41121Case T-75/19: Order of the General Court of 13 March 2019 — Comune di Milano v Parliament and Council (Declining of jurisdiction)cjeu_case · 13 марта 2019 г.
41122Case C-228/19 P: Appeal brought on 13 March 2019 by ETI Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AȘ against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 17 January 2019 in Case T-368/18, ETI Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AȘ v EUIPO — Grupo Bimbo (ETI Bumbo)cjeu_case · 13 марта 2019 г.
41123Case C-223/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Wiener Neustadt (Austria) lodged on 13 March 2019 — YS v NKcjeu_case · 13 марта 2019 г.
41124Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 13 March 2019.#Wirecard Technologies GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark supr — Earlier Benelux word mark Zupr — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 60(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-297/18.cjeu_case · 13 марта 2019 г.
41125Case T-297/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 March 2019 — Wirecard Technologies v EUIPO — Striatum Ventures (supr) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark supr — Earlier Benelux word mark Zupr — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 60(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 13 марта 2019 г.
41126Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 13 mars 2019.#Procédure pénale contre B. S.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité – Droits d’accises sur l’alcool et les boissons alcooliques – Directive 92/83/CEE – Article 2 – Notion de “bière” – Boisson produite à partir du moût obtenu d’un mélange contenant plus de glucose que de malt – Nomenclature combinée – Positions 2203 (bières de malt) ou 2206 (autres boissons fermentées).#Affaire C-195/18.cjeu_case · 13 марта 2019 г.
41127Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 March 2019.#Criminal proceedings against B.S.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Piotrkowie Trybunalskim.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Excise duties on alcohol and alcoholic beverages — Directive 92/83/EEC — Article 2 — Definition of ‘beer’ — Beverage produced from wort obtained from a mixture containing more glucose than malt — Combined Nomenclature — Heading 2203 (beer made from malt) or 2206 (other fermented beverages).#Case C-195/18.cjeu_case · 13 марта 2019 г.
41128Case C-195/18: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Piotrkowie Trybunalskim — Poland) — Criminal proceedings against B. S. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Excise duties on alcohol and alcoholic beverages — Directive 92/83/EEC — Article 2 — Definition of ‘beer’ — Beverage produced from wort obtained from a mixture containing more glucose than malt — Combined Nomenclature — Heading 2203 (beer made from malt) or 2206 (other fermented beverages))cjeu_case · 13 марта 2019 г.
41129Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 13 March 2019.#AlzChem AG v European Commission.#Appeal — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Third indent of Article 4(2) — General presumption of confidentiality of documents relating to an investigation procedure in the field of State aid — Scope.#Case C-666/17 P.cjeu_case · 13 марта 2019 г.
41130Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 13 mars 2019.#Skatteverket contre Srf konsulterna AB.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 53 – Prestations de services consistant à donner accès à des manifestations éducatives – Lieu des opérations imposables.#Affaire C-647/17.cjeu_case · 13 марта 2019 г.
41131Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 March 2019.#Skatteverket v Srf konsulterna AB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 53 — Supply of services in respect of admission to educational events– Place of taxable transactions.#Case C-647/17.cjeu_case · 13 марта 2019 г.
41132Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 13 mars 2019.#E. contre Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Politique relative à l’immigration – Droit au regroupement familial – Directive 2003/86/CE – Exclusions du champ d’application de la directive – Article 3, paragraphe 2, sous c) – Exclusion des personnes bénéficiaires d’une protection subsidiaire – Extension par le droit national du droit au regroupement familial auxdites personnes – Compétence de la Cour – Article 11, paragraphe 2 – Absence de pièces justificatives officielles attestant des liens familiaux – Explications considérées comme étant insuffisamment plausibles – Obligations incombant aux autorités des États membres d’effectuer des démarches complémentaires – Limites.#Affaire C-635/17.cjeu_case · 13 марта 2019 г.
