Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
37361

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#Eni SpA and Shell Italia E & P SpA v Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia and Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 94/22/EC — Energy — Conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons — Royalties — Methods of calculation — QE and PFOR indices — Discriminatory nature.#Joined Cases C-364/18 and C-365/18.

cjeu_case ·
37362

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#Nationale Maatschappij der Belgische Spoorwegen (NMBS) v Mbutuku Kanyeba and Others.#References for a preliminary ruling — Rail transport — Passengers’ rights and obligations — Regulation (EC) No 1371/2007 — Article 3(8) — Transport contract — Concept — Passenger without a ticket at the time of boarding a train — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13/EEC — Article 1(2) and Article 6(1) — General conditions of carriage of a railway undertaking — Mandatory statutory or regulatory provisions — Penalty clause — Powers of the national court.#Joined Cases C-349/18 to C-351/18.

cjeu_case ·
37363

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#Nationale Maatschappij der Belgische Spoorwegen (NMBS) v Mbutuku Kanyeba and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Vredegerecht te Antwerpen.#References for a preliminary ruling — Rail transport — Passengers’ rights and obligations — Regulation (EC) No 1371/2007 — Article 3(8) — Transport contract — Concept — Passenger without a ticket at the time of boarding a train — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13/EEC — Article 1(2) and Article 6(1) — General conditions of carriage of a railway undertaking — Mandatory statutory or regulatory provisions — Penalty clause — Powers of the national court.#Joined Cases C-349/18 to C-351/18.

cjeu_case ·
37364

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#Rose Vision, SL v European Commission.#Appeal — Projects financed by the European Union in the area of research — Seventh Framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Grant agreements relating to the FIRST, FutureNEM, sISI, 4NEM and SFERA projects — Audits finding irregularities in the implementation of certain projects — European Commission decisions suspending payment of the amounts payable under other projects — Action for compensation and annulment.#Case C-346/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
37365

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#Rose Vision, SL v European Commission.#Appeal — Projects financed by the European Union in the area of research — Seventh Framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Grant agreements relating to the FIRST, FutureNEM, sISI, 4NEM and SFERA projects — Audits finding irregularities in the implementation of certain projects — European Commission decisions suspending payment of the amounts payable under other projects — Action for compensation and annulment.#Case C-346/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
37367

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#Alain Flausch and Others v Ypourgos Perivallontos kai Energeias and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Assessment of the effects of certain projects on the environment — Public participation in decision-making and access to justice — Date from which the time for bringing proceedings starts to run.#Case C-280/18.

cjeu_case ·
37368

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 7 novembre 2019.#Adriano Guaitoli e.a. contre easyJet Airline Co. Ltd.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Compétence judiciaire, reconnaissance et exécution des décisions en matière civile et commerciale – Règlement (UE) no 1215/2012 – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous a) – Juridiction compétente en matière contractuelle – Règles communes en matière d’indemnisation et d’assistance des passagers en cas de refus d’embarquement et d’annulation ou de retard important d’un vol – Règlement (CE) no 261/2004 – Articles 5, 7, 9 et 12 – Convention de Montréal – Compétence – Articles 19 et 33 – Demande d’indemnisation et de réparation du préjudice résultant de l’annulation et du retard de vols.#Affaire C-213/18.

cjeu_case ·
37369

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#Adriano Guaitoli and Others v easyJet Airline Co. Ltd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Roma.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Article 7(1)(a) — Competent court in matters relating to a contract — Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Articles 5, 7, 9 and 12 — Montreal Convention — Jurisdiction — Articles 19 and 33 — Application for compensation and compensation for damage resulting from the cancellation and delay of flights.#Case C-213/18.

cjeu_case ·
37370

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 7 novembre 2019.#Asociación Española de la Industria Eléctrica (UNESA) e.a. contre Administración General del Estado.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Principe du pollueur-payeur – Directive 2000/60/CE – Article 9, paragraphe 1 – Récupération des coûts des services liés à l’utilisation de l’eau – Règles communes pour le marché intérieur de l’électricité – Directive 2009/72/CE – Article 3, paragraphe 1 – Principe de non-discrimination – Article 107, paragraphe 1, TFUE – Aide d’État – Redevance sur l’utilisation des eaux intérieures pour la production d’énergie électrique – Redevance due uniquement par les producteurs d’énergie hydroélectrique opérant sur des bassins hydrographiques intercommunautaires.#Affaires jointes C-105/18 à C-113/18.

cjeu_case ·
37371

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#Asociación Española de la Industria Eléctrica (UNESA) and Others v Administración General del Estado.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Polluter pays principle — Directive 2000/60/EC — Article 9(1) — Recovery of the costs of water services — Common rules for the internal market in electricity — Directive 2009/72/EC — Article 3(1) — Principle of non-discrimination — Article 107(1) TFEU — State aid — Tax on the use of inland waters for the production of electricity — Tax imposed only on hydroelectricity producers operating on inter-communities river basins.#Joined Cases C-105/18 to C-113/18.

