4341Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 11 September 2025.#NE and Others v An Coimisiún Pleanála, anciennement An Bord Pleanála and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Irlande).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 92/43/EEC – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Article 12 – System of strict protection for certain animal species – Article 16 – Decision to grant a derogation in anticipation of a planning permission application for a project covered by Directive 2011/92/EU – Article 11 – Aarhus Convention – Article 9 – Procedural autonomy – Principles of equivalence and effectiveness – Derogation decision classified as an autonomous legal act – Procedural rules providing for a three-month period for seeking the annulment of a derogation licence.#Case C-58/24.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4342Opinion of Advocate General Spielmann delivered on 11 September 2025.#Dürr Dental SE v Cattani Deutschland Helmes GmbH & Co. KG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medical devices – Regulation (EU) 2017/745 – CE marking of a medical device falling under risk class IIa – Oil-free dry air compressors for the production of compressed air for dental treatment – Making available on the market – Obligations of distributors – Verification of the classification as a ‘medical device’ where the manufacturer has affixed a CE marking to the device in question as ‘machinery’.#Case C-10/24.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4343Case C-406/24, VertretungsNetz: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bezirksgericht Linz – Austria) – RC v VertretungsNetz (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Principles of EU law – National procedure for appointing a representative for a person with a mental disability – Difficulty in finding an appropriate representative – Doubts as to the judicial nature of the procedure before the body making the reference)cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4344Case C-384/24, Russisch-Kirgizisch Ontwikkelingsfonds: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State – Belgium) – Russisch-Kirgizisch Ontwikkelingsfonds v Belgische Staat (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Article 2 – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Derogations – Article 4(1)(a), (b) and (d) – Release of certain frozen funds for specific expenses – Payment of a roll fee and a flat-rate contribution for the purpose of instituting an action for annulment against a decision implementing that regulation – Included)cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4345Case C-341/24, Duca di Salaparuta: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione – Italy) – Duca di Salaparuta SpA v Ministero dell’Agricoltura, della Sovranità alimentare e delle Foreste and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common organisation of the market in wine – Community framework for the protection of wine names – Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 – Article 54 – Quality wines produced in specified regions (quality wines psr) – Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 – Article 43(2) and Article 51 – Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 – Article 118k(2) and Article 118s – Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Article 101(2) and Article 107 – Protection, under EU law, of quality wines psr recognised under national law – Conflict between a protected wine name and an earlier well-known mark containing a word identical to that name – Allegedly misleading name – Transitional regime – Automatic extension of protection – Complete nature of the system of protection – Legal certainty)cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4346Case C-215/24, Fira: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto – Juízo Local Criminal de Vila Nova de Gaia – Portugal) – in the proceedings relating to the execution of the European arrest warrant issued against YX (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant issued for the purpose of executing a custodial sentence – Article 4(6) – Ground for optional non-execution of the European arrest warrant – Objective of social rehabilitation – Residence of the convicted person – Enforcement of that sentence by the executing State in accordance with its domestic law – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters for the purpose of their enforcement in another Member State – Suspension of the enforcement of a custodial sentence ordered by a court of the executing Member State – Article 8 – Obligation, for the executing State, to recognise the judgment and enforce the sentence – Article 17 – Option, for the executing State, to determine the procedures for enforcement)cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4347Case C-115/24, Österreichische Zahnärztekammer: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof – Austria) – UJ v Österreichische Zahnärztekammer (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public health – Cross-border healthcare – Directive 2011/24/EU – Article 3(d) and (e) – Provision of healthcare through telemedicine – Concept of telemedicine – Cross-border healthcare provided through telemedicine – Complex medical treatment that includes healthcare provided in person and through telemedicine – Member State of treatment – Directive 2000/31/EC – Information society service – Directive 2005/36/EC – Professional qualifications – Freedom to provide services – Scope – Article 56 TFEU)cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4348Case C-38/24, Bervidi: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione – Italy) – G.L. v AB SpA (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities – Articles 2, 5 and 7 – Articles 21, 24 and 26 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Article 1 – Article 2(1) and (2)(b) – Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of disability – Indirect discrimination – Difference of treatment in respect of an employee who does not himself or herself have a disability but cares for his or her child who has a disability – Article 5 – Employer’s obligation to make reasonable accommodation)cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4349Case C-5/24, Pauni: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Ravenna – Italy) – P.M. v S. Snc (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Article 2 – Discrimination based on disability – Dismissal of a worker on sick leave – National legislation laying down the same limit of number of days of sick leave per calendar year for all workers in the same sector of activity – Article 5 – Reasonable accommodation)cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4350Ordonnance de rectification du 11 septembre 2025.#Prokuratura Rejonowa Warszawa-Ursynów w Warszawie contre P.B. et R.S.#Rectification d’arrêt.#Affaires jointes C-646/23 et C-661/23.