24721Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 March 2022.#Lea Nature Services v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark SO…? – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Lack of descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-196/21.cjeu_case · 9 марта 2022 г.
24722Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 March 2022.#Telefónica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark LOOP – Partial rejection of the application for registration – Absolute grounds of refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Objective characteristics inherent in the nature of the products and services – Sufficiently direct and specific relationship – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-132/21.cjeu_case · 9 марта 2022 г.
24723Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 March 2022.#Telefónica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark LOOP – Partial rejection of the application for registration – Absolute grounds of refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Objective characteristics inherent in the nature of the products and services – Sufficiently direct and specific relationship – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-132/21.cjeu_case · 9 марта 2022 г.
24724Case T-204/21: Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2022 — Stryker v EUIPO (RUGGED) (EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark RUGGED — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Competence of the Board of Appeal — Article 71 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 9 марта 2022 г.
24725Case T-197/21: Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2022 — Lea Nature Services v EUIPO — Debonair Trading Internacional (SO …?) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark SO …? — Absolute grounds for refusal — Distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Lack of descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 9 марта 2022 г.
24726Case T-196/21: Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2022 — Lea Nature Services v EUIPO — Debonair Trading Internacional (SO …?) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark SO …? — Absolute grounds for refusal — Distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Lack of descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 9 марта 2022 г.
24727Case T-132/21: Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2022 — Telefónica Germany v EUIPO (LOOP) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark LOOP — Partial rejection of the application for registration — Absolute grounds of refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Objective characteristics inherent in the nature of the products and services — Sufficiently direct and specific relationship — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 9 марта 2022 г.
24728Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 March 2022.#Nigar Kirimova v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment – Representation by a lawyer who is not an independent third party with regard to the applicant – Inadmissibility.#Case T-727/20.cjeu_case · 9 марта 2022 г.
24729Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 March 2022.#Nigar Kirimova v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment – Representation by a lawyer who is not an independent third party with regard to the applicant – Inadmissibility.#Case T-727/20.cjeu_case · 9 марта 2022 г.
24730Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 March 2022.#PrenzMarien GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark STONES – Declaration of revocation in part – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use in the European Union – Article 19(1) and Article 10(3) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-766/20.cjeu_case · 9 марта 2022 г.
24731Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 March 2022.#PrenzMarien GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark STONES – Declaration of revocation in part – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use in the European Union – Article 19(1) and Article 10(3) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-766/20.cjeu_case · 9 марта 2022 г.
24732Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 March 2022.#Alessandro Zardini v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of Open Competition EPSO/AD/371/19 – Decision of the Selection Board to exclude the applicant from the next phase of the competition – Criterion to assess professional experience – Compliance of criterion applied by the Selection Board with the competition notice.#Case T-511/20.cjeu_case · 9 марта 2022 г.
24733Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 March 2022.#Alessandro Zardini v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of Open Competition EPSO/AD/371/19 – Decision of the Selection Board to exclude the applicant from the next phase of the competition – Criterion to assess professional experience – Compliance of criterion applied by the Selection Board with the competition notice.#Case T-511/20.cjeu_case · 9 марта 2022 г.
24734Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 March 2022.#LD v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/371/19 – Decision of the Selection Board to exclude the applicant from the next phase of the competition – Criterion to assess professional experience – Compliance of criterion applied by the Selection Board with the competition notice.#Case T-474/20.cjeu_case · 9 марта 2022 г.
24735Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 March 2022.#LD v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/371/19 – Decision of the Selection Board to exclude the applicant from the next phase of the competition – Criterion to assess professional experience – Compliance of criterion applied by the Selection Board with the competition notice.#Case T-474/20.cjeu_case · 9 марта 2022 г.
24736Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 March 2022.#LA v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/371/19 – Decision of the Selection Board to exclude the applicant from the next phase of the competition – Criteria to assess professional experience – Compliance of criteria applied by the Selection Board with the competition notice.#Case T-456/20.cjeu_case · 9 марта 2022 г.
24737Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 March 2022.#LA v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/371/19 – Decision of the Selection Board to exclude the applicant from the next phase of the competition – Criteria to assess professional experience – Compliance of criteria applied by the Selection Board with the competition notice.#Case T-456/20.cjeu_case · 9 марта 2022 г.
24738Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 March 2022.#Italian Republic v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from financing – Area-related aid scheme – Financial corrections – Article 52(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 12(2) and (6) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 907/2014 – Definition of ‘permanent grasslands’ – Article 4(1)(h) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Producer organisation and operational programmes – Articles 26, 27, 31, 104 and 106 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 – Article 155 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 499/2014 – Public procurement procedure – Article 24(2)(c) and Article 26(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 65/2011 – Article 48(2) and Article 51(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 – Risk of financial loss.#Case T-10/20.cjeu_case · 9 марта 2022 г.
24739Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 March 2022.#Italian Republic v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from financing – Area-related aid scheme – Financial corrections – Article 52(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 12(2) and (6) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 907/2014 – Definition of ‘permanent grasslands’ – Article 4(1)(h) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Producer organisation and operational programmes – Articles 26, 27, 31, 104 and 106 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 – Article 155 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 499/2014 – Public procurement procedure – Article 24(2)(c) and Article 26(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 65/2011 – Article 48(2) and Article 51(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 – Risk of financial loss.#Case T-10/20.cjeu_case · 9 марта 2022 г.
24740Case T-727/20: Order of the General Court of 9 March 2022 — Kirimova v EUIPO (Action for annulment — Representation by a lawyer who is not an independent third party with regard to the applicant — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 9 марта 2022 г.