Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
21643

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#SV v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Performance appraisal – Promotion – Administrative review – Special procedure applicable to appraisal decisions – Rule of correspondence between the administrative review and the subsequent application – Intensity of the review – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Manifest error of assessment – Liability.#Case T-311/21.

cjeu_case ·
21644

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#SV v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Performance appraisal – Promotion – Administrative review – Special procedure applicable to appraisal decisions – Rule of correspondence between the administrative review and the subsequent application – Intensity of the review – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Manifest error of assessment – Liability.#Case T-311/21.

cjeu_case ·
21645

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#Giorgio Basaglia v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Access to documents – Documents relating to research and technological development projects – Decision limiting the request for access and partially refusing access – Partial annulment by the General Court of that decision – Convictions by national courts – Unlawfulness of the conduct complained of – Causal link.#Case T-257/21.

cjeu_case ·
21646

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#Giorgio Basaglia v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Access to documents – Documents relating to research and technological development projects – Decision limiting the request for access and partially refusing access – Partial annulment by the General Court of that decision – Convictions by national courts – Unlawfulness of the conduct complained of – Causal link.#Case T-257/21.

cjeu_case ·
21647

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#Ondřej Múka v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to State aid control procedures – Refusal to grant access – Third indent of Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – General presumption of non-disclosure – Overriding public interest.#Case T-214/21.

cjeu_case ·
21648

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#Ondřej Múka v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to State aid control procedures – Refusal to grant access – Third indent of Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – General presumption of non-disclosure – Overriding public interest.#Case T-214/21.

cjeu_case ·
21649

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#Magnetec GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for an EU trade mark consisting of a shade of light blue – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Limitation of goods designated by the trade mark application – Article 49(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Requirements of clarity and precision – Article 33(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-168/21.

cjeu_case ·
21650

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#Magnetec GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for an EU trade mark consisting of a shade of light blue – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Limitation of goods designated by the trade mark application – Article 49(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Requirements of clarity and precision – Article 33(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-168/21.

cjeu_case ·