Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
39452

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 June 2019.#Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Applications for the EU word marks 200 PANORAMICZNYCH, 300 PANORAMICZNYCH, 400 PANORAMICZNYCH, 500 PANORAMICZNYCH and 1000 PANORAMICZNYCH – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001 – No misuse of powers.#Joined Cases T-117/18 to T-121/18.

cjeu_case ·
39453

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 June 2019.#Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Applications for the EU word marks 200 PANORAMICZNYCH, 300 PANORAMICZNYCH, 400 PANORAMICZNYCH, 500 PANORAMICZNYCH and 1000 PANORAMICZNYCH – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001 – No misuse of powers.#Joined Cases T-117/18 to T-121/18.

cjeu_case ·
39455

Joined Cases T-117/18 to T-121/18: Judgment of the General Court of 26 June 2019 — Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v EUIPO (200 PANORAMICZNYCH) (EU trade mark — Applications for the EU word marks 200 PANORAMICZNYCH, 300 PANORAMICZNYCH, 400 PANORAMICZNYCH, 500 PANORAMICZNYCH and 1000 PANORAMICZNYCH — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001 — No misuse of powers)

cjeu_case ·
39457

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 June 2019.#Aleš Kuhar and Jožef Kuhar v Addiko Bank d.d.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Višje sodišče v Mariboru.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13/EEC — Proceedings for enforcement of a mortgage claim — Directly enforceable notarial instrument — Judicial review of unfair terms — Suspension of enforcement — Lack of competence of the court before which the application for enforcement has been brought — Consumer protection — Principle of effectiveness — Interpretation in conformity with EU law.#Case C-407/18.

cjeu_case ·
39459

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 26 juin 2019.#André Moens contre Ryanair Ltd.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Transport aérien – Règlement (CE) no 261/2004 – Article 5, paragraphe 3 – Indemnisation des passagers en cas de refus d’embarquement et d’annulation ou de retard important d’un vol – Portée – Exonération de l’obligation d’indemnisation – Notion de “circonstances extraordinaires” – Présence d’essence sur une piste d’un aéroport.#Affaire C-159/18.

cjeu_case ·
39460

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 June 2019.#André Moens v Ryanair Ltd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the juge de paix du troisième canton de Charleroi.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 5(3) — Compensation to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights — Scope — Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation — Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ — Presence of petrol on an airport runway.#Case C-159/18.

cjeu_case ·