24701Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 10 March 2022.#Lux Express Estonia AS v Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tallinna Halduskohus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Imposition by means of general rules of an obligation to carry certain categories of passenger free of charge – Obligation for the competent authority to grant public service compensation to operators – Calculation method.#Case C-614/20.cjeu_case · 10 марта 2022 г.
24702Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 10 March 2022.#Proceedings brought by A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Recognition of professional qualifications – Directive 2005/36/EC – Article 2 – Scope – Article 13(2) – Regulated professions – Conditions for pursuing the profession of psychotherapist in a Member State on the basis of a diploma in psychotherapy issued by a university established in another Member State – Articles 45 and 49 TFEU – Freedom of movement and freedom of establishment – Assessment of the equivalence of the relevant training – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation between Member States – Conditions on the basis of which the host Member State may challenge the level of knowledge and qualifications attested to by a diploma issued in another Member State.#Case C-577/20.cjeu_case · 10 марта 2022 г.
24703Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 10 March 2022.#Finanzamt B v W AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of establishment – Articles 49 and 54 TFEU – Deduction of final losses incurred by a non-resident permanent establishment – State which has waived its power to impose taxes under a double taxation convention – Comparability of situations.#Case C-538/20.cjeu_case · 10 марта 2022 г.
24704Case C-519/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hannover — Germany) — Proceedings against K (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Immigration policy — Directive 2008/115/EC — Detention for the purpose of removal — Article 16(1) — Direct effect — Specialised detention facility — Concept — Detention in prison accommodation — Conditions — Article 18 — Emergency situation — Concept — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Effective judicial review)cjeu_case · 10 марта 2022 г.
24705Case C-498/20: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Midden-Nederland — Netherlands) — ZK, in his capacity as successor to JM, liquidator in the bankruptcy of BMA Nederland BV v BMA Braunschweigische Maschinenbauanstalt AG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Point 2 of Article 7 — Jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict — Claim made by a liquidator against a third party for the benefit of the creditors — Place where the damage occurred — Point 2 of Article 8 — Application for leave to intervene by a protector of collective interests — Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 — Scope — General rule)cjeu_case · 10 марта 2022 г.
24706Case C-247/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Social Security Appeal Tribunal (Northern Ireland) — United Kingdom) — VI v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States — Article 21 TFEU — Directive 2004/38/EC — Article 7(1)(b) and Article 16 — Child who is a national of a Member State staying in another Member State — Right of residence derived from the parent who is the primary carer of that child — Requirement of comprehensive sickness insurance cover — Child having a permanent right of residence for part of the periods concerned)cjeu_case · 10 марта 2022 г.
24707Case C-177/20: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Győri Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — ‘Grossmania’ Mezőgazdasági Termelő és Szolgáltató Kft. v Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Principles of EU law — Primacy — Direct effect — Sincere cooperation — Article 4(3) TEU — Article 63 TFEU — Obligations of a Member State as a result of a preliminary ruling — Interpretation of a provision of EU law given by the Court in a preliminary ruling — Obligation to give full effect to EU law — Obligation for a national court to disapply national legislation which contravenes EU law as interpreted by the Court — Administrative decision which became final in the absence of a challenge before the courts — Principles of equivalence and effectiveness — Liability of the Member State)cjeu_case · 10 марта 2022 г.
24708Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 March 2022.#European Commission v Freistaat Bayern and Others.#Appeal – State aid – Aid in favour of the German dairy sector – Financing of milk quality tests – Article 108(2) TFEU – Decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure – Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 – Article 6(1) – Obligation for the European Commission to summarise the relevant issues of fact and law in that decision – Scope – Rights of interested parties to be involved in the administrative procedure – Breach of an essential procedural requirement – Consequences for the lawfulness of the final decision.#Joined Cases C-167/19 P and C-171/19 P.cjeu_case · 10 марта 2022 г.
24709Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 March 2022.#European Commission v Freistaat Bayern and Others.#Appeal – State aid – Aid in favour of the German dairy sector – Financing of milk quality tests – Article 108(2) TFEU – Decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure – Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 – Article 6(1) – Obligation for the European Commission to summarise the relevant issues of fact and law in that decision – Scope – Rights of interested parties to be involved in the administrative procedure – Breach of an essential procedural requirement – Consequences for the lawfulness of the final decision.#Joined Cases C-167/19 P and C-171/19 P.cjeu_case · 10 марта 2022 г.
24710Joined Cases C-167/19 P and C-171/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 March 2022 — European Commission v Freistaat Bayern and Others (Appeal — State aid — Aid in favour of the German dairy sector — Financing of milk quality tests — Article 108(2) TFUE — Decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure — Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 — Article 6(1) — Obligation for the European Commission to summarise the relevant issues of fact and law in that decision — Scope — Rights of interested parties to be involved in the administrative procedure — Breach of an essential procedural requirement — Consequences for the lawfulness of the final decision)cjeu_case · 10 марта 2022 г.
24711Rectification order of 10 March 2022.#Intel Corporation Inc. v European Commission.#Rectification.#Case T-286/09 RENV.cjeu_case · 10 марта 2022 г.
24713Case C-186/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 9 March 2022 — Sad Trasporto Locale SpA v Provincia autonoma di Bolzanocjeu_case · 9 марта 2022 г.
24714Case C-181/22 P: Appeal brought on 9 March 2022 by Nemea Bank plc against the order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 20 December 2021 in Case T-321/17, Niemelä and Others v ECBcjeu_case · 9 марта 2022 г.
24715Case C-180/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 9 March 2022 — Finanzamt Hamm v Harry Mensingcjeu_case · 9 марта 2022 г.
24716Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 March 2022.#Stryker Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark RUGGED – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Competence of the Board of Appeal – Article 71 of Regulation 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-204/21.cjeu_case · 9 марта 2022 г.
24717Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 March 2022.#Stryker Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark RUGGED – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Competence of the Board of Appeal – Article 71 of Regulation 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-204/21.cjeu_case · 9 марта 2022 г.
24718Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 March 2022.#Lea Nature Services v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark SO …? – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-197/21.cjeu_case · 9 марта 2022 г.
24719Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 March 2022.#Lea Nature Services v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark SO…? – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-197/21.cjeu_case · 9 марта 2022 г.
24720Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 March 2022.#Lea Nature Services v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark SO …? – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Lack of descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-196/21.cjeu_case · 9 марта 2022 г.