Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

33281

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Novomatic AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for European Union word mark PRIMUS – Earlier EU word mark PRIMUS – Earlier Benelux word mark PRIMUS – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-669/19.

cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.

33282

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Novomatic AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for European Union word mark PRIMUS – Earlier EU word mark PRIMUS – Earlier Benelux word mark PRIMUS – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-669/19.

cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.

33283

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Daw SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark SOS Loch- und Rissfüller – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-626/19.

cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.

33284

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Daw SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark SOS Loch- und Rissfüller – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-626/19.

cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.

33285

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Daw SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark SOS Innenfarbe – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-625/19.

cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.

33286

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Daw SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark SOS Innenfarbe – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-625/19.

cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.

33287

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Oliver Gothe and Martin Kunz v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark FAIR ZONE – Earlier EU word mark FAIR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-589/19.

cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.

33288

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Oliver Gothe and Martin Kunz v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark FAIR ZONE – Earlier EU word mark FAIR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-589/19.

cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.

33289

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Glaxo Group Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for an EU trade mark consisting of a shade of the colour purple – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Lack of distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-187/19.

cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.

33290

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Glaxo Group Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for an EU trade mark consisting of a shade of the colour purple – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Lack of distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-187/19.

cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.

33291

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Kludi GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark ADLON – Earlier EU word mark ADLON – Proof of the reputation of the earlier mark – Rule 19 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 7 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) – Temporal application of the law – Late submission of documents – Board of Appeal’s discretion – Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark.#Case T-144/19.

cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.

33292

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Kludi GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark ADLON – Earlier EU word mark ADLON – Proof of the reputation of the earlier mark – Rule 19 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 7 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) – Temporal application of the law – Late submission of documents – Board of Appeal’s discretion – Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark.#Case T-144/19.

cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.

33293

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Casual Dreams, SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Dayaday – Earlier national figurative marks DAYADAY and dayaday – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Reputation – Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark.#Case T-50/19.

cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.

33294

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Casual Dreams, SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Dayaday – Earlier national figurative marks DAYADAY and dayaday – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Reputation – Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark.#Case T-50/19.

cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.

33295

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Hellenic Republic v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from financing – Area-related aid scheme – Definition of ‘permanent grasslands’ – Article 4(1)(h) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Integrated administration and control system – Key controls – Regulation No 1306/2013 – Duty to state reasons.#Case T-46/19.

cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.

33296

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Hellenic Republic v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from financing – Area-related aid scheme – Definition of ‘permanent grasslands’ – Article 4(1)(h) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Integrated administration and control system – Key controls – Regulation No 1306/2013 – Duty to state reasons.#Case T-46/19.

cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.

33297

Case T-645/19: Order of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — IMG v Commission (Action for annulment — Development cooperation — Implementing the EU budget in indirect management — Execution of a judgment of the Court of Justice — Commission letter requesting that certain documents be provided — Act not open to challenge — Preparatory measure — Inadmissibility — Action for damages — Close link with the claim for annulment — Lis pendens — Inadmissibility — Failure to comply with procedural requirements — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure — Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.

33298

Case T-879/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Sumol + Compal Marcas v EUIPO — Jacob (Dr. Jacob’s essentials) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Dr. Jacob’s essentials — Earlier international word mark COMPAL ESSENCIAL — Earlier national and international figurative marks FRUTA essencial, COMPAL essencial and Compal FRUTA essencial — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.

33299

Case T-669/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Novomatic v EUIPO — Brouwerij Haacht (PRIMUS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for European Union word mark PRIMUS — Earlier EU word mark PRIMUS — Earlier Benelux word mark PRIMUS — Relative ground for refusal — Damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.

33300

Case T-626/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Daw v EUIPO (SOS Loch- und Rissfüller) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark SOS Loch- und Rissfüller — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.