Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
33304

Case T-144/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Kludi v EUIPO — Adlon Brand (ADLON) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark ADLON — Earlier EU word mark ADLON — Proof of the reputation of the earlier mark — Rule 19 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 7 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Temporal application of the law — Late submission of documents — Board of Appeal’s discretion — Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Relative ground for refusal — Damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark)

cjeu_case ·
33305

Case T-50/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Casual Dreams v EUIPO — López Fernández (Dayaday) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Dayaday — Earlier national figurative marks DAYADAY and dayaday — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Reputation — Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark)

cjeu_case ·
33309

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 9 septembre 2020.#JP contre Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique d’asile – Procédures communes pour l’octroi et le retrait de la protection internationale – Directive 2013/32/UE – Article 46 – Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Article 47 – Droit à un recours effectif – Recours contre une décision de rejet d’une demande ultérieure de protection internationale comme étant irrecevable – Délai de recours – Modalités de notification.#Affaire C-651/19.

cjeu_case ·
33310

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#JP v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 46 – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to an effective remedy – Action brought against a subsequent application for international protection as being inadmissible – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Rules governing notification.#Case C-651/19.

cjeu_case ·
33311

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 9 septembre 2020.#Friends of the Irish Environment Ltd contre An Bord Pleanála.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 92/43/CEE – Conservation des habitats naturels ainsi que de la faune et de la flore sauvages – Article 6, paragraphe 3 – Champ d’application – Notions de “projet” et d’“accord” – Évaluation appropriée des incidences d’un plan ou d’un projet sur un site protégé – Décision prolongeant la durée d’une autorisation de construire un terminal de regazéification de gaz naturel liquéfié – Décision initiale fondée sur une réglementation nationale n’ayant pas correctement transposé la directive 92/43.#Affaire C-254/19.

cjeu_case ·
33312

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Friends of the Irish Environment Ltd v An Bord Pleanála.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Irlande).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 92/43/EEC – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Article 6(3) – Scope – Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘agreement’ – Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project for a protected site – Decision extending the duration of a development consent for the construction of a liquefied natural gas regasification terminal – Original decision based on national legislation which did not properly transposed Directive 92/43.#Case C-254/19.

cjeu_case ·
33313

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 9 September 2020.#R.N.N.S. and K.A. v Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem.#References for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Community Code on Visas – Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 – Article 32(1) to (3) – Decision to refuse a visa – Annex VI – Standard form – Statement of reasons – Threat to public policy, internal security or public health, or to the international relations of any of the Member States – Article 22 – Procedure of prior consultation of central authorities of other Member States – Objection to the issuing of a visa – Appeal against a decision to refuse a visa – Scope of judicial review – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy.#Joined Cases C-225/19 and C-226/19.

cjeu_case ·
33314

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 9 September 2020.#Deutsche Telekom AG v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of dominant position – Slovak market for broadband internet access services – Regulatory obligation on the part of operators with significant market power to grant access to the local loop – Conditions laid down by the incumbent operator for unbundled access by other operators to the local loop – Indispensability of the access – Imputability of a subsidiary’s conduct to the parent company – Rights of the defence.#Case C-152/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
33315

Case C-651/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État — Belgium) — JP v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Asylum policy — Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 46 — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy — Action brought against a subsequent application for international protection as being inadmissible — Time limit for bringing proceedings — Rules governing notification)

cjeu_case ·
33316

Case C-254/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland) — Ireland) — Friends of the Irish Environment Ltd v An Bord Pleanála (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Article 6(3) — Scope — Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘agreement’ — Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project for a protected site — Decision extending the duration of a development consent for the construction of a liquefied natural gas regasification terminal — Original decision based on national legislation which did not properly transpose Directive 92/43)

cjeu_case ·
33317

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#P. Krücken Organic GmbH v European Commission.#Institutional law – Action for damages – Conditions in which the European Union incurs non-contractual liability – Arrangements for imports of organic products from third countries – Private inspection body – Concept of appropriate supervision within the meaning of Article 33(3) of Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 – Regulation (EC) No 1235/2008 – Attributability of conduct.#Case T-565/18.

cjeu_case ·
33318

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#P. Krücken Organic GmbH v European Commission.#Institutional law – Action for damages – Conditions in which the European Union incurs non-contractual liability – Arrangements for imports of organic products from third countries – Private inspection body – Concept of appropriate supervision within the meaning of Article 33(3) of Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 – Regulation (EC) No 1235/2008 – Attributability of conduct.#Case T-565/18.

cjeu_case ·
33319

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 September 2020.#BNP Paribas v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Contribution to the deposit guarantee scheme or the Single Resolution Fund through irrevocable payment commitments – Tasks conferred on the ECB – The ECB’s specific supervisory powers – Article 4(1)(f) and Article 16(1)(c) and (2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Measure imposing the deduction of the cumulative amount of outstanding irrevocable payment commitments from Common Equity Tier 1 capital – No individual examination.#Cases T-150/18 and T-345/18.

cjeu_case ·
33320

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 September 2020.#BNP Paribas v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Contribution to the deposit guarantee scheme or the Single Resolution Fund through irrevocable payment commitments – Tasks conferred on the ECB – The ECB’s specific supervisory powers – Article 4(1)(f) and Article 16(1)(c) and (2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Measure imposing the deduction of the cumulative amount of outstanding irrevocable payment commitments from Common Equity Tier 1 capital – No individual examination.#Cases T-150/18 and T-345/18.

cjeu_case ·