29541Case C-302/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia n.° 4 de Castellón de la Plana (Spain) lodged on 12 May 2021 — Casilda v Banco Cetelem SAcjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.
29542Case C-300/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 12 May 2021 — UI v Österreichische Post AGcjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.
29543Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 May 2021.#Bavaria Weed GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU figurative mark BavariaWeed – Absolute ground for refusal – Trade mark contrary to public policy – Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 7(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-178/20.cjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.
29544Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 May 2021.#Bavaria Weed GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU figurative mark BavariaWeed – Absolute ground for refusal – Trade mark contrary to public policy – Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 7(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-178/20.cjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.
29545Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 May 2021.#Tornado Boats International ApS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Figurative EU mark TORNADO – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-167/20.cjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.
29546Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 May 2021.#Tornado Boats International ApS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Figurative EU mark TORNADO – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-167/20.cjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.
29547Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 12 May 2021.#Metamorfoza d.o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark MUSEUM OF ILLUSIONS – Earlier EU figurative mark MUSEUM OF ILLUSIONS – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 95 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-70/20.cjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.
29548Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 12 May 2021.#Metamorfoza d.o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark MUSEUM OF ILLUSIONS – Earlier EU figurative mark MUSEUM OF ILLUSIONS – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 95 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-70/20.cjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.
29549Case T-178/20: Judgment of the General Court of 12 May 2021 — Bavaria Weed v EUIPO (BavariaWeed) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark BavariaWeed — Absolute ground for refusal — Trade mark contrary to public policy — Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 7(2) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.
29550Case T-167/20: Judgment of the General Court of 12 May 2021 — Tornado Boats International v EUIPO — Haygreen (TORNADO) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Figurative EU mark TORNADO — Absolute ground for invalidity — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.
29551Case T-70/20: Judgment of the General Court of 12 May 2021 — Metamorfoza v EUIPO — Tiesios kreivės (MUSEUM OF ILLUSIONS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark MUSEUM OF ILLUSIONS — Earlier EU figurative mark MUSEUM OF ILLUSIONS — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 95 of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.
29552Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 12 mai 2021.#Claudio Necci contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Ancien agent contractuel – Sécurité sociale – Régime commun d’assurance maladie (RCAM) – Article 95 du régime applicable aux autres agents de l’Union européenne (RAA) – Maintien d’affiliation après retraite – Condition d’avoir été employé pendant plus de trois années – Demande d’affiliation au RCAM à la suite d’un transfert des droits à pension – Assimilation des annuités de pension bonifiées à des années de service ‐ Rejet de la demande – Recours en annulation – Acte faisant grief – Ordonnance du Tribunal constatant l’irrecevabilité du recours – Annulation.#Affaire C-202/20 P.cjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.
29553Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 May 2021.#Claudio Necci v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – Former member of the contract staff – Social security – Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme (JSIS) – Article 95 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (CEOS) – Continued membership after retirement – Condition of having been employed for more than three years – Request to join the JSIS following a transfer of pension rights – Equating the credited years of pensionable service with years of service ‐ Rejection of the request – Action for annulment – Act having an adverse effect – Order of the General Court declaring the action inadmissible – Order set aside.#Case C-202/20 P.cjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.
29554Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 12 mai 2021.#YJ contre Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Égalité de traitement entre hommes et femmes en matière de sécurité sociale – Directive 79/7/CEE – Article 4, paragraphe 1 – Discrimination fondée sur le sexe – Réglementation nationale prévoyant l’octroi d’un complément de pension pour maternité aux femmes ayant eu un certain nombre d’enfants – Exclusion du bénéfice de ce complément de pension des femmes ayant demandé un départ à la retraite anticipé – Champ d’application de la directive 79/7/CEE.#Affaire C-130/20.cjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.
29555Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 May 2021.#YJ v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social de Barcelona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security – Directive 79/7/EEC – Article 4(1) – Discrimination on ground of sex – National legislation providing for a pension maternity supplement to be granted to women who have had a certain number of children – Exclusion from entitlement to that pension supplement of women who have requested early retirement – Scope of Directive 79/7EEC.#Case C-130/20.cjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.
29556Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 12 mai 2021.#Hauptzollamt B contre XY.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des espèces de faune et de flore sauvages par le contrôle de leur commerce – Règlements (CE) nos 338/97 et 865/2006 – Caviar d’esturgeons – Introduction sur le territoire douanier de l’Union européenne à titre d’effets personnels ou domestiques – Permis d’importation – Dérogation – Limite de 125 grammes par personne – Dépassement – Intention d’en faire cadeau à autrui.#Affaire C-87/20.cjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.
29557Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 May 2021.#Hauptzollamt B v XY.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein – Regulations (EC) No 338/97 and (EC) No 865/2006 – Sturgeon caviar – Introduction into the customs territory of to the European Union for personal and household effects – Import permit – Derogation – Limit of 125 grams per person – Exceeded – Intention to give as a gift to a third party.#Case C-87/20.cjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.
29558Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 12 mai 2021.#YL contre Altenrhein Luftfahrt GmbH.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Transports aériens – Convention de Montréal – Article 17, paragraphe 1 – Responsabilité des transporteurs aériens en cas d’accident – Notion d’“accident” – Atterrissage dur s’inscrivant dans la plage de fonctionnement normale de l’aéronef – Lésion corporelle prétendument subie par un passager lors d’un tel atterrissage – Absence d’accident.#Affaire C-70/20.cjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.
29559Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 May 2021.#YL v Altenrhein Luftfahrt GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Montreal Convention – Article 17(1) – Air carrier liability in the event of accidents – Concept of ‘accident’ – Hard landing made within the normal operating range of an aircraft – Bodily injury allegedly sustained by a passenger during such a landing – No accident.#Case C-70/20.cjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.
29560Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 12 mai 2021.#PF et QG contre Caisse d’allocations familiales (CAF) d’Ille-et-Vilaine.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Libre circulation des travailleurs – Égalité de traitement – Avantages sociaux – Plafonds liés aux ressources – Prise en compte des ressources perçues l’avant-dernière année précédant la période de paiement d’allocations – Travailleur retournant dans son État membre d’origine – Réduction des droits aux allocations familiales.#Affaire C-27/20.cjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.