Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
38322

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 18 septembre 2019.#AQ et DN contre Ministre de l'Action et des Comptes publics.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité directe – Directive 90/434/CEE – Directive 2009/133/CE – Article 8 – Plus-values afférentes à des opérations d’échange de titres – Cession de titres reçus lors de l’échange – Plus-value placée en report d’imposition – Imposition des actionnaires – Imposition selon des règles d’assiette et de taux distinctes – Abattements d’assiette tenant compte de la durée de détention des titres.#Affaires jointes C-662/18 et C-672/18.

cjeu_case ·
38323

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 September 2019.#AQ and DN v Ministre de l'Action et des Comptes publics.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#References for a preliminary ruling — Direct taxation — Directive 90/434/EEC — Directive 2009/133/EC — Article 8 — Capital gains relating to exchange of securities transactions — Transfer of securities received at the time of the exchange — Capital gain on which tax has been deferred — Taxation of the shareholders — Taxation on the basis of different bases of assessment and rate rules — Reductions of the basis of assessment taking into account the period for which securities have been held.#Joined Cases C-662/18 and C-672/18.

cjeu_case ·
38324

Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 18 septembre 2019.#José Manuel Ortiz Mesonero contre UTE Luz Madrid Centro.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Directive 2010/18/UE – Accord-cadre révisé sur le congé parental – Réglementation nationale subordonnant l’octroi du congé parental à la réduction du temps de travail, avec une diminution proportionnelle du salaire – Travail posté avec un horaire variable – Demande du travailleur d’effectuer son travail à un horaire fixe pour s’occuper de ses enfants mineurs – Directive 2006/54/CE – Égalité des chances et égalité de traitement entre hommes et femmes en matière d’emploi et de travail – Discrimination indirecte – Irrecevabilité partielle.#Affaire C-366/18.

cjeu_case ·
38325

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 September 2019.#José Manuel Ortiz Mesonero v UTE Luz Madrid Centro (integrada por las mercantiles SICE SA, URBALUX SA IMESAPI SA EXTRALUX SA y CITELUM IBÉRICA SA).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social n° 33 de Madrid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2010/18/EU — Revised Framework Agreement on parental leave — National legislation making the granting of parental leave conditional on a reduction in working time, with a proportional reduction in pay — Shift work with variable hours — Request of the worker to perform his work at a fixed schedule to care for his minor children — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in employment and occupation — Indirect discrimination — Partial inadmissibility.#Case C-366/18.

cjeu_case ·
38326

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 September 2019.#VIPA Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft. v Országos Gyógyszerészeti és Élelmezés-egészségügyi Intézet.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Cross-border healthcare – Directive 2011/24/EU – Articles 3(k) and 11(1) – Prescription – Definition – Recognition of a prescription issued in another Member State by an authorised person – Conditions – Free movement of goods – Prohibition of measures having equivalent effect to quantitative restrictions on exports – Articles 35 and 36 TFEU – Restriction on the dispensing by a pharmacy of prescription-only medicinal products – Order form issued in another Member State – Justification – Protection of human health and human life – Directive 2001/83/EC – Second paragraph of Article 81 – Supply of medicinal products to the public of a Member State.#Case C-222/18.

cjeu_case ·
38327

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 September 2019.#VIPA Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft. v Országos Gyógyszerészeti és Élelmezés-egészségügyi Intézet.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Cross-border healthcare – Directive 2011/24/EU – Articles 3(k) and 11(1) – Prescription – Definition – Recognition of a prescription issued in another Member State by an authorised person – Conditions – Free movement of goods – Prohibition of measures having equivalent effect to quantitative restrictions on exports – Articles 35 and 36 TFEU – Restriction on the dispensing by a pharmacy of prescription-only medicinal products – Order form issued in another Member State – Justification – Protection of human health and human life – Directive 2001/83/EC – Second paragraph of Article 81 – Supply of medicinal products to the public of a Member State.#Case C-222/18.

cjeu_case ·
38328

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 18 septembre 2019.#Skarb Pánstwa Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej – Generalny Dyrektor Dróg Krajowych i Autostrad contre Stephan Riel.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Règlement (UE) no 1215/2012 – Compétence judiciaire en matière civile et commerciale – Champ d’application – Article 1er, paragraphe 2, sous b) – Faillites, concordats et autres procédures analogues – Exclusion – Action visant à faire constater l’existence d’une créance aux fins de son enregistrement dans le cadre d’une procédure d’insolvabilité – Application du règlement (CE) no 1346/2000 – Article 41 – Contenu de la production d’une créance – Procédure principale et procédure secondaire d’insolvabilité – Litispendance et connexité – Application par analogie de l’article 29, paragraphe 1, du règlement no 1215/2012 – Inadmissibilité.#Affaire C-47/18.

cjeu_case ·
38329

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 September 2019.#Skarb Pánstwa Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej – Generalny Dyrektor Dróg Krajowych i Autostrad v Stephan Riel, en qualité d’administrateur judiciaire de Alpine Bau GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters — Scope — Article 1(2)(b) — Bankruptcy, proceedings relating to the winding-up of insolvent companies or other legal persons, judicial arrangements, compositions and analogous proceedings — Not included — Action for a declaration that a claim exists for the purposes of its registration in insolvency proceedings — Application of Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 — Article 41 — Content of the lodgement of a claim — Main and secondary insolvency proceedings — Lis pendens and related actions — Application by analogy of Article 29(1) of Regulation No 1215/2012 — Inadmissibility.#Case C-47/18.

cjeu_case ·
38330

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 18 septembre 2019.#Tiroler Gebietskrankenkasse contre Michael Moser.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Sécurité sociale – Travailleurs migrants – Règlement (CE) no 987/2009 – Article 60 – Prestations familiales – Droit au paiement de la différence entre le montant de l’allocation parentale versée dans l’État membre prioritairement compétent et l’allocation de garde d’enfant prévue par l’État membre compétent à titre subsidiaire.#Affaire C-32/18.

cjeu_case ·
38331

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 September 2019.#Tiroler Gebietskrankenkasse v Michael Moser.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Migrant workers — Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 — Article 60 — Family benefits — Right to payment of the difference between the parental allowance paid in the Member State having primary competence and the childcare allowance provided by the Member State having secondary competence.#Case C-32/18.

cjeu_case ·
38332

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 18 September 2019.#Procureur-Generaal bij de Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Designs — Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Article 90(1) — Provisional and protective measures — Jurisdiction of national courts of first instance — Exclusive jurisdiction of the courts designated in that provision.#Case C-678/18.

cjeu_case ·
38333

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 18 September 2019.#AR v Cooper International Spirits LLC and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks — Directive 2008/95/EC — Article 5(1)(b) — First subparagraph of Article 10(1) — Article 12(1) — Revocation of a trade mark for lack of genuine use — Right of the trade mark proprietor to plead infringement of his or her exclusive rights as a result of the use by a third party of an identical or similar sign during the period preceding the date on which the revocation took effect.#Case C-622/18.

cjeu_case ·
38334

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 18 September 2019.#Exportslachterij J. Gosschalk en Zn. BV and Others v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven.#References for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 — Article 27(1) and (4) — Points 1 and 2 of Annex VI — Official controls on feed and food — Financing — Fees payable in relation to official controls — Calculation — Concept of ‘staff involved in the official controls’ — Inclusion of administrative and support staff — Possibility of charging for quarter-hour periods requested by the slaughterhouse for the purposes of official controls but not worked — Conditions.#Joined Cases C-477/18 and C-478/18.

cjeu_case ·
38335

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 18 September 2019.#Club de Variedades Vegetales Protegidas v Adolfo Juan Martínez Sanchís.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Community plant variety rights — Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 — Article 13(2) and (3) — Effects of community plant variety rights — Cumulative protection scheme — Planting of variety constituents and harvesting the fruit — Distinction between acts effected in respect of variety constituents and those concerning harvested material — Concept of ‘unauthorised use of variety constituents’ — Article 95 — Provisional protection.#Case C-176/18.

cjeu_case ·
38336

Joined Cases C-662/18 and C-672/18: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 September 2019 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — AQ (C-662/18), DN (C-672/18) v Ministre de l’Action and des Comptes publics (References for a preliminary ruling — Direct taxation — Directive 90/434/EEC — Directive 2009/133/EC — Article 8 — Capital gains relating to exchange of securities transactions — Transfer of securities received at the time of the exchange — Capital gain on which tax has been deferred — Taxation of the shareholders — Taxation on the basis of different bases of assessment and rate rules — Reductions of the basis of assessment taking into account the period for which securities have been held)

cjeu_case ·
38337

Joined Cases C-366/18: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social No 33 de Madrid — Spain) — José Manuel Ortiz Mesonero v UTE Luz Madrid Centro (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2010/18/EU — Revised Framework Agreement on parental leave — National legislation making the granting of parental leave conditional on a reduction in working time, with a proportional reduction in pay — Shift work with variable hours — Request of the worker to perform his work at a fixed schedule to care for his minor children — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in employment and occupation — Indirect discrimination — Partial inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
38338

Case C-222/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — VIPA Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft. v Országos Gyógyszerészeti és Élelmezés-egészségügyi Intézet (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Cross-border healthcare — Directive 2011/24/EU — Articles 3(k) and 11(1) — Prescription — Definition — Recognition of a prescription issued in another Member State by an authorised person — Conditions — Free movement of goods — Prohibition of measures having equivalent effect to quantitative restrictions on exports — Articles 35 and 36 TFEU — Restriction on the dispensing by a pharmacy of prescription-only medicinal products — Order form issued in another Member State — Justification — Protection of human health and human life — Directive 2001/83/EC — Second paragraph of Article 81 — Supply of medicinal products to the public of a Member State)

cjeu_case ·
38339

Case C-47/18: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien — Austria) — Skarb Pánstwa Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej — Generalny Dyrektor Dróg Krajowych i Autostrad v Stephan Riel, acting as liquidator of Alpine Bau GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters — Scope — Article 1(2)(b) — Bankruptcy, proceedings relating to the winding-up of insolvent companies or other legal persons, judicial arrangements, compositions and analogous proceedings — Not included — Action for a declaration that a claim exists for the purposes of its registration in insolvency proceedings — Application of Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 — Article 41 — Content of the lodgement of a claim — Main and secondary insolvency proceedings — Lis pendens and related actions — Application by analogy of Article 29(1) of Regulation No 1215/2012 — Inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
38340

Case C-32/18: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Tiroler Gebietskrankenkasse v Michael Moser (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Migrant workers — Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 — Article 60 — Family benefits — Right to payment of the difference between the parental allowance paid in the Member State having primary competence and the childcare allowance provided by the Member State having secondary competence)

cjeu_case ·