38481Case T-649/18: Order of the General Court of 11 September 2019 — ruwido austria v EUIPO (transparent pairing) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark transparent pairing — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38482Case T-545/18: Judgment of the General Court of 11 September 2019 — YL v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2017 promotion procedure — Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 7 with effect from 1 January 2017 — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Article 9(3) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations — Misuse of powers — Disciplinary measure)cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38483Case T-286/18: Judgment of the General Court of 11 September 2019 — Azarov v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38484Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#HX v Council of the European Union.#Appeal — Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against influential businessmen and women engaged in activities in Syria — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded.#Case C-540/18 P.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38485Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#HX v Council of the European Union.#Appeal — Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against influential businessmen and women engaged in activities in Syria — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded.#Case C-540/18 P.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38486Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 11 septembre 2019.#DW contre Nobel Plastiques Ibérica SA.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Directive 2000/78/CE – Égalité de traitement en matière d’emploi et de travail – Article 2, paragraphe 2, sous b), ii), et article 5 – Interdiction de toute discrimination fondée sur un handicap – Travailleur particulièrement sensible aux risques professionnels, au sens du droit national – Existence d’un “handicap” – Licenciement pour raisons objectives fondé sur les critères de la productivité, de la polyvalence dans les postes de travail de l’entreprise ainsi que de l’absentéisme – Désavantage particulier pour les personnes handicapées – Discrimination indirecte – Aménagements raisonnables – Personne qui n’est pas compétente, ni capable, ni disponible pour remplir les fonctions essentielles du poste concerné.#Affaire C-397/18.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38487Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#DW v Nobel Plastiques Ibérica SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social n° 3 de Barcelona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2000/78/EC — Equal treatment in employment and occupation — Article 2(2)(b)(ii) and Article 5 — Prohibition of any discrimination based on a disability — Worker particularly susceptible to occupational risks within the meaning of national law — Existence of a ‘disability’ — Dismissal for objective reasons based on criteria of productivity, multi-skilling in the undertaking’s posts and absenteeism — Particular disadvantage for disabled persons — Indirect discrimination — Reasonable accommodation — Individual who is not competent, capable and available to perform the essential functions of the post concerned.#Case C-397/18.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38488Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 11 septembre 2019.#Lexitor Sp. z o.o. contre Spółdzielcza Kasa Oszczędnościowo - Kredytowa im. Franciszka Stefczyka e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Contrats de crédit aux consommateurs – Directive 2008/48/CE – Article 16, paragraphe 1 – Remboursement anticipé – Droit du consommateur à une réduction du coût total du crédit correspondant aux intérêts et aux frais dus pour la durée résiduelle du contrat.#Affaire C-383/18.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38489Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#Lexitor Sp. z o.o v Spółdzielcza Kasa Oszczędnościowo - Kredytowa im. Franciszka Stefczyka and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy Lublin-Wschód w Lublinie z siedzibą w Świdniku.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Credit agreements for consumers — Directive 2008/48/EC — Article 16(1) — Early repayment — Right of the consumer to a reduction in the total cost of the credit, consisting of the interest and the costs for the remaining duration of the contract.#Case C-383/18.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38490Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#Antonio Romano and Lidia Romano v DSL Bank – a branch of DB Privat- und Firmenkundenbank AG, formerly DSL Bank – ein Geschäftsbereich der Deutsche Postbank AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2002/65/EC – Distance consumer loan agreement – Right of withdrawal – Exercising the right of withdrawal after the contract has been performed in full at the consumer’s express request – Communication to the consumer of information regarding the right of withdrawal.#Case C-143/18.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38491Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#Antonio Romano and Lidia Romano v DSL Bank – a branch of DB Privat- und Firmenkundenbank AG, formerly DSL Bank – ein Geschäftsbereich der Deutsche Postbank AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Bonn.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2002/65/EC – Distance consumer loan agreement – Right of withdrawal – Exercising the right of withdrawal after the contract has been performed in full at the consumer’s express request – Communication to the consumer of information regarding the right of withdrawal.#Case C-143/18.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38492Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 11 septembre 2019.#Caseificio Sociale San Rocco Soc. coop. arl e.a. contre Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA) et Regione Veneto.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Secteur du lait et des produits laitiers – Quotas – Prélèvement supplémentaire – Règlement (CEE) no 3950/92 – Article 2 – Perception du prélèvement par l’acheteur – Livraisons excédant la quantité de référence disponible du producteur – Montant du prix du lait – Application obligatoire d’une retenue – Remboursement du montant de prélèvement trop-perçu – Règlement (CE) no 1392/2001 – Article 9 – Acheteur – Non-respect de l’obligation d’effectuer le prélèvement supplémentaire – Producteurs – Non-respect de l’obligation de versement mensuel – Protection de la confiance légitime.#Affaire C-46/18.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38493Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#Caseificio Sociale San Rocco Soc. coop. arl and Others v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA) and Regione Veneto.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Milk and milk products sector — Quotas — Additional levy — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Article 2 — Collection of the levy by the purchaser — Deliveries exceeding the available reference quantity of the producer — Amount of the price of milk — Mandatory application of a deduction — Reimbursement of the amount of overpaid levy — Regulation (EC) No 1392/2001 — Article 9 — Purchaser — Non‑compliance with obligation to implement the additional levy — Producers — Non-compliance with obligation to make monthly payments — Protection of legitimate expectations.#Case C-46/18.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38494Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 11 September 2019.#MSD Animal Health Innovation GmbH and Intervet International BV v European Medicines Agency.#Appeal — Access to documents of EU institutions, bodies, offices or agencies — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — First indent of Article 4(2) — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests — Article 4(3) — Protection of the decision-making process — Documents submitted to the European Medicines Agency in the context of a marketing authorisation application for a veterinary medicinal product — Decision to grant a third party access to the documents — General presumption of confidentiality — No obligation for an EU institution, body, office or agency to apply a general presumption of confidentiality.#Case C-178/18 P.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38495Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 11 September 2019.#PTC Therapeutics International Ltd v European Medicines Agency.#Appeal — Access to documents of EU institutions, bodies, offices or agencies — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — First indent of Article 4(2) — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests — Article 4(3) — Protection of the decision-making process — Documents submitted to the European Medicines Agency in the context of a marketing authorisation application for a medicinal product for human use — Decision to grant a third party access to the documents — General presumption of confidentiality — No obligation for an EU institution, body, office or agency to apply a general presumption of confidentiality.#Case C-175/18 P.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38496Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 11 September 2019.#Sole-Mizo Zrt. and Dalmandi Mezőgazdasági Zrt. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Szegedi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság and Szekszárdi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Right to deduct input tax – Refunding of excess VAT – Late repayment – Calculation of interest – Procedure for awarding interest due because of the unavailability of excess deductible VAT retained in breach of EU law and interest due as a result of delay by the tax authority in paying an amount due – Principles of effectiveness and equivalence.#Joined Cases C-13/18 and C-126/18.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38497Case C-540/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 September 2019 — HX v Council of the European Union (Appeal – Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic – Measures directed against influential businessmen and women engaged in activities in Syria – Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded)cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38498Case C-397/18: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social No 3 de Barcelona — Spain) — DW v Nobel Plastiques Ibérica SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Article 2(2)(b)(ii) and Article 5 – Prohibition of any discrimination based on a disability – Worker particularly susceptible to occupational risks within the meaning of national law – Existence of a ‘disability’ – Dismissal for objective reasons based on criteria of productivity, multi-skilling in the undertaking’s posts and absenteeism – Particular disadvantage for disabled persons – Indirect discrimination – Reasonable accommodation – Individual who is not competent, capable and available to perform the essential functions of the post concerned)cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38499Case C-383/18: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy Lublin-Wschód w Lublinie z siedzibą w Świdniku — Poland) — Lexitor sp. z o.o. v Spółdzielcza Kasa Oszczędnościowo — Kredytowa im. Franciszka Stefczyka, Santander Consumer Bank S.A. and mBank S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Credit agreements for consumers – Directive 2008/48/EC – Article 16(1) – Early repayment – Right of the consumer to a reduction in the total cost of the credit, consisting of the interest and the costs for the remaining duration of the contract)cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38500Case C-143/18: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Bonn — Germany) — Antonio Romano, Lidia Romano v DSL Bank — eine Niederlassung der DB Privat- und Firmenkundenbank AG, formerly DSL Bank — a business division of Deutsche Postbank AG (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2002/65/EC – Distance consumer loan contract – Right of withdrawal – Exercising the right of withdrawal after the contract has been performed in full at the consumer’s express request – Communication to the consumer of information regarding the right of withdrawal)cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.