37061Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 27 November 2019.#Luisa Izuzquiza and Arne Semsrott v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to a naval operation carried out by Frontex in the central Mediterranean in 2017 — Vessels deployed — Refusal of access — Article 4(1)(a) of Regulation No 1049/2001 — Exception relating to the protection of the public interest in the field of public security.#Case T-31/18.cjeu_case · 27 ноября 2019 г.
37062Case T-31/18: Judgment of the General Court of 27 November 2019 –Izuzquiza and Semsrott v Frontex (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to a naval operation carried out by Frontex in the central Mediterranean in 2017 — Vessels deployed — Refusal of access — Article 4(1)(a) of Regulation No 1049/2001 — Exception relating to the protection of the public interest in the field of public security)cjeu_case · 27 ноября 2019 г.
37063Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 27 novembre 2019.#Tedeschi Srl et Consorzio Stabile Istant Service contre C.M. Service Srl et Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Articles 49 et 56 TFUE – Passation des marchés publics – Directive 2004/18/CE – Article 25 – Sous-traitance – Réglementation nationale limitant la possibilité de sous-traiter à 30 % du montant total du marché public et interdisant que les prix applicables aux prestations sous-traitées soient réduits de plus de 20 % par rapport aux prix résultant de l’adjudication.#Affaire C-402/18.cjeu_case · 27 ноября 2019 г.
37064Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 November 2019.#Tedeschi Srl and Consorzio Stabile Istant Service v C.M. Service Srl and Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 49 and 56 TFEU – Public procurement – Directive 2004/18/EC – Article 25 – Subcontracting – National legislation limiting the possibility of subcontracting to 30% of the total value of the public contract and prohibiting prices for subcontracted works, supplies or services from being reduced by more than 20% compared to the prices stated in the decision awarding the contract.#Case C-402/18.cjeu_case · 27 ноября 2019 г.
37065Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 27 November 2019.#Wagram Invest SA v État belge.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Mons.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 78/660/EEC – Annual accounts of certain types of companies – Principle that a true and fair view must be given – Acquisition of a financial fixed asset by a public limited company – Entry as a charge in the profit and loss account of a discount relating to a non-interest-bearing debt due after one year and entry of the purchase price of the fixed asset as an asset in the balance sheet after deduction of the discount.#Case C-640/18.cjeu_case · 27 ноября 2019 г.
37066Case C-402/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Tedeschi Srl, acting on its own account and as agent of a temporary association of undertakings, Consorzio Stabile Istant Service, acting on its own account and as principal of a temporary association of undertakings v C.M. Service Srl, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 49 and 56 TFEU — Public procurement — Directive 2004/18/EC — Article 25 — Subcontracting — National legislation limiting the possibility of subcontracting to 30 % of the total amount of the contract and preventing the prices which apply to subcontracted services from being reduced by more than 20 % by comparison with the prices stipulated in the decision awarding the contract)cjeu_case · 27 ноября 2019 г.
37067Case T-290/19: Order of the General Court of 26 November 2019 — Stada Arzneimittel v EUIPO (Representation of two curved red lines arranged one above the other)cjeu_case · 26 ноября 2019 г.
37068Case C-871/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 26 November 2019 — Prefettura Ufficio territoriale del governo di Firenze v TBcjeu_case · 26 ноября 2019 г.
37069Case C-870/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 26 November 2019 — Prefettura Ufficio territoriale del governo di Firenze v MIcjeu_case · 26 ноября 2019 г.
37070Case C-864/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 26 November 2019 — NH v Deutsche Lufthansa AGcjeu_case · 26 ноября 2019 г.
37071Case C-863/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad Varna (Bulgaria) lodged on 26 November 2019 — Criminal proceedings against TScjeu_case · 26 ноября 2019 г.
37072Case C-862/19 P: Appeal brought on 26 November 2019 by the Czech Republic against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 12 September 2019 in Case T-629/17 Czech Republic v Commissioncjeu_case · 26 ноября 2019 г.
37073Case C-861/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social n.o 26 de Barcelona (Spain) lodged on 26 November 2019 — LJ v INSS (Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social)cjeu_case · 26 ноября 2019 г.
37074Case C-859/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție (Romania) lodged on 26 November 2019 — Criminal proceedings against FX, CS and NDcjeu_case · 26 ноября 2019 г.
37075Case C-857/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (Slovakia) lodged on 26 November 2019 — Slovak Telekom a.s. v Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republikycjeu_case · 26 ноября 2019 г.
37076Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 26 November 2019.#ZB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 6(1) – Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ – Criteria – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of executing a sentence.#Case C-627/19 PPU.cjeu_case · 26 ноября 2019 г.
37077Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 26 November 2019.#XD.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 6(1) – Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ – Criteria – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of criminal proceedings.#Case C-625/19 PPU.cjeu_case · 26 ноября 2019 г.
37078Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 26 November 2019.#JR and YC.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.#Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU.cjeu_case · 26 ноября 2019 г.
37079Case C-648/19: Order of the President of the Court of 26 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Erding — Germany) — EUflight.de GmbH v Eurowings GmbHcjeu_case · 26 ноября 2019 г.
37080Case C-541/19: Order of the President of the Court of 26 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — XW v Eurowings GmbHcjeu_case · 26 ноября 2019 г.