Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
6561

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 30 April 2025.#X v Maahanmuuttovirasto.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Protocol (No 22) on the position of Denmark annexed to the EU Treaty and to the FEU Treaty – Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark on the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection made by a third-country national – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Article 18(1)(d) – Obligations of the Member State responsible – Obligation to take back a third-country national whose application was rejected and who made an application in another Member State – Concept of ‘application (for international protection)’ – Special status of the Kingdom of Denmark – Concept of ‘rejection’ – Decision not to extend or renew a temporary residence document – Not included.#Case C-790/23.

cjeu_case ·
6563

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 30 April 2025.#JU v Spitalul Clinic de Pneumoftiziologie Iaşi.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Iaşi.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 89/391/EEC – Safety and health of workers at work – Article 9 – Employers’ obligations – Classification of workplaces according to whether they are exposing workers to risk factors to their safety and health – Article 11(6) – Proceedings before the authority responsible for safety and health protection at work – Effective judicial protection.#Case C-678/23.

cjeu_case ·
6564

Case C-745/23, Alenopik: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus – Estonia) – Maksu- ja Tolliamet v UT (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) 2018/1672 – Article 3(1) – Sum of cash not declared – Determining the value of a sum of cash denominated in foreign currencies – Exchange rate of a currency not published by the European Central Bank – Ukrainian hryvnia)

cjeu_case ·
6565

Case C-699/23, Caja Rural de Navarra: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia no 8 de Donostia – San Sebastián – Spain) – FG v Caja Rural de Navarra SCC (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Articles 3 to 5 – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Mortgage loan agreements – Term concerning loan arrangement fees – Application seeking a declaration of invalidity of that term – Assessment of the unfairness of contractual terms – Plainness and intelligibility of the terms)

cjeu_case ·
6566

Case C-630/23, AxFina Hungary (Continued existence of the contract): Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 30 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria – Hungary) – ZH, KN v AxFina Hungary Zrt. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Leasing agreement denominated in a foreign currency – Articles 6 and 7 – Unfair term placing the exchange rate risk on the consumer – Effects of a finding that the term is unfair – Invalidity of the contract – Effects of the annulment of the contract in its entirety)

cjeu_case ·
6567

Case C-602/23, Finanzamt für Großbetriebe: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof – Austria) – Finanzamt für Großbetriebe (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of capital – Restrictions – Tax on income from capital – Undertaking for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) – Legal personality – National legislation providing that UCITS do not have legal personality – Tax transparency of UCITS – Tax treatment of foreign undertakings that are comparable to UCITS but that have legal personality – Whether a cross-border situation is comparable to a domestic situation)

cjeu_case ·
6568

Joined Cases C-554/23 P and C-568/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 April 2025 – Fertilizers Europe and Commission v Nevinnomysskiy Azot and NAK Azot (Appeal – Dumping – Imports of ammonium nitrate originating in Russia – Definitive anti-dumping duties – Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Request for an expiry review of anti-dumping measures – Time limit laid down in that provision for making such a request – Sufficiency of the evidence – Information submitted after the expiry of that time limit)

cjeu_case ·
6569

Case C-536/23, Mutua Madrileña Automovilista: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 30 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I – Germany) – Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Mutua Madrileña Automovilista (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Jurisdiction in matters relating to insurance – Article 11(1)(b) – Article 13(2) – Action brought by an injured party directly against an insurer – Concept of injured party – Official injured in a road traffic accident – Continued remuneration during that official’s incapacity to work – Member State acting as the employer subrogated to that official’s rights to compensation – Jurisdiction of the courts for the place where the claimant is domiciled – Place where the administrative body employing that official has its seat)

cjeu_case ·
6570

Case C-386/23, Novel Nutriology: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof – Germany) – Novel Nutriology GmbH v Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb eV (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 – Nutrition and health claims made on foods – Article 10(1) and (3) – Specific conditions applicable to health claims – Articles 13 and 14 – Lists of authorised health claims – Article 28(5) and (6) – Transitional measures – Advertising promoting a food supplement using health claims relating to botanical substances contained in that supplement – Health claims the evaluation of which has been suspended by the European Commission – Applicability of Regulation No 1924/2006)

cjeu_case ·
6571

Joined Cases C-313/23, C-316/23 and C-332/23, Inspektorat kam Visshia sadeben savet: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 April 2025 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad – Bulgaria) – in the proceedings brought by Inspektorat kam Visshia sadeben savet (References for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Judicial independence – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law – Judicial body competent to propose the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against judges, public prosecutors and investigating magistrates, with a view to the imposition of disciplinary penalties – Members of the judicial body remaining in office after the expiry of their term of office – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Data security – Access by a judicial body to data relating to the bank accounts of judges and public prosecutors and of their family members – Judicial authorisation for the purpose of lifting banking secrecy – Court authorising the lifting of banking secrecy – Article 4(7) – Concept of controller – Article 51 – Concept of supervisory authority)

cjeu_case ·
6572

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark Vagisan – Earlier national word marks VAGISIL – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and from Euratom – End of the transition period during the court proceedings.#Case T-679/20.

cjeu_case ·
6573

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark Vagisan – Earlier national word marks VAGISIL – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and from Euratom – End of the transition period during the court proceedings.#Case T-679/20.

cjeu_case ·
6574

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 April 2025.#Banco Cooperativo Español, SA v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and Monetary Union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2016 ex ante contributions – Exclusion of certain liabilities from the calculation of the ex ante contributions – Article 5(1)(a), (b) and (f) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63 – Plea of illegality – Principle of non-retroactivity – Non-contractual liability – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Unjust enrichment.#Case T-499/20.

cjeu_case ·
6575

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 April 2025.#Banco Cooperativo Español, SA v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and Monetary Union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2016 ex ante contributions – Exclusion of certain liabilities from the calculation of the ex ante contributions – Article 5(1)(a), (b) and (f) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63 – Plea of illegality – Principle of non-retroactivity – Non-contractual liability – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Unjust enrichment.#Case T-499/20.

cjeu_case ·
6576

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#bonnanwalt Vermögens- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark tagesschau – Genuine use of a mark – First subparagraph of Article 18(1), and Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-83/20 RENV.

cjeu_case ·
6578

Case T-679/20: Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2025 – Dr. August Wolff v EUIPO – Combe International (Vagisan) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark Vagisan – Earlier national word marks VAGISIL – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and from Euratom – End of the transition period during the court proceedings)

cjeu_case ·
6579

Case T-499/20: Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2025 – Banco Cooperativo Español v SRB (2016 ex ante contributions) (Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2016 ex ante contributions – Exclusion of certain liabilities from the calculation of the ex ante contributions – Article 5(1)(a), (b) and (f) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63 – Plea of illegality – Principle of non-retroactivity – Non-contractual liability – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Unjust enrichment)

cjeu_case ·