Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
24321

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 31 March 2022.#DM v CTS Eventim AG & Co. KGaA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Bremen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2011/83/EU – Right of withdrawal for distance and off-premises contracts – Exceptions to the right of withdrawal – Article 16(l) – Provision of services related to leisure activities – Contract providing for a specific date or period of performance – Provision of ticket agency services – Intermediary acting in its name but on behalf of the organiser of a leisure activity – Risk associated with the exercise of the right of withdrawal.#Case C-96/21.

cjeu_case ·
24322

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 31 March 2022.#Port de Bruxelles and Région de Bruxelles-Capitale v Infrabel SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trans-European transport network – Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 – Article 15(1) – Inland waterways transport infrastructure – Inland ports – Obligation of a Member State to connect inland ports with road or rail transport infrastructure – Removal of the connection with one of those two types of transport infrastructure – Conditions.#Case C-229/21.

cjeu_case ·
24323

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 31 March 2022.#KL.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 2(4) – Condition of double criminality of the act – Article 4(1) – Ground for optional non-execution of the European arrest warrant – Verification by the executing judicial authority – Acts some of which constitute an offence under the law of the executing Member State – Article 49(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of proportionality of criminal offences and penalties.#Case C-168/21.

cjeu_case ·
24324

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 31 March 2022.#Digi Távközlési és Szolgáltató Kft. v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5(1)(b) and (e) – Principle of ‘purpose limitation’ – Principle of ‘storage limitation’ – Creation, from an existing database, of a database to carry out tests and correct errors – Further processing of the data – Compatibility of the further processing of those data with the purposes of the initial collection – Retention period in the light of those purposes.#Case C-77/21.

cjeu_case ·
24325

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 31 March 2022.#Banka Slovenije.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Upravno sodišče Republike Slovenije.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – European System of Central Banks – National Central Bank – Directive 2001/24/EC – Reorganisation and winding up of credit institutions – Compensation for damage resulting from the adoption of reorganisation measures – Article 123 TFEU and Article 21.1 of Protocol (No 4) on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank – Prohibition of monetary financing of Member States in the euro area – Article 130 TFEU and Article 7 of that protocol – Independence – Disclosure of confidential information.#Case C-45/21.

cjeu_case ·
24326

Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 31 March 2022.#Uniqa Versicherungen AG v VU.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – European order for payment procedure – Regulation No 1896/2006 – Article 16(2) – 30-day time limit for lodging a statement of opposition to the European order for payment – Article 20 – Review procedure – Article 26 – Application of national law for procedural issues not specifically dealt with in that regulation – COVID-19 pandemic – National legislation which interrupted the procedural periods in civil matters for several weeks.#Case C-18/21.

cjeu_case ·
24328

Case C-231/21: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 31 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — IA v Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Dublin system — Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 — Article 29(2) — Transfer of the asylum seeker to the Member State responsible for examining the application for international protection — Six-month time limit for transfer — Possibility of extending that time limit up to a maximum of one year in the event of imprisonment — Definition of ‘imprisonment’ — Court-authorised non-voluntary committal of the asylum seeker to a hospital psychiatric department)

cjeu_case ·
24329

Case C-195/21: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 31 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Lukovit — Bulgaria) — LB v Smetna palata na Republika Bulgaria (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Applicability to a purely internal situation — Article 58(1) and (4) — Selection criteria — Technical and professional ability of the tenderers — Protection of the financial interests of the European Union — Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 — Article 8(3) — Control measures — Possibility for national authorities protecting the financial interests of the European Union to assess differently a public procurement procedure)

cjeu_case ·
24330

Case C-96/21: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 31 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Bremen — Germany) — DM v CTS Eventim AG & Co. KGaA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2011/83/EU — Right of withdrawal for distance and off-premises contracts — Exceptions to the right of withdrawal — Article 16(l) — Provision of services related to leisure activities — Contract providing for a specific date or period of performance — Provision of ticket agency services — Intermediary acting in its name but on behalf of the organiser of a leisure activity — Risk associated with the exercise of the right of withdrawal)

cjeu_case ·
24331

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 31 March 2022.#European Commission v Portuguese Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Environment – Directive 2002/49/EC – Assessment and management of environmental noise – Agglomerations, major roads and major railways – Article 7(2) – Strategic noise maps – Article 8(2) – Action plans – Article 10(2) – Annex VI – Information provided by the strategic noise maps – Summaries of action plans – Failure to communicate to the European Commission within the periods prescribed.#Case C-687/20.

