32241Case C-597/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 12 November 2020 — Polskie Linie Lotnicze ‘LOT’ SA v Budapest Főváros Kormányhivatalacjeu_case · 12 novembre 2020
32242Case C-96/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 12 November 2020 — DuoDecad Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatóságacjeu_case · 12 novembre 2020
32243Case C-594/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Markkinaoikeus (Finland) lodged on 12 November 2020 — Kuluttaja-asiamies v MiGame Oycjeu_case · 12 novembre 2020
32244Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 12 November 2020.#L and P.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.#References for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 1(3) – Article 6(1) – Surrender procedures between Member States – Conditions for execution – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Second paragraph of Article 47 – Right of access to an independent and impartial tribunal – Systemic or generalised deficiencies – Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ – Taking into consideration developments after the issue of the European arrest warrant concerned – Obligation on the executing judicial authority to verify specifically and precisely whether there are substantial grounds for believing that the person concerned will run a real risk of breach of his or her right to a fair trial in the event of surrender.#Case C-354/20 PPU and C-412/20 PPU.cjeu_case · 12 novembre 2020
32245Case C-268/20: Order of the President of the Court of 12 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción No 6 de Ceuta — Spain) — XV v Cajamar Caja Rural S.C.C.cjeu_case · 12 novembre 2020
32246Case C-85/20 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 November 2020 — Lazarus Szolgáltató és Kereskedelmi Kft. v European Commission (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — State aid — Aid implemented by Hungary in favour of undertakings employing disabled workers — Alleged decisions of the European Commission declaring the measure compatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — Deadline for lodging an appeal — Starting point — Awareness of the existence of the contested measure — Reasonable time in which to request the full text thereof — Definition of ‘actionable measure’ within the meaning of Article 263 TFEU — Inadmissibility of the application at first instance — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)cjeu_case · 12 novembre 2020
32247Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 November 2020.#European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Judgment of the Court establishing a failure to fulfil obligations – Non-compliance – Free movement of capital – Article 63 TFEU – Incompatibility of Belgian tax provisions concerning income from immovable property located abroad – Article 260(2) TFEU – Application for an order to pay a penalty payment and a lump sum.#Case C-842/19.cjeu_case · 12 novembre 2020
32248Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 November 2020.#European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Judgment of the Court establishing a failure to fulfil obligations – Non-compliance – Free movement of capital – Article 63 TFEU – Incompatibility of Belgian tax provisions concerning income from immovable property located abroad – Article 260(2) TFEU – Application for an order to pay a penalty payment and a lump sum.#Case C-842/19.cjeu_case · 12 novembre 2020
32249Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 12 novembre 2020.#Commission européenne contre République d'Autriche.#Manquement d’État – Directive 2007/59/CE – Certification des conducteurs de train – Article 3, sous a) – Autorité nationale compétente – Directive 2004/49/CE – Article 16, paragraphe 1 – Autorité de sécurité – Désignation de plusieurs autorités.#Affaire C-796/19.cjeu_case · 12 novembre 2020
32250Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 November 2020.#European Commission v Republic of Austria.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2007/59/EC – Certification of train drivers – Article 3(a) – Competent national authority – Directive 2004/49/EC – Article 16(1) – Safety authority – Designation of several authorities.#Case C-796/19.cjeu_case · 12 novembre 2020
32251Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 12 novembre 2020.#ITH Comercial Timişoara SRL contre Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală - Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti et Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti – Administraţia Sector 1 a Finanţelor Publice.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Système commun de taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Déduction de la taxe payée en amont – Abandon de l’activité initialement envisagée – Régularisation des déductions de la TVA payée en amont – Activité immobilière.#Affaire C-734/19.cjeu_case · 12 novembre 2020
32252Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 November 2020.#ITH Comercial Timişoara SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală - Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti and Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti – Administraţia Sector 1 a Finanţelor Publice.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti.#Request for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Deduction of input tax – Abandonment of the activity initially intended – Adjustment of deductions of input VAT – Real estate activity.#Case C-734/19.cjeu_case · 12 novembre 2020
32253Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 November 2020.#Bruno Gollnisch v European Parliament.#Appeal – Law governing the institutions – European Parliament – Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery of sums unduly paid – Effects of a judgment of the Court.#Case C-676/19 P.cjeu_case · 12 novembre 2020
32254Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 November 2020.#Bruno Gollnisch v European Parliament.#Appeal – Law governing the institutions – European Parliament – Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery of sums unduly paid – Effects of a judgment of the Court.#Case C-676/19 P.cjeu_case · 12 novembre 2020
32255Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 November 2020.#Stephan Fleig v European External Action Service.#Case C-446/19 P.cjeu_case · 12 novembre 2020
32256Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 12 novembre 2020.#Bulstrad Vienna Insurance Group АD contre Olympic Insurance Company Ltd.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 2009/138/CE – Article 274 – Droit applicable à la procédure de liquidation des entreprises d’assurance – Retrait de l’agrément d’une compagnie d’assurance – Désignation d’un liquidateur provisoire – Notion de “décision d’ouvrir une procédure de liquidation d’une entreprise d’assurance” – Absence de décision juridictionnelle d’ouvrir la procédure de liquidation dans l’État membre d’origine – Suspension des procédures juridictionnelles à l’égard de l’entreprise d’assurance concernée dans les autres États membres que l’État membre d’origine de celle-ci.#Affaire C-427/19.cjeu_case · 12 novembre 2020
32257Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 November 2020.#„Bulstrad Vienna Insurance Group“ АD v Olympic Insurance Company Ltd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2009/138/EC – Article 274 – Law applicable to winding-up proceedings with regard to insurance undertakings – Withdrawal of the authorisation of an insurance company – Appointment of a provisional liquidator – Concept of ‘decision to open winding-up proceedings with regard to an insurance undertaking’ – Absence of a court decision to open winding-up proceedings in the home Member State – Stay of court proceedings with regard to the insurance undertaking concerned in Member States other than its home Member State.#Case C-427/19.cjeu_case · 12 novembre 2020
32258Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 November 2020.#Ralph Pethke v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Civil Service – Official – Internal reorganisation of the services of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) – Redeployment – Article 7 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Covert penalty – Interests of the service – Equivalence of posts – Obligation to state reasons – Distortion of the facts – Psychological harassment – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union.#Case C-382/19 P.cjeu_case · 12 novembre 2020
32259Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 November 2020.#Ralph Pethke v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Civil Service – Official – Internal reorganisation of the services of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) – Redeployment – Article 7 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Covert penalty – Interests of the service – Equivalence of posts – Obligation to state reasons – Distortion of the facts – Psychological harassment – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union.#Case C-382/19 P.cjeu_case · 12 novembre 2020
32260Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 12 novembre 2020.#Sonaecom SGPS SA contre Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Sixième directive 77/388/CEE – Article 4 – Notion d’“assujetti” – Société holding mixte – Article 17 – Droit à déduction de la TVA payée en amont – TVA acquittée en amont par une société holding mixte pour des services de conseil relatifs à une étude de marché en vue de l’éventuelle acquisition de participations au sein d’autres sociétés – Abandon des projets d’acquisition – TVA acquittée en amont sur une commission bancaire relative à l’organisation et au montage d’un emprunt obligataire destiné à doter les filiales de moyens nécessaires pour effectuer des investissements – Investissements non réalisés.#Affaire C-42/19.cjeu_case · 12 novembre 2020