41133Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 March 2019.#E. v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Immigration policy — Right to family reunification — Directive 2003/86/EC — Exclusions from the scope of the directive — Article 3(2)(c) — Exclusion of persons benefiting from subsidiary protection — Extension of the right to family reunification to those persons under national law — Jurisdiction of the Court — Article 11(2) — Lack of official documentary evidence of the family relationship — Explanations regarded as insufficiently plausible — Obligations on the authorities of the Member States to take additional steps — Limits.#Case C-635/17.cjeu_case · 13 марта 2019 г.
41134Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 13 mars 2019.#Gemeinsamer Betriebsrat EurothermenResort Bad Schallerbach GmbH contre EurothermenResort Bad Schallerbach GmbH.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Libre circulation des travailleurs – Article 45 TFUE – Règlement (UE) no 492/2011 – Article 7, paragraphe 1 – Interdiction des discriminations sur le fondement de la nationalité – Droits aux congés annuels payés en fonction de l’ancienneté du travailleur auprès de l’employeur – Prise en compte seulement partielle des périodes d’activité antérieures accomplies auprès d’autres employeurs – Droit social – Disparité entre les régimes et les législations des États membres.#Affaire C-437/17.cjeu_case · 13 марта 2019 г.
41135Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 March 2019.#Gemeinsamer Betriebsrat EurothermenResort Bad Schallerbach GmbH v EurothermenResort Bad Schallerbach GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Free movement of workers — Article 45 TFEU — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7(1) — Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of nationality — Right to paid annual leave based on the seniority of the worker with the employer — Account taken only in part of previous periods of service completed with other employers — Social law — Disparity between the schemes and legislation of the Member States.#Case C-437/17.cjeu_case · 13 марта 2019 г.
41136Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 13 mars 2019.#République de Pologne contre Parlement européen et Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Recours en annulation – Directive (EU) 2016/2284 – Réduction des émissions nationales de certains polluants atmosphériques – Adoption d’actes de droit de l’Union – Déroulement de la procédure législative – Article 4, paragraphe 3, TUE – Principe de coopération loyale – Exercice effectif du pouvoir d’appréciation du législateur de l’Union – Analyse d’impact – Évaluation suffisante des effets de l’acte attaqué – Article 5, paragraphe 4, TUE – Principe de proportionnalité – Article 4, paragraphe 2, TUE – Égalité des États membres devant les traités – Article 191, paragraphe 2, TFUE – Politique de l’Union dans le domaine de l’environnement – Prise en compte de la diversité des régions de l’Union européenne – Contrôle juridictionnel.#Affaire C-128/17.cjeu_case · 13 марта 2019 г.
41137Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 March 2019.#Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment — Directive (EU) 2016/2284 — Reduction of national emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants — Adoption of EU legal acts — Course of the legislative procedure — Article 4(3) TEU — Principle of sincere cooperation — Actual exercise of the EU legislature’s discretion — Impact assessment — Sufficient assessment of the effects of the contested measure — Article 5(4) TEU — Principle of proportionality — Article 4(2) TEU — Equality of Member States before the Treaties — Article 191(2) TFEU — Environmental policy of the European Union — Consideration of the diversity of the regions of the European Union — Judicial review.#Case C-128/17.cjeu_case · 13 марта 2019 г.
41138Case C-666/17 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 13 March 2019 — AlzChem AG v European Commission (Appeal — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Third indent of Article 4(2) — General presumption of confidentiality of documents relating to an investigation procedure in the field of State aid — Scope)cjeu_case · 13 марта 2019 г.
41139Case C-647/17: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen — Sweden) — Skatteverket v Srf konsulterna AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 53 — Supply of services in respect of admission to educational events — Place of taxable transactions)cjeu_case · 13 марта 2019 г.
41140Case C-635/17: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem — Netherlands) — E. v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Immigration policy — Right to family reunification — Directive 2003/86/EC — Exclusions from the scope of the directive — Article 3(2)(c) — Exclusion of persons benefiting from subsidiary protection — Extension of the right to family reunification to those persons under national law — Jurisdiction of the Court — Article 11(2) — Lack of official documentary evidence of the family relationship — Explanations regarded as insufficiently plausible — Obligations on the authorities of the Member States to take additional steps — Limits)cjeu_case · 13 марта 2019 г.