Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
32741

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 October 2020.#Eleanor Sharpston v Council of the European Union and Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States.#Action for annulment – Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union – Declaration by the Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States on the consequences of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union for the Advocates General of the Court of Justice – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility.#Case T-180/20.

cjeu_case ·
32742

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 October 2020.#Eleanor Sharpston v Council of the European Union and Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States.#Action for annulment – Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union – Declaration by the Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States on the consequences of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union for the Advocates General of the Court of Justice – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility.#Case T-180/20.

cjeu_case ·
32745

Case T-180/20: Order of the General Court of 6 October 2020 — Sharpston v Council and Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States (Action for annulment — Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union — Declaration by the Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States on the consequences of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union for the Advocates General of the Court of Justice — Act not open to challenge — Inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
32746

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 6 October 2020.#Bergslagernas Järnvaruaktiebolag v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Whether appeals may be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-284/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
32747

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 6 October 2020.#Bergslagernas Järnvaruaktiebolag v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Whether appeals may be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-284/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
32754

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 6 octobre 2020.#Vodafone España SAU contre Diputación Foral de Guipúzcoa.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Réseaux et services de communications électroniques – Directive 2002/20/CE – Article 13 – Redevance pour les droits d’utilisation des radiofréquences – Réglementation nationale sectorielle soumettant la réservation du domaine public radioélectrique à une taxe – Réglementation nationale soumettant la constitution de concessions administratives sur les biens du domaine public à un impôt sur les transmissions patrimoniales.#Affaire C-443/19.

cjeu_case ·
32755

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 October 2020.#Vodafone España SAU v Diputación Foral de Guipúzcoa.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia del País Vasco.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications networks and services – Directive 2002/20/EC – Article 13 – Fee for rights of use for radio frequencies – Sectoral national legislation subjecting the allocation of public radio frequencies to a charge – National legislation subjecting the grant of administrative concessions on public assets to a tax on the transfer of assets.#Case C-443/19.

cjeu_case ·
32756

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2020.#État luxembourgeois v B and Others.#References for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/16/EU – Administrative cooperation in the field of taxation – Articles 1 and 5 – Decision ordering that information be provided to the competent authority of a Member State, acting in response to a request for exchange of information from the competent authority of another Member State – Person holding the information the production of which is ordered by the competent authority of the first Member State – Taxpayer concerned by the investigation giving rise to the request from the competent authority of the second Member State – Third parties with whom that taxpayer maintains legal, banking, financial or, more broadly, economic relations – Judicial protection – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to an effective remedy – Article 52(1) – Limitation – Legal basis – Respect for the essence of the right to an effective remedy – Existence of a remedy enabling the individuals in question to obtain an effective review of all the relevant issues of fact and of law, as well as effective judicial protection of the rights guaranteed to them by EU law – Objective of general interest recognised by the Union – Combating international tax fraud and tax evasion – Proportionality – Whether the information referred to in the information order is ‘foreseeably relevant’ – Judicial review – Scope – Personal, temporal and material factors to be taken into consideration.#Joined Cases C-245/19 and C-246/19.

cjeu_case ·
32757

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2020.#État luxembourgeois v B and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative (Luxembourg).#References for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/16/EU – Administrative cooperation in the field of taxation – Articles 1 and 5 – Decision ordering that information be provided to the competent authority of a Member State, acting in response to a request for exchange of information from the competent authority of another Member State – Person holding the information the production of which is ordered by the competent authority of the first Member State – Taxpayer concerned by the investigation giving rise to the request from the competent authority of the second Member State – Third parties with whom that taxpayer maintains legal, banking, financial or, more broadly, economic relations – Judicial protection – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to an effective remedy – Article 52(1) – Limitation – Legal basis – Respect for the essence of the right to an effective remedy – Existence of a remedy enabling the individuals in question to obtain an effective review of all the relevant issues of fact and of law, as well as effective judicial protection of the rights guaranteed to them by EU law – Objective of general interest recognised by the Union – Combating international tax fraud and tax evasion – Proportionality – Whether the information referred to in the information order is ‘foreseeably relevant’ – Judicial review – Scope – Personal, temporal and material factors to be taken into consideration.#Joined Cases C-245/19 and C-246/19.

cjeu_case ·
32758

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2020.#Jobcenter Krefeld - Widerspruchsstelle v JD.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of persons – Workers – Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 – Article 7(2) – Equal treatment – Social advantages – Article 10 – Children attending school – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 24 – Social assistance – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 4 – Article 70 – Special non-contributory cash benefits – Migrant worker with dependent children attending school in the host Member State.#Case C-181/19.

cjeu_case ·
32759

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2020.#Jobcenter Krefeld - Widerspruchsstelle v JD.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of persons – Workers – Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 – Article 7(2) – Equal treatment – Social advantages – Article 10 – Children attending school – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 24 – Social assistance – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 4 – Article 70 – Special non-contributory cash benefits – Migrant worker with dependent children attending school in the host Member State.#Case C-181/19.

cjeu_case ·
32760

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2020.#Bank Refah Kargaran v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) – Article 29 TEU – Article 215 TFEU – Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran to prevent nuclear proliferation – Harm allegedly suffered by the appellant as a result of its name being included and maintained on the list of persons and entities covered by the freezing of financial funds and resources – Actions for damages – Jurisdiction of the CJEU to hear and determine an action for damages for the harm allegedly caused by restrictive measures taken in decisions adopted pursuant to the CFSP – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Inadequate statement of reasons for legal acts imposing restrictive measures.#Case C-134/19 P.

cjeu_case ·