
40145Case T-602/18: Order of the General Court of 14 May 2019 — Ayuntamiento de Enguera v Commission (Action for annulment — Grant agreement concluded under the Financial Instrument for the Environment (LIFE+) — Reduction of the amount of the grant — Reclassification of the action — Refusal of the applicant — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 14 мая 2019 г.
40146Case T-422/18: Order of the General Court of 14 May 2019 — RATP v Commission (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to a procedure initiated by the Commission against a Member State — Documents originating from the applicant — Third party access request — Initial decision to grant partial access — Lack of purpose — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 14 мая 2019 г.
40147Case T-466/18: Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2019 — Eurolamp v EUIPO (EUROLAMP pioneers in new technology) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark EUROLAMP pioneers in new technology — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Mark consisting of an advertising slogan — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 14 мая 2019 г.
40148Case T-465/18: Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2019 — Eurolamp v EUIPO (EUROLAMP pioneers in new technology) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark EUROLAMP pioneers in new technology — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Mark consisting of an advertising slogan — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 14 мая 2019 г.
40149Joined Cases T-89/18 and T-90/18: Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2019 — Guiral Broto v EUIPO — Gastro & Soul (Café del Sol and CAFE DEL SOL) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Applications for the EU word and figurative marks Café del Sol and CAFE DEL SOL — Earlier national figurative mark Café del Sol — Proof of the existence, validity and scope of protection of the earlier mark — Translation — Rights of the defence — Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 14 мая 2019 г.
40150Case T-12/18: Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2019 — Zweirad-Center Stadler v EUIPO — Triumph Designs (Triumph) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Triumph — Earlier EU word mark TRIUMPH — Partial rejection of the application for registration — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Identical signs — Enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark acquired through use — Similarity between products — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 14 мая 2019 г.
40151Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 May 2019.#Federación de Servicios de Comisiones Obreras (CCOO) v Deutsche Bank SAE.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Protection of the safety and health of workers — Organisation of working time — Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Directive 2003/88/EC — Articles 3 and 5 — Daily and weekly rest — Article 6 — Maximum weekly working time — Directive 89/391/EEC — Safety and health of workers at work — Requirement to set up a system enabling the duration of time worked each day by each worker to be measured.#Case C-55/18.cjeu_case · 14 мая 2019 г.
40152Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 May 2019.#Federación de Servicios de Comisiones Obreras (CCOO) v Deutsche Bank SAE.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Nacional.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Protection of the safety and health of workers — Organisation of working time — Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Directive 2003/88/EC — Articles 3 and 5 — Daily and weekly rest — Article 6 — Maximum weekly working time — Directive 89/391/EEC — Safety and health of workers at work — Requirement to set up a system enabling the duration of time worked each day by each worker to be measured.#Case C-55/18.cjeu_case · 14 мая 2019 г.
40153Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 14 May 2019.#Kamil Dziubak and Justyna Dziubak v Raiffeisen Bank International AG, prowadzący działalność w Polsce w formie oddziału pod nazwą Raiffeisen Bank International AG Oddział w Polsce, anciennement Raiffeisen Bank Polska SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 93/13/EEC — Consumer contracts — Unfair terms — Mortgage loan indexed to a foreign currency — Term relating to arrangement of the exchange rate between the currencies — Effects of a declaration that a term is unfair — Whether it is possible for the court to remedy unfair terms by having recourse to general terms of civil law — Assessment of the consumer’s interests — Continued existence of the contract without unfair terms.#Case C-260/18.cjeu_case · 14 мая 2019 г.
40154Case C-55/18: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Nacional — Spain) — Federación de Servicios de Comisiones Obreras (CCOO) v Deutsche Bank SAE (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Protection of the safety and health of workers — Organisation of working time — Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Directive 2003/88/EC — Articles 3 and 5 — Daily and weekly rest — Article 6 — Maximum weekly working time — Directive 89/391/EEC — Safety and health of workers at work — Requirement to set up a system enabling the duration of time worked each day by each worker to be measured)cjeu_case · 14 мая 2019 г.
40155Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 14 May 2019.#Carlos Moreira v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark NEYMAR — Declaration of invalidity — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-795/17.cjeu_case · 14 мая 2019 г.
40156Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 May 2019.#Commune de Fessenheim and Others v European Commission.#Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Letter sent by the Commission to the French authorities regarding the protocol for the compensation of the EDF Group in respect of the repeal of the permit to operate the Fessenheim Nuclear Power Plant — Refusal of access — Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party — Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits — General presumption of confidentiality — Overriding public interest.#Case T-751/17.cjeu_case · 14 мая 2019 г.
40157Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 May 2019.#Commune de Fessenheim and Others v European Commission.#Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Letter sent by the Commission to the French authorities regarding the protocol for the compensation of the EDF Group in respect of the repeal of the permit to operate the Fessenheim Nuclear Power Plant — Refusal of access — Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party — Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits — General presumption of confidentiality — Overriding public interest.#Case T-751/17.cjeu_case · 14 мая 2019 г.
40158Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 14 May 2019.#Marinvest d.o.o. and Porting d.o.o. v European Commission.#State aid — Pleasure port infrastructure — Concession for the management of a port and the provision of infrastructures and services without economic consideration — Decision finding that there is no State aid — Effect on trade between Member States.#Case T-728/17.cjeu_case · 14 мая 2019 г.
40159Case T-795/17: Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2019 — Moreira v EUIPO — Da Silva Santos Júnior (NEYMAR) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark NEYMAR — Declaration of invalidity — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 14 мая 2019 г.
40160Case T-751/17: Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2019 — Commune de Fessenheim and Others v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Letter sent by the Commission to the French authorities regarding the protocol for the compensation of the EDF Group in respect of the repeal of the permit to operate the Fessenheim Nuclear Power Plant — Refusal of access — Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party — Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits — General presumption of confidentiality — Overriding public interest)cjeu_case · 14 мая 2019 г.