cjeu_case ·
24332

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 31 March 2022.#European Commission v Portuguese Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Environment – Directive 2002/49/EC – Assessment and management of environmental noise – Agglomerations, major roads and major railways – Article 7(2) – Strategic noise maps – Article 8(2) – Action plans – Article 10(2) – Annex VI – Information provided by the strategic noise maps – Summaries of action plans – Failure to communicate to the European Commission within the periods prescribed.#Case C-687/20.

cjeu_case ·
24333

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 31 March 2022.#Lombard Pénzügyi és Lízing Zrt. v PN.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms – Credit agreements – Loan denominated in a foreign currency repayable in national currency – Contractual term placing the exchange rate risk on the consumer – Unfairness of a term relating to the main subject matter of the agreement – Effects – Invalidity of the agreement – Serious harm to the consumer – Effectiveness of Directive 93/13 – Non-binding opinion of the highest court – Possibility of restoring the parties to the situation they would have been in if that agreement had not been concluded.#Case C-472/20.

cjeu_case ·
24334

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 31 March 2022.#Lombard Pénzügyi és Lízing Zrt. v PN.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms – Credit agreements – Loan denominated in a foreign currency repayable in national currency – Contractual term placing the exchange rate risk on the consumer – Unfairness of a term relating to the main subject matter of the agreement – Effects – Invalidity of the agreement – Serious harm to the consumer – Effectiveness of Directive 93/13 – Non-binding opinion of the highest court – Possibility of restoring the parties to the situation they would have been in if that agreement had not been concluded.#Case C-472/20.

cjeu_case ·
24335

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 31 mars 2022.#Commission européenne contre République de Pologne.#Manquement d’État – Taxation des produits énergétiques utilisés par les entreprises grandes consommatrices d’énergie – Directive 2003/96/CE – Article 17, paragraphe 1, sous b), et paragraphe 4 – Entreprises relevant du système d’échange de quotas d’émission de l’Union européenne – Exonération du droit d’accise.#Affaire C-139/20.

cjeu_case ·
24337

Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 31 March 2022.#INVEST FUND MANAGEMENT v Komisia za finansov nadzor.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 2009/65/EC – Undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) – UCITS management companies – Obligations concerning information to be provided to investors – Article 72 – Obligation to update the ‘essential elements of the prospectus’ – Scope – Article 69(2) – Information referred to in Schedule A of Annex I – Composition of a body of the management company – Article 99a(r) – Transposition into national law – National legislation extending the situations in which an infringement relating to the updating of the prospectus may be established and penalised.#Case C-473/20.

cjeu_case ·
24338

Case C-687/20: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 31 March 2022 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Environment — Directive 2002/49/EC — Assessment and management of environmental noise — Agglomerations, major roads and major railways — Article 7(2) — Strategic noise maps — Article 8(2) — Action plans — Article 10(2) — Annex VI — Information provided by the strategic noise maps — Summaries of action plans — Failure to communicate to the European Commission within the periods prescribed)

cjeu_case ·
24339

Case C-472/20: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 31 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Lombard Pénzügyi és Lízing Zrt. v PN (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms — Loan contracts — Loan denominated in a foreign currency and repayable in the national currency — Contractual term placing the foreign exchange risk on the consumer — Unfairness of a term relating to the main subject matter of the contract — Effects — Invalidity of the contract — Serious damage to the consumer — Effectiveness of Directive 93/13 — Non-binding opinion of the supreme court — Possibility of restoring the parties to the situation they would have been in if that contract had not been concluded)

cjeu_case ·