cjeu_case ·
37372

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 7 novembre 2019.#Asociación Española de la Industria Eléctrica (UNESA) et Endesa Generación SA contre Administración General del Estado et Iberdrola Generación Nuclear SAU et Endesa Generación SA et Iberdrola Generación Nuclear SAU contre Administración General del Estado.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Principe du pollueur-payeur – Règles communes pour le marché intérieur de l’électricité – Directive 2009/72/CE – Article 3, paragraphes 1 et 2 – Principe de non-discrimination – Financement du déficit tarifaire – Impôts auxquels sont assujetties uniquement les entreprises qui utilisent l’énergie nucléaire pour produire de l’électricité.#Affaires jointes C-80/18 à C-83/18.

cjeu_case ·
37373

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#Asociación Española de la Industria Eléctrica (UNESA) and Others v Administración General del Estado and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Polluter-pays principle — Common rules for the internal market in electricity — Directive 2009/72/EC — Article 3(1) and (2) — Principle of non-discrimination — Financing the tariff deficit — Taxes applying only to undertakings which use nuclear energy to produce electricity.#Joined Cases C-80/18 to C-83/18.

cjeu_case ·
37374

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 7 novembre 2019.#SC Petrotel-Lukoil SA contre Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili et Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Generală de Soluţionare a Contestaţiilor.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Taxation des produits énergétiques et de l’électricité – Directive 2003/96/CE – Article 21, paragraphe 3 – Absence de fait générateur de la taxe – Consommation de produits énergétiques dans l’enceinte d’un établissement produisant de tels produits – Article 2, paragraphe 3 – Obligation d’obtenir le classement de produits énergétiques aux fins de la fixation des droits d’accises – Taux d’imposition applicable auxdits produits – Principe de proportionnalité.#Affaire C-68/18.

cjeu_case ·
37375

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#SC Petrotel-Lukoil SA v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală - Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili and Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Generală de Soluţionare a Contestaţiilor.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation of energy products and electricity — Directive 2003/96/EC — Article 21(3) — No chargeable event giving rise to taxation — Consumption of energy products on a site that produces such products — Article 2(3) — Obligation to obtain a classification for energy products in order to determine the level of excise duty — Tax rate applicable to those products — Principle of proportionality.#Case C-68/18.

cjeu_case ·
37376

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 7 November 2019.#Criminal proceedings against VW.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Instrucción de Badalona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive 2013/48/EU — Article 3(2) — Right of access to a lawyer — Circumstances in which the right of access to a lawyer must be guaranteed — Non-appearance — Derogations from the right of access to a lawyer — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to effective judicial protection.#Case C-659/18.

cjeu_case ·
37377

Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 7 November 2019.#Finanzamt Kaufbeuren mit Außenstelle Füssen v Golfclub Schloss Igling e.V.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 132(1)(m) – Exemption for ‘certain services closely linked to sport or physical education’ – Direct effect – Concept of ‘non-profit-making organisations’.#Case C-488/18.

cjeu_case ·
37378

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 7 November 2019.#AS „PrivatBank” v Finanšu un kapitāla tirgus komisija.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Payment services in the internal market — Directive 2007/64/EC — Material and personal scope — Payment services provided in a currency other than the euro or the currency of a Member State outside the euro area — Payment services provided by a credit institution — Non-execution or defective execution of a payment order — Person liable — Prudential supervision procedure — Complaint procedures — Out-of-court-redress — Competent authorities.#Case C-480/18.

cjeu_case ·
37379

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 7 November 2019.#Libuše Králová v Primera Air Scandinavia.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 8.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Article 5(1) — Jurisdiction in matters relating to a contract — Articles 15 to 17 — Jurisdiction over consumer contracts — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Articles 6 and 7 — Right to compensation in the case where a flight is subject to a long delay — Contract for carriage combining travel and accommodation concluded between the passenger and a travel agency — Action for compensation brought against the air carrier which is not a party to that contract — Directive 90/314/EEC — Package travel.#Case C-215/18.

cjeu_case ·
37380

Case C-555/18: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad — Bulgaria) — K.H.K. v B.A.C., E.E.K. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 655/2014 — European Account Preservation Order — Article 5(a) — Obtention procedure — Article 4(8) to (10) — Definition of ‘judgment’, ‘court settlement’ and ‘authentic instrument’ — National order for payment against which an objection may be lodged — Article 18(1) — Time limits — Article 45 — Exceptional circumstances — Definition)

cjeu_case ·