34121Case C-740/19: Order of the President of the Court of 26 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (formerly Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság) — Hungary) — NJ v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóságcjeu_case · 26 июня 2020 г.
34122Case C-210/19: Order of the President of the Court of 26 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (formerly Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság) — Hungary) — TN v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság, formerly Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatalcjeu_case · 26 июня 2020 г.
34123Case C-283/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail francophone de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 25 June 2020 — CO, ME, GC and 42 Others v MJ, European Commission, European External Action Service, Council of the European Union, Eulex Kosovocjeu_case · 25 июня 2020 г.
34124Case C-280/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 25 June 2020 — ZN v Generalno konsulstvo (General Consulate) of the Republic of Bulgaria in the City of Valencia, Kingdom of Spaincjeu_case · 25 июня 2020 г.
34125Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#Ministerio Fiscal v VL.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Asylum and immigration policy – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 6 – Access to the procedure – Application for international protection made to an authority competent under national law to register such applications – Application made to other authorities that are likely to receive such applications but are not, under national law, competent to register them – Definition of ‘other authorities’ – Article 26 – Detention – Standards for the reception of applicants for international protection – Directive 2013/33/EU – Article 8 – Detention of the applicant – Grounds for detention – Decision to hold an applicant in detention on account of a lack of capacity at humanitarian reception centres.#Case C-36/20 PPU.cjeu_case · 25 июня 2020 г.
34126Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#Ministerio Fiscal v VL.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Instrucción de San Bartolomé de Tirajana.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Asylum and immigration policy – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 6 – Access to the procedure – Application for international protection made to an authority competent under national law to register such applications – Application made to other authorities that are likely to receive such applications but are not, under national law, competent to register them – Definition of ‘other authorities’ – Article 26 – Detention – Standards for the reception of applicants for international protection – Directive 2013/33/EU – Article 8 – Detention of the applicant – Grounds for detention – Decision to hold an applicant in detention on account of a lack of capacity at humanitarian reception centres.#Case C-36/20 PPU.cjeu_case · 25 июня 2020 г.
34127Case C-36/20 PPU: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Instrucción No 3 de San Bartolomé de Tirajana — Spain) — proceedings concerning VL (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Asylum and immigration policy — Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 6 — Access to the procedure — Application for international protection made to an authority competent under national law to register such applications — Application made to other authorities that are likely to receive such applications but are not, under national law, competent to register them — Definition of ‘other authorities’ — Article 26 — Detention — Standards for the reception of applicants for international protection — Directive 2013/33/EU — Article 8 — Detention of the applicant — Grounds for detention — Decision to hold an applicant in detention on account of a lack of capacity at humanitarian reception centres)cjeu_case · 25 июня 2020 г.
34128Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#View, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Rectification.#Case T-49/19 REC.cjeu_case · 25 июня 2020 г.
34129Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#Roser Noguer Enríquez and Others v European Commission.#Actions for damages – Monetary Agreement between the European Union and the Principality of Andorra – Alleged negligence on the part of the Commission regarding the content of the Agreement – Alleged negligence on the part of the Commission in monitoring the implementation of the Agreement – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-22/19.cjeu_case · 25 июня 2020 г.
34130Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#Roser Noguer Enríquez and Others v European Commission.#Actions for damages – Monetary Agreement between the European Union and the Principality of Andorra – Alleged negligence on the part of the Commission regarding the content of the Agreement – Alleged negligence on the part of the Commission in monitoring the implementation of the Agreement – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-22/19.cjeu_case · 25 июня 2020 г.
34131Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#Brands Up OÜ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark Credit24 – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-651/19.cjeu_case · 25 июня 2020 г.
34132Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#Brands Up OÜ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark Credit24 – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-651/19.cjeu_case · 25 июня 2020 г.
34133Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#Malacalza Investimenti Srl v European Central Bank.#Access to documents — Decision of the ECB to place Banca Carige SpA under temporary administration — Refusal to grant access — Default procedure.#Case T-552/19.cjeu_case · 25 июня 2020 г.
34134Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#Malacalza Investimenti Srl v European Central Bank.#Access to documents — Decision of the ECB to place Banca Carige SpA under temporary administration — Refusal to grant access — Default procedure.#Case T-552/19.cjeu_case · 25 июня 2020 г.
34135Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#Nitto Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark NOSTER – Earlier EU word mark FOSTER – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-550/19.cjeu_case · 25 июня 2020 г.
34136Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#Nitto Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark NOSTER – Earlier EU word mark FOSTER – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-550/19.cjeu_case · 25 июня 2020 г.
34137Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#Serviceplan Gruppe für innovative Kommunikation GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark Serviceplan Solutions – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-380/19.cjeu_case · 25 июня 2020 г.
34138Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#Serviceplan Gruppe für innovative Kommunikation GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark Serviceplan Solutions – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-380/19.cjeu_case · 25 июня 2020 г.
34139Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#Serviceplan Gruppe für innovative Kommunikation GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark Serviceplan – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-379/19.cjeu_case · 25 июня 2020 г.
34140Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#Serviceplan Gruppe für innovative Kommunikation GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark Serviceplan – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-379/19.cjeu_case · 25 июня 2020 г.