Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161354) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43245) directive (8067)
316 981 документ
49861

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 11 novembre 2020.#DenizBank AG contre Verein für Konsumenteninformation.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Directive (UE) 2015/2366 – Services de paiement dans le marché intérieur – Article 4, point 14 – Notion d’instrument de paiement – Cartes bancaires multifonctions personnalisées – Fonction de communication en champ proche (NFC) – Article 52, point 6, sous a), et article 54, paragraphe 1 – Informations à fournir à l’utilisateur – Modification des conditions d’un contrat-cadre – Acceptation tacite – Article 63, paragraphe 1, sous a) et b) – Droits et obligations liés aux services de paiement – Dérogation pour les instruments de paiement relatifs à des montants de faible valeur – Conditions d’application – Instrument de paiement ne pouvant pas être bloqué – Instrument de paiement utilisé de manière anonyme – Limitation des effets de l’arrêt dans le temps.#Affaire C-287/19.

cjeu_case ·
49862

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 November 2020.#DenizBank AG v Verein für Konsumenteninformation.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive (EU) 2015/2366 – Payment services in the internal market – Article 4(14) – Concept of ‘payment instrument’ – Personalised multifunctional bank cards – Near-field communication (NFC) functionality – Article 52(6)(a) and Article 54(1) – Information to be provided to users – Change in the conditions of a framework contract – Tacit consent – Article 63(1)(a) and (b) – Rights and obligations related to payment services – Derogation for low-value payment instruments – Conditions under which applicable – Payment instrument that does not allow its blocking – Payment instrument used anonymously – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment.#Case C-287/19.

cjeu_case ·
49863

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 11 novembre 2020.#Orange Romania SA contre Autoritatea Naţională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 95/46/CE – Article 2, sous h), et article 7, sous a) – Règlement (UE) 2016/679 – Article 4, point 11, et article 6, paragraphe 1, sous a) – Traitement des données à caractère personnel et protection de la vie privée Collecte et conservation des copies de titres d’identité par un fournisseur de services de télécommunications mobiles Notion de “consentement” de la personne concernée – Manifestation de volonté libre, spécifique et informée – Déclaration de consentement au moyen d’une case à cocher Signature du contrat par la personne concernée – Charge de la preuve.#Affaire C-61/19.

cjeu_case ·
49864

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 November 2020.#Orange Romania SA v Autoritatea Naţională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 95/46/EC – Article 2(h) and Article 7(a) – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 4(11) and Article 6(1)(a) – Processing of personal data and protection of private life 20220737 – Collection and storage of the copies of identity documents by a provider of mobile telecommunications services – Concept of the data subject’s ‘consent’ – Freely given, specific and informed indication of wishes – Declaration of consent by means of a tick box – Signing of the contract by the data subject – Burden of proof.#Case C-61/19.

cjeu_case ·
49865

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 11 November 2020.#Academia de Studii Economice din Bucureşti v Organismul Intermediar pentru Programul Operaţional Capital Uman - Ministerul Educaţiei Naţionale.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti.#References for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Organisation of working time – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 2 – Definition of ‘working time’ – Article 3 – Minimum period of daily rest – Workers having concluded several employment contracts with the same employer – Application by worker.#Case C-585/19.

cjeu_case ·
49866

Case C-433/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Ellmes Property Services Limited v SP (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Article 24, point 1 — Exclusive jurisdiction in matters relating to rights in rem in immovable property — Article 7, point 1(a) — Special jurisdiction in matters relating to a contract — Legal action brought by a co-owner seeking an order that another co-owner cease the use, for touristic purposes, of immovable property subject to co-ownership)

cjeu_case ·
49867

Case C-300/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social No 3 de Barcelona — Spain) — UQ v Marclean Technologies SLU (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Collective redundancies — Directive 98/59/EC — First subparagraph of Article 1(1)(a) — Definition of ‘collective redundancies’ — Methods of calculating the number of redundancies — Reference period take into account)

cjeu_case ·
49868

Case C-287/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — DenizBank AG v Verein für Konsumenteninformation (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive (EU) 2015/2366 — Payment services in the internal market — Article 4(14) — Concept of ‘payment instrument’ — Personalised multifunctional bank cards — Near-field communication (NFC) functionality — Article 52(6)(a) and Article 54(1) — Information to be provided to users — Change in the conditions of a framework contract — Tacit consent — Article 63(1)(a) and (b) — Rights and obligations related to payment services — Derogation for low-value payment instruments — Conditions under which applicable — Payment instrument that does not allow its blocking — Payment instrument used anonymously — Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment)

cjeu_case ·
49869

Case C-61/19: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti — Romania) — Orange România SA v Autoritatea Națională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 95/46/EC — Article 2(h) and Article 7(a) — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Article 4(11) and Article 6(1)(a) — Processing of personal data and protection of private life — Collection and storage of the copies of identity documents by a provider of mobile telecommunications services — Concept of the data subject’s ‘consent’ — Freely given, specific and informed indication of wishes — Declaration of consent by means of a tick box — Signing of the contract by the data subject — Burden of proof)

cjeu_case ·
49870

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 November 2020.#European Union Intellectual Property Office v John Mills Ltd.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Opposition proceedings – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(3) – Scope – Identity or similarity of the mark applied for to the earlier mark – EU word mark MINERAL MAGIC – Application for registration by the agent or representative of the proprietor of the earlier mark – Earlier national word mark MAGIC MINERALS BY JEROME ALEXANDER.#Case C-809/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
49871

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 November 2020.#European Union Intellectual Property Office v John Mills Ltd.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Opposition proceedings – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(3) – Scope – Identity or similarity of the mark applied for to the earlier mark – EU word mark MINERAL MAGIC – Application for registration by the agent or representative of the proprietor of the earlier mark – Earlier national word mark MAGIC MINERALS BY JEROME ALEXANDER.#Case C-809/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
49872

Case C-809/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 November 2020 — European Union Intellectual Property Office v John Mills Ltd, Jerome Alexander Consulting Corp. (Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Opposition proceedings — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(3) — Scope — Identity or similarity of the mark applied for to the earlier mark — EU word mark MINERAL MAGIC — Application for registration by the agent or representative of the proprietor of the earlier mark — Earlier national word mark MAGIC MINERALS BY JEROME ALEXANDER)

cjeu_case ·