9921Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 October 2024.#TotalEnergies Marketing Nederland NV v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU – Refusal of access – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party – General presumption of confidentiality – Obligation to identify the documents covered by the presumption and to provide a list of them.#Case T-332/22.cjeu_case · 2 октября 2024 г.
9922Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products (CCCME) and Others v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in China – Imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Standing to bring proceedings – Representative association of exporters – Article 2(6a) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Construction of the normal value – Choice of appropriate representative country – Article 2(10) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Adjustments – Non-cooperation – Article 18 of Regulation 2016/1036 – Calculation of the dumping margin for the non-sampled cooperating exporting producers – Definition of the product concerned – Injury to the Union industry – Assessment of injury by segment – Causal link – Calculation of price undercutting and injury margin – Macroeconomic indicators – Procedural rights – Confidential treatment.#Case T-263/22.cjeu_case · 2 октября 2024 г.
9923Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products (CCCME) and Others v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in China – Imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Standing to bring proceedings – Representative association of exporters – Article 2(6a) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Construction of the normal value – Choice of appropriate representative country – Article 2(10) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Adjustments – Non-cooperation – Article 18 of Regulation 2016/1036 – Calculation of the dumping margin for the non-sampled cooperating exporting producers – Definition of the product concerned – Injury to the Union industry – Assessment of injury by segment – Causal link – Calculation of price undercutting and injury margin – Macroeconomic indicators – Procedural rights – Confidential treatment.#Case T-263/22.cjeu_case · 2 октября 2024 г.
9924Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 October 2024 (Extracts).#Pharol, SGPS, SA v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Portuguese and Spanish telecommunications markets – Non-compete clause with respect to the Iberian market inserted in the contract for the acquisition by Telefónica of Portugal Telecom’s share in the Brazilian mobile telephone operator Vivo – Annulment in part of the initial decision – Decision amending the amount of the fine – Res judicata – Non-adoption of a supplementary statement of objections – Determination of the value of sales – Exclusion of sales of services for which the parties are not in potential competition.#Case T-181/22.cjeu_case · 2 октября 2024 г.
9925Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 October 2024 (Extracts).#Pharol, SGPS, SA v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Portuguese and Spanish telecommunications markets – Non-compete clause with respect to the Iberian market inserted in the contract for the acquisition by Telefónica of Portugal Telecom’s share in the Brazilian mobile telephone operator Vivo – Annulment in part of the initial decision – Decision amending the amount of the fine – Res judicata – Non-adoption of a supplementary statement of objections – Determination of the value of sales – Exclusion of sales of services for which the parties are not in potential competition.#Case T-181/22.cjeu_case · 2 октября 2024 г.
9926Case T-828/22: Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – ACE v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on the provision of legal advisory services to the Russian Government and entities established in Russia – Obligation to state reasons – Fundamental role of lawyers in a democratic society – Right of lawyers to provide legal advisory services – Right to be advised by a lawyer – Articles 47 and 52(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)cjeu_case · 2 октября 2024 г.
9927Case T-798/22: Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – Ordre des avocats à la cour de Paris and Couturier v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on the provision of legal advisory services to the Russian Government and entities established in Russia – Obligation to state reasons – Fundamental role of lawyers in a democratic society – Right of lawyers to provide legal advisory services – Right to be advised by a lawyer – Articles 7, 47 and 52(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Independence of lawyers)cjeu_case · 2 октября 2024 г.
9928Case T-797/22: Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – Ordre néerlandais des avocats du barreau de Bruxelles and Others v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on the provision of legal advisory services to the Russian Government and entities established in Russia – Fundamental role of lawyers in a democratic society – Right of lawyers to provide legal advisory services – Right to be advised by a lawyer – Articles 7 and 47 and Article 52(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Independence of lawyers – Rule of law – Proportionality – Legal certainty)cjeu_case · 2 октября 2024 г.
9929Case T-669/22: Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – IP v Commission (Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Termination of the contract without notice – OLAF investigation – Reimbursement of medical expenses – Article 266 TFEU – Decision adopted to implement a judgment of the General Court – Measures necessary to implement a judgment delivered in an action for annulment – Res judicata – Procedural defect – Article 12 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Consultation of the Disciplinary Board – Rights of the defence – Liability – Material and non-material damage)cjeu_case · 2 октября 2024 г.
9930Case T-589/22: Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – Silgan Holdings and Others v Commission (Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Metal packaging market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Cooperation between the Commission and the national competition authorities – Initiation of an investigation procedure by the Commission at the request of a national competition authority – Period for re-allocation – Obligation to state reasons – Legitimate expectations – Principle of subsidiarity – Rights of the defence – Proportionality – Principle of good administration – Counterclaim for re-evaluation of the amount of the fine following a settlement procedure)cjeu_case · 2 октября 2024 г.
9931Case T-587/22: Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – Crown Holdings and Crown Cork & Seal Deutschland v Commission (Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Metal packaging market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Cooperation between the Commission and the national competition authorities – Initiation of an investigation procedure by the Commission at the request of a national competition authority – Period for re-allocation – Obligation to state reasons – Legitimate expectations – Principle of subsidiarity – Rights of the defence – Proportionality – Principle of good administration – Counterclaim for re-evaluation of the amount of the fine following a settlement procedure)cjeu_case · 2 октября 2024 г.
9932Case T-448/22: Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – PW v EEAS (Civil service – Contract staff – Refusal to reimburse annual travel expenses for dependent children – Article 8(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Action for annulment – Act adversely affecting an official – Decision which definitively lays down the position of the administration – Admissibility – Principle of sound administration – Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff)cjeu_case · 2 октября 2024 г.
9933Case T-332/22: Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – TotalEnergies Marketing Nederland v Commission (Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU – Refusal to grant access – Exception relating to protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – Exception relating to protection of the commercial interests of a third party – General presumption of confidentiality – Obligation to identify the documents covered by the presumption and submit a list of them)cjeu_case · 2 октября 2024 г.
9934Case T-263/22: Judgment of the General Court 2 October 2024 – CCCME and Others v Commission (Dumping – Imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in China – Imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Standing to bring proceedings – Representative association of exporters – Article 2(6a) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Construction of the normal value – Choice of appropriate representative country – Article 2(10) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Adjustments – Non-cooperation – Article 18 of Regulation 2016/1036 – Calculation of the dumping margin for the non-sampled cooperating exporting producers – Definition of the product concerned – Injury to the Union industry – Assessment of injury by segment – Causal link – Calculation of price undercutting and injury margin – Macroeconomic indicators – Procedural rights – Confidential treatment)cjeu_case · 2 октября 2024 г.
9935Case T-181/22: Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – Pharol v Commission (Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Portuguese and Spanish telecommunications markets – Non-compete clause with respect to the Iberian market inserted in the contract for the acquisition by Telefónica of Portugal Telecom’s share in the Brazilian mobile telephone operator Vivo – Annulment in part of the initial decision – Decision amending the amount of the fine – Res judicata – Non-adoption of a supplementary statement of objections – Determination of the value of sales – Exclusion of sales of services for which the parties are not in potential competition)cjeu_case · 2 октября 2024 г.
9936Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 October 2024 (Extracts).#European Food SA and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Articles 107 and 108 TFEU – Bilateral investment treaty – Arbitration clause – Romania – Accession to the European Union – Repeal of a tax incentives scheme prior to accession – Arbitral award granting payment of damages after accession – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – First paragraph of Article 351 TFEU – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of ‘State aid’ – Advantage – Selective nature – Whether imputable to the State – Whether compatible with the internal market – Aid facilitating the economic development of disadvantaged regions – Recovery – Concept of ‘economic unit’ – Legitimate expectations – Right to be heard.#Cases T-624/15 RENV, T-694/15 RENV and T-704/15 RENV.cjeu_case · 2 октября 2024 г.
9937Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 October 2024 (Extracts).#European Food SA and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Articles 107 and 108 TFEU – Bilateral investment treaty – Arbitration clause – Romania – Accession to the European Union – Repeal of a tax incentives scheme prior to accession – Arbitral award granting payment of damages after accession – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – First paragraph of Article 351 TFEU – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of ‘State aid’ – Advantage – Selective nature – Whether imputable to the State – Whether compatible with the internal market – Aid facilitating the economic development of disadvantaged regions – Recovery – Concept of ‘economic unit’ – Legitimate expectations – Right to be heard.#Cases T-624/15 RENV, T-694/15 RENV and T-704/15 RENV.cjeu_case · 2 октября 2024 г.
9938Cases T-624/15 RENV, T-694/15 RENV and T-704/15 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – European Food and Others v Commission (State aid – Articles 107 and 108 TFEU – Bilateral investment treaty – Arbitration clause – Romania – Accession to the European Union – Repeal of a tax incentives scheme prior to accession – Arbitral award granting payment of damages after accession – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – First paragraph of Article 351 TFEU – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of State aid – Advantage – Selective nature – Whether imputable to the State – Whether compatible with the internal market – Aid facilitating the economic development of disadvantaged regions – Recovery – Concept of economic unit – Legitimate expectations – Right to be heard)cjeu_case · 2 октября 2024 г.
9939Case T-509/24: Action brought on 1 October 2024 – Research Investments and Others v European Public Prosecutor’s Officecjeu_case · 1 октября 2024 г.
9940Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 October 2024.#CN v Cofidis Magyarországi Fióktelepe.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 93/13/EEC – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in credit agreements denominated in a foreign currency concluded with consumers – Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court and the link between the provisions of European Union law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-47/24.cjeu_case · 1 октября 2024 г.