Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161316) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43188) directive (8067)
316 885 документов
9803

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 June 2025.#Nidec Asi SpA and Ceisis SpA Sistemi Impiantistici Integrati v Ministero per gli Affari europei, Politiche di coesione e Piano nazionale di ripresa e resilienza and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Public procurement – Directive 2014/25/EU – Articles 39, 70 and 75 – Right of access to a technical tender in its entirety – Protection of the confidentiality of information submitted to a contracting entity by an economic operator – Protection of trade secrets – Effective judicial protection.#Case C-686/24.

cjeu_case ·
9804

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 June 2025.#Nidec Asi SpA and Ceisis SpA Sistemi Impiantistici Integrati v Ministero per gli Affari europei, Politiche di coesione e Piano nazionale di ripresa e resilienza and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Public procurement – Directive 2014/25/EU – Articles 39, 70 and 75 – Right of access to a technical tender in its entirety – Protection of the confidentiality of information submitted to a contracting entity by an economic operator – Protection of trade secrets – Effective judicial protection.#Case C-686/24.

cjeu_case ·
9805

Case C-686/24, Nidec Asi and Ceisis: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 June 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato – Italy) – Nidec Asi SpA, Ceisis SpA Sistemi Impiantistici Integrati v Ministero per gli Affari europei and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Public procurement – Directive 2014/25/EU – Articles 39, 70 and 75 – Right of access to a technical tender in its entirety – Protection of the confidentiality of information submitted to a contracting entity by an economic operator – Protection of trade secrets – Effective judicial protection)

cjeu_case ·
9806

Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 June 2025.#Landesbank Baden-Württemberg v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2019 ex ante contributions – Obligation to state reasons – Effective judicial protection – Equal treatment – Principle of proportionality – Margin of discretion of the SRB – Plea of illegality – Margin of discretion of the Commission – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-480/19.

cjeu_case ·
9807

Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 June 2025.#Landesbank Baden-Württemberg v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2019 ex ante contributions – Obligation to state reasons – Effective judicial protection – Equal treatment – Principle of proportionality – Margin of discretion of the SRB – Plea of illegality – Margin of discretion of the Commission – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-480/19.

cjeu_case ·
9808

Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 June 2025.#Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2019 ex ante contributions – Determination of the annual target level – Cap provided for in the first and fourth subparagraphs of Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Principle of legal certainty – Right to effective judicial protection – Plea of illegality – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-479/19.

cjeu_case ·
9809

Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 June 2025.#Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2019 ex ante contributions – Determination of the annual target level – Cap provided for in the first and fourth subparagraphs of Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Principle of legal certainty – Right to effective judicial protection – Plea of illegality – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-479/19.

cjeu_case ·
9810

Case T-480/19: Order of the General Court of 10 June 2025 – Landesbank Baden-Württemberg v SRB (2019 ex ante contributions) (Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2019 ex ante contributions – Obligation to state reasons – Effective judicial protection – Equal treatment – Principle of proportionality – Margin of discretion of the SRB – Plea of illegality – Margin of discretion of the Commission – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case ·
9811

Case T-479/19: Order of the General Court of 10 June 2025 – Hypo Vorarlberg Bank v SRB (2019 ex ante contributions) (Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2019 ex ante contributions – Determination of the annual target level – Cap provided for in the first and fourth subparagraphs of Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Principle of legal certainty – Right to effective judicial protection – Plea of illegality – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case ·
9812

Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 June 2025.#Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism of credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2018 ex ante contributions – Determination of the annual target level – Ceiling laid down in first and fourth paragraphs of Article 70(2)of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Principle of legal certainty – Right to effective judicial protection – Plea of illegality – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-414/18.

cjeu_case ·
9813

Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 June 2025.#Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism of credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2018 ex ante contributions – Determination of the annual target level – Ceiling laid down in first and fourth paragraphs of Article 70(2)of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Principle of legal certainty – Right to effective judicial protection – Plea of illegality – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-414/18.

cjeu_case ·
9814

Case T-414/18: Order of the General Court of 10 June 2025 – Hypo Vorarlberg Bank v SRB (2018 ex ante contributions) (Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism of credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2018 ex ante contributions – Determination of the annual target level – Ceiling laid down in first and fourth paragraphs of Article 70(2)of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Principle of legal certainty – Right to effective judicial protection – Plea of illegality – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case ·