Документы: Европейский Союз

45501

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 May 2021.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Spain – Recapitalisation measures to support undertakings that are systemic and strategic for the Spanish economy in response to the COVID-19 pandemic – Decision not to raise any objections – Temporary Framework for State aid – Measure aimed at remedying a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State – Measure aimed at the whole of the economy of a Member State – Principle of non-discrimination – Freedom to provide services and freedom of establishment – Proportionality – Criterion requiring that the beneficiaries of the aid are established in Spain – Failure to weigh the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition – Article 107(3)(b) TFEU – Concept of ‘aid scheme