Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
3262

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#Servoprax GmbH v Hauptzollamt Duisburg.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 – Tariff classification – Common Customs Tariff – Combined Nomenclature – Classification under subheading 9018 90 84 – Tourniquets – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 – Second sentence of Article 252 – Validity.#Case C-631/23.

cjeu_case ·
3263

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#JH v Policejní prezidium.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of their personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Article 4(1)(c) and (e) – Minimisation of data processing – Storage limitation of personal data – Article 10 – Collection and storage of biometric and genetic data – Strict necessity – Article 6(a) – Obligation to make a distinction between personal data of different categories of persons – National legislation which provides for the collection of biometric and genetic data of any person suspected or accused of having committed an intentional criminal offence – Article 5 – Appropriate time limits for erasure or for a periodic review of the need for the storage of those data – No maximum time limit for storage – Assessment of the need for the storage of biometric and genetic data by the police on the basis of internal rules – Article 8(2) – Lawfulness of the processing of those data – Concept of ‘Member State law’ – Whether national case-law may be classified as ‘Member State law’.#Case C-57/23.

cjeu_case ·
3264

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#JH v Policejní prezidium.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of their personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Article 4(1)(c) and (e) – Minimisation of data processing – Storage limitation of personal data – Article 10 – Collection and storage of biometric and genetic data – Strict necessity – Article 6(a) – Obligation to make a distinction between personal data of different categories of persons – National legislation which provides for the collection of biometric and genetic data of any person suspected or accused of having committed an intentional criminal offence – Article 5 – Appropriate time limits for erasure or for a periodic review of the need for the storage of those data – No maximum time limit for storage – Assessment of the need for the storage of biometric and genetic data by the police on the basis of internal rules – Article 8(2) – Lawfulness of the processing of those data – Concept of ‘Member State law’ – Whether national case-law may be classified as ‘Member State law’.#Case C-57/23.

cjeu_case ·
3265

Case C-631/23,Servoprax (Medical tourniquets): Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 November 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf – Germany) – Servoprax GmbH v Hauptzollamt Duisburg (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 – Tariff classification – Common Customs Tariff – Combined Nomenclature – Classification under subheading 90189084 – Tourniquets – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 – Second sentence of Article 252 – Validity)

cjeu_case ·
3266

Case C-57/23, Policejní prezidium (Storage of biometric and genetic data): Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 November 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud – Czech Republic) – JH v Policejní prezidium (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of their personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Article 4(1)(c) and (e) – Minimisation of data processing – Storage limitation of personal data – Article 10 – Collection and storage of biometric and genetic data – Strict necessity – Article 6(a) – Obligation to make a distinction between personal data of different categories of persons – National legislation which provides for the collection of biometric and genetic data of any person suspected or accused of having committed an intentional criminal offence – Article 5 – Appropriate time limits for erasure or for a periodic review of the need for the storage of those data – No maximum time limit for storage – Assessment of the need for the storage of biometric and genetic data by the police on the basis of internal rules – Article 8(2) – Lawfulness of the processing of those data – Concept of Member State law – Whether national case-law may be classified as Member State law)

cjeu_case ·
3270

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#HH v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of competition – Open competition EPSO/AD/400/22 – Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list – Equal treatment – Principle of good administration – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Stability of the composition of the selection board – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-23/25.

cjeu_case ·
3272

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#Zündapp Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing a stylised shield with horizontal bars – International registration of the earlier figurative mark representing two extended wings around a rectangle – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Similarity of the signs at issue.#Case T-3/25.

cjeu_case ·
3273

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#Zündapp Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing a stylised shield with horizontal bars – International registration of the earlier figurative mark representing two extended wings around a rectangle – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Similarity of the signs at issue.#Case T-3/25.

cjeu_case ·
3274

Case T-23/25: Judgment of the General Court of 19 November 2025 – HH v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of competition – Open competition EPSO/AD/400/22 – Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list – Equal treatment – Principle of good administration – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Stability of the composition of the selection board – Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
3275

Case T-3/25: Judgment of the General Court of 19 November 2025 – Zündapp v EUIPO – Longines (Representation of a stylised shield with horizontal bars) (EU trade mark–Opposition proceedings–Application for an EU figurative mark representing a stylised shield with horizontal bars–International registration of the earlier figurative mark representing two extended wings around a rectangle–Relative ground for refusal–No likelihood of confusion–Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001–Similarity of the signs at issue)

cjeu_case ·
3280

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#+pharma arzneimittel GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark PlusQuam +PHARMA – Earlier national word mark +PHARMA – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark through use – Reputation – Proof of use.#Case T-645/24.

cjeu_case ·