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4351Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#Juan Antonio and María Consuelo v Banco Santander, SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 2014/59/EU – Resolution of credit institutions and investment firms – General principles – Article 34(1)(a) and (b) – Bail in – Effects – Article 53(1) and (3) – Write-down of capital instruments – Points (b) and (c) of the first subparagraph of Article 60(2) – Safeguard measures for shareholders – Articles 73 to 75 – Pre-emptive subscription rights – Directive 2003/71/EC – Directive 2004/109/EC – Protection of the rights of shareholders and creditors – Flawed and incorrect information provided in the prospectus to be published, inter alia, when securities are offered to the public – Information about issuers whose securities are already admitted to trading – Action for damages – Action for a declaration of nullity in respect of the purchase agreement – Actions brought against the universal successor of the credit institution subject to a resolution decision.#Case C-447/23.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4352Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#Juan Antonio and María Consuelo v Banco Santander, SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Santa Coloma de Farners.#Case C-447/23.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4353Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#Ministerio Fiscal v MSIG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement – Article 54 – Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle ne bis in idem – Concept of ‘same acts’ – Member of a terrorist association found guilty, in a Member State, of involvement in that association with a view to preparing an act of terrorism – Prosecution in another Member State for the same terrorist acts.#Case C-802/23.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4354Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#Ministerio Fiscal v MSIG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Nacional.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement – Article 54 – Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle ne bis in idem – Concept of ‘same acts’ – Member of a terrorist association found guilty, in a Member State, of involvement in that association with a view to preparing an act of terrorism – Prosecution in another Member State for the same terrorist acts.#Case C-802/23.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4355Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 11 septembre 2025.#Cairo Network Srl e.a. contre Ministero delle Imprese e del Made in Italy e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Réseaux et services de communications électroniques – Directives 2002/20/CE, 2002/21/CE et 2002/77/CE – Droits d’utilisation de radiofréquences de diffusion numérique terrestre pour la radio et la télévision – Conversion de droits d’utilisation – Attribution de droits d’utilisation – Protection juridictionnelle – Indépendance des autorités réglementaires nationales.#Affaires jointes C-764/23 à C-766/23.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4356Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#Cairo Network Srl and Others v Ministero delle Imprese e del Made in Italy and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications networks and services – Directives 2002/20/EC, 2002/21/EC and 2002/77/EC – Rights to use digital terrestrial broadcasting radio frequencies for radio and television – Conversion of rights of use – Granting of rights of use – Judicial protection – Independence of national regulatory authorities.#Joined Cases C-764/23 to C-766/23.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4357Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#D.E. v Banco Santander, SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2014/59/EU – Resolution of credit institutions and investment firms – General principles – Article 34(1)(a) and (b) – Bail-in – Write-down of capital instruments – Effects – Article 53(1) and (3) – Article 60(2), first subparagraph, points (b) and (c) – Protection of the rights of shareholders and creditors – Purchase of capital instruments – Flawed and incorrect information provided in the prospectus to be published, inter alia, when securities are offered to the public – Action for a declaration of nullity in respect of the agreement for the purchase of capital instruments – Action for damages – Actions brought before the adoption of resolution measures.#Case C-687/23.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4358Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#D.E. v Banco Santander, SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2014/59/EU – Resolution of credit institutions and investment firms – General principles – Article 34(1)(a) and (b) – Bail-in – Write-down of capital instruments – Effects – Article 53(1) and (3) – Article 60(2), first subparagraph, points (b) and (c) – Protection of the rights of shareholders and creditors – Purchase of capital instruments – Flawed and incorrect information provided in the prospectus to be published, inter alia, when securities are offered to the public – Action for a declaration of nullity in respect of the agreement for the purchase of capital instruments – Action for damages – Actions brought before the adoption of resolution measures.#Case C-687/23.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4359Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#Republic of Austria v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Article 107(3)(c) and Article 108 TFEU – Aid planned for the development of two new nuclear reactors at the site at Paks (Hungary) – Direct award of the construction contract – Directive 2014/25/EU – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market subject to compliance with certain commitments – Compliance of the aid with EU law other than State aid law – Object of the aid – Aspects that are inextricably linked to the aid – Parallel conduct of infringement proceedings – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-59/23 P.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4360Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#Republic of Austria v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Article 107(3)(c) and Article 108 TFEU – Aid planned for the development of two new nuclear reactors at the site at Paks (Hungary) – Direct award of the construction contract – Directive 2014/25/EU – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market subject to compliance with certain commitments – Compliance of the aid with EU law other than State aid law – Object of the aid – Aspects that are inextricably linked to the aid – Parallel conduct of infringement proceedings – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-59/23 P.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.