9121Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#Skins IP Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark S SKINS – Genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-559/23.cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9122Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#G.M.P. Group Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing vehicle wheel rims – Earlier design – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Overall impression – Degree of freedom of the designer – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-545/23.cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9123Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#G.M.P. Group Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing vehicle wheel rims – Earlier design – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Overall impression – Degree of freedom of the designer – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-545/23.cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9124Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of an inhaler – Absolute ground for invalidity – Sign which consists exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result – Article 7(1)(e)(ii) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(e)(ii) and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-524/23.cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9125Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of an inhaler – Absolute ground for invalidity – Sign which consists exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result – Article 7(1)(e)(ii) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(e)(ii) and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-524/23.cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9126Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#SC Certinvest SRL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Tina – Earlier EU figurative mark Bibi & Tina – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-444/23.cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9127Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#SC Certinvest SRL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Tina – Earlier EU figurative mark Bibi & Tina – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-444/23.cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9128Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#Chiquita Brands LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark representing a blue and yellow oval – Absolute ground for invalidity – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-426/23.cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9129Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#Chiquita Brands LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark representing a blue and yellow oval – Absolute ground for invalidity – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-426/23.cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9130Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#WS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Recruitment – Selection procedure EXT/22/08/AD 6/DTD – Business Analyst – Decision not to admit the applicant to the next stage of the procedure – Action for annulment – Rule of correspondence – Article 91(2) of the Staff Regulations – Admissibility – Manifest error of assessment – Liability.#Case T-221/23.cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9131Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#WS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Recruitment – Selection procedure EXT/22/08/AD 6/DTD – Business Analyst – Decision not to admit the applicant to the next stage of the procedure – Action for annulment – Rule of correspondence – Article 91(2) of the Staff Regulations – Admissibility – Manifest error of assessment – Liability.#Case T-221/23.cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9132Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 November 2024.#Laurent Merlin and Others v European Commission.#Action for failure to act – State aid – Common fisheries policy – Funding for shipowners fishing with beam trawl using electrical pulse current – Complaint – Admissibility – Definition of a position by the Commission – Clear and definitive nature of the position adopted – Competence of the Commission – Obligation to act.#Case T-141/23.cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9133Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 November 2024.#Laurent Merlin and Others v European Commission.#Action for failure to act – State aid – Common fisheries policy – Funding for shipowners fishing with beam trawl using electrical pulse current – Complaint – Admissibility – Definition of a position by the Commission – Clear and definitive nature of the position adopted – Competence of the Commission – Obligation to act.#Case T-141/23.cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9134Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#Rems Kargins v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents originating from a Member State – Documents relating to the Commission’s intervention in a dispute before the Supreme Court of Latvia – List of documents covered by the application for access to documents – Partial refusal of access – Objection by a Member State to disclosure of documents – Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings – Obligation to state reasons – Presumption of legality attaching to EU measures – Review by the institution and by the EU Courts of the Member State’s grounds for objection – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Time limits provided for in Regulation No 1049/2001.#Case T-110/23.cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9135Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#Rems Kargins v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents originating from a Member State – Documents relating to the Commission’s intervention in a dispute before the Supreme Court of Latvia – List of documents covered by the application for access to documents – Partial refusal of access – Objection by a Member State to disclosure of documents – Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings – Obligation to state reasons – Presumption of legality attaching to EU measures – Review by the institution and by the EU Courts of the Member State’s grounds for objection – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Time limits provided for in Regulation No 1049/2001.#Case T-110/23.cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9136Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Preparatory documents of the Commission relating to a request for internal review of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2049 as regards the renewal of the approval of the active substance cypermethrin – Partial refusal to grant access – Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings.#Case T-104/23.cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9137Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Preparatory documents of the Commission relating to a request for internal review of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2049 as regards the renewal of the approval of the active substance cypermethrin – Partial refusal to grant access – Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings.#Case T-104/23.cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9138Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#Aesculap AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Applications for EU figurative marks AESKUCARE Food Intolerance and AESKUCARE Allergy and EU word mark AESKUCARE – Earlier EU and national word marks AESCULAP – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Cross-claims.#Joined Cases T-64/23 to T-66/23.cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9139Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#Aesculap AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Applications for EU figurative marks AESKUCARE Food Intolerance and AESKUCARE Allergy and EU word mark AESKUCARE – Earlier EU and national word marks AESCULAP – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Cross-claims.#Joined Cases T-64/23 to T-66/23.cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9140Case T-1169/23: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Interapothek v EUIPO – Q4 Media (miababy) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark miababy – Earlier EU figurative mark ia BABY interapothek – Relative grounds for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.