Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161354) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43245) directive (8067)
316 981 документ
53241

Case C-32/20: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte di appello di Napoli — Italy) — TJ v Balga Srl (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Article 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Protection in the event of unjustified dismissal — Articles 20, 21, 34 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Directive 98/59/EC — Collective dismissal — National legislation on the protection to be afforded to a worker who has been the subject of unjustified collective dismissal on account of a violation of the criteria for selecting the workers to be dismissed — Absence of a situation regarding the implementation of EU law within the meaning of Article 51(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Inapplicability of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Manifest lack of jurisdiction)

cjeu_case ·
53244

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 June 2020.#Criminal proceedings against FU.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Regulation (EU) 2016/399 – Schengen borders code – Articles 22 and 23 – Abolition of internal border controls in the Schengen area – Checks within the territory of a Member State – Measures having an effect equivalent to border checks – Identity checks in the vicinity of an internal border of the Schengen area – Possibilities of checks irrespective of the behaviour of the person concerned or of the existence of specific circumstances – National framework concerning the intensity, frequency and selectivity of the checks.#Case C-554/19.

cjeu_case ·
53245

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 June 2020.#Criminal proceedings against FU.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Kehl.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Regulation (EU) 2016/399 – Schengen borders code – Articles 22 and 23 – Abolition of internal border controls in the Schengen area – Checks within the territory of a Member State – Measures having an effect equivalent to border checks – Identity checks in the vicinity of an internal border of the Schengen area – Possibilities of checks irrespective of the behaviour of the person concerned or of the existence of specific circumstances – National framework concerning the intensity, frequency and selectivity of the checks.#Case C-554/19.

cjeu_case ·
53248

Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 4 juin 2020.#SC C.F. SRL contre A.J.F.P.M. et D.G.R.F.P.C.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Principes du droit de l’Union – Respect des droits de la défense – Procédure fiscale – Exercice du droit à déduction en matière de taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Refus du droit à déduction en raison du comportement prétendument inadéquat des fournisseurs de l’assujetti – Acte administratif émis par les autorités fiscales nationales sans donner au contribuable concerné l’accès aux informations et aux documents servant de fondement audit acte – Suspicion de fraude fiscale – Pratique nationale subordonnant l’exercice du droit à déduction à la détention de documents justificatifs autres que la facture fiscale – Admissibilité.#Affaire C-430/19.

cjeu_case ·
53249

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 June 2020.#SC C.F. SRL v A.J.F.P.M. and D.G.R.F.P.C.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Cluj.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Principles of EU law — Observance of the rights of the defence — Tax procedure — Exercise of the right to deduct with regard to value added tax (VAT) — Refusal of the right to deduct on account of the allegedly improper conduct of the taxable person’s suppliers — Administrative act issued by the national tax authorities without giving the taxpayer access to the information and the documents on which the act was based — Suspicion of tax evasion — National practice pursuant to which exercise of the right to deduct is subject to the possession of supporting documents other than the tax invoice — Whether permissible.#Case C-430/19.

cjeu_case ·
53252

Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 4 juin 2020.#Boudewijn Schokker contre Agence européenne de la sécurité aérienne (AESA).#Pourvoi – Fonction publique Agents contractuels Procédure de recrutement Classement en grade Régime applicable aux autres agents Article 86 Agence européenne de la sécurité aérienne (AESA) Dispositions générales d’exécution Contestation du classement proposé Retrait de l’offre d’emploi Recours en indemnité Principe de bonne administration Devoir de sollicitude Faute de service Responsabilité non contractuelle de l’Union Préjudice moral Réparation.#Affaire C-310/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
53253

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2020.#Boudewijn Schokker v European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA).#Appeal – Civil service – Contract staff – Recruitment procedure – Classification in grade – Conditions of Employment of Other Servants – Article 86 – European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) – General implementing provisions – Challenge of the proposed classification – Withdrawal of the offer of employment – Action for compensation – Principle of sound administration – Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff – Breach of administrative duty – Non-contractual liability of the European Union – Non-material damage – Compensation.#Case C-310/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
53254

Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 4 juin 2020.#Service européen pour l'action extérieure (SEAE) contre Stéphane De Loecker.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Service européen pour l’action extérieure (SEAE) – Agent temporaire – Harcèlement moral – Demande d’assistance – Rejet de la demande – Recours en annulation et en indemnité – Article 41 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Droit d’être entendu – Article 266 TFUE – Exécution de l’arrêt d’annulation.#Affaire C-187/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
53255

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 June 2020.#European External Action Service (EEAS) v Stéphane De Loecker.#Appeal – Civil service – European External Action Service (EEAS) – Member of the temporary staff – Psychological harassment – Request for assistance – Rejection of the request – Action for annulment and damages – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to be heard – Article 266 TFEU – Compliance with the annulling judgment.#Case C-187/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
53256

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 4 juin 2020.#FX contre GZ.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Compétence, reconnaissance et exécution des décisions en matière d’obligations alimentaires – Règlement (CE) no 4/2009 – Article 41, paragraphe 1 – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Règlement (UE) no 1215/2012 – Article 24, paragraphe 5 – Titre déclaré exécutoire, constatant une créance alimentaire – Action en opposition à exécution – Compétence de la juridiction de l’État membre d’exécution.#Affaire C-41/19.

cjeu_case ·
53257

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 June 2020.#FX v GZ.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Köln.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters relating to maintenance obligations — Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 — Article 41(1) — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Article 24(5) — Maintenance order declared enforceable — Application opposing enforcement — Jurisdiction of the court of the Member State of enforcement.#Case C-41/19.

cjeu_case ·
53258

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 4 juin 2020.#Asmel societá consortile a r.l. contre Autorità Nazionale Anticorruzione (ANAC).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Marchés publics – Directive 2004/18/CE – Centrales d’achat – Petites communes – Limitation à seulement deux modèles organisationnels pour les centrales d’achat – Interdiction de faire appel à une centrale d’achat de droit privé et avec la participation d’entités privées – Limitation territoriale de l’activité des centrales d’achat.#Affaire C-3/19.

cjeu_case ·
53259

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 June 2020.#Asmel societá consortile a r.l. v A.N.A.C. - Autorità Nazionale Anticorruzione.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2004/18/EC – Central purchasing bodies – Small municipalities – Restriction to only two organisational models for central purchasing bodies – Prohibition on using a central purchasing body governed by private law and involving the participation of private entities – Territorial restrictions on the activities of central purchasing bodies.#Case C-3/19.

cjeu_case ·
53260

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 4 June 2020.#Union des industries de la protection des plantes v Premier ministre and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Placing of plant protection products on the market – Emergency measures – Officially informing the European Commission – Directive (EU) 2015/1535 – Procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations – Neonicotinoids – Protection of bees – Principle of sincere cooperation.#Case C-514/19.

cjeu_case ·