Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

29801

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 28 April 2021.#West End Drinks Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark The King of SOHO – Earlier EU word mark SOHO – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-31/20.

cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2021 г.

29802

Case T-348/20: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Freistaat Bayern v EUIPO (GEWÜRZSOMMELIER) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark GEWÜRZSOMMELIER — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Neologism)

cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2021 г.

29803

Case T-311/20: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — France Agro v EUIPO — Chafay (Choumicha Saveurs) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark Choumicha Saveurs — Absolute ground for refusal — Bad faith — Declaration of invalidity — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2021 г.

29804

Case T-310/20: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Comercializadora Eloro v EUIPO — Zumex Group (JUMEX) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark JUMEX — Earlier EU figurative mark zumex — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2021 г.

29805

Case T-300/20: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Nosio v EUIPO — Tros del Beto (ACCUSÌ) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark ACCUSÌ — Earlier EU word mark ACÚSTIC — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2021 г.

29806

Case T-284/20: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Klaus Berthold v EUIPO — Thomann (HB Harley Benton) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark HB Harley Benton — Earlier EU word mark HB — Earlier national trade name — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and (4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2021 г.

29807

Case T-191/20: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — FCA Italy v EUIPO — Bettag (Pandem) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Pandem — Earlier national and international word marks PANDA — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2021 г.

29808

Case T-31/20: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — West End Drinks v EUIPO — Pernod Ricard (The King of SOHO) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark The King of SOHO — Earlier EU word mark SOHO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2021 г.

29809

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 April 2021.#Paula Correia v European Economic and Social Committee.#Civil service – EESC staff – Members of the temporary staff – Refusal to regrade – Action for annulment – Time limit for complaints – Burden of proving expiry of the time limit – Act adversely affecting an official – Admissibility – Equal treatment – Legal certainty – Action for damages – Non-material damage.#Case T-843/19.

cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2021 г.

29810

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 April 2021.#Paula Correia v European Economic and Social Committee.#Civil service – EESC staff – Members of the temporary staff – Refusal to regrade – Action for annulment – Time limit for complaints – Burden of proving expiry of the time limit – Act adversely affecting an official – Admissibility – Equal treatment – Legal certainty – Action for damages – Non-material damage.#Case T-843/19.

cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2021 г.

29811

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 April 2021.#Linde Material Handling GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark VertiLight – Earlier national word mark VERTI – Relative ground for refusal – No damage to reputation – No link between the marks at issue – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-644/19.

cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2021 г.

29812

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 April 2021.#Linde Material Handling GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark VertiLight – Earlier national word mark VERTI – Relative ground for refusal – No damage to reputation – No link between the marks at issue – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-644/19.

cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2021 г.

29813

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 April 2021.#Point Tec Products Electronic GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing two extended wings around a triangle – Earlier EU figurative mark representing two extended wings around a rectangle – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 72(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-615/19.

cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2021 г.

29814

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 April 2021.#Point Tec Products Electronic GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing two extended wings around a triangle – Earlier EU figurative mark representing two extended wings around a rectangle – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 72(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-615/19.

cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2021 г.

29815

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 April 2021.#Ammar Sharif v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against Syria – Freezing of funds – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Right to exercise an economic activity.#Case T-540/19.

cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2021 г.

29816

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 April 2021.#Ammar Sharif v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against Syria – Freezing of funds – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Right to exercise an economic activity.#Case T-540/19.

cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2021 г.

29817

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 April 2021.#Asolo LTD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark FLÜGEL – Earlier national word marks …VERLEIHT FLÜGEL and RED BULL VERLEIHT FLÜÜÜGEL – Relative grounds for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Right to be heard – Article 70(2) and Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-509/19.

cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2021 г.

29818

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 April 2021.#Asolo LTD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark FLÜGEL – Earlier national word marks …VERLEIHT FLÜGEL and RED BULL VERLEIHT FLÜÜÜGEL – Relative grounds for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Right to be heard – Article 70(2) and Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-509/19.

cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2021 г.

29819

Case T-843/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Correia v EESC (Civil service — EESC staff — Members of the temporary staff — Refusal to regrade — Action for annulment — Time limit for complaints — Burden of proving expiry of the time limit — Act adversely affecting an official — Admissibility — Equal treatment — Legal certainty — Action for damages — Non-material damage)

cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2021 г.

29820

Case T-644/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Linde Material Handling v EUIPO — Verti Aseguradora (VertiLight) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark VertiLight — Earlier national word mark VERTI — Relative ground for refusal — No damage to reputation — No link between the marks at issue — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2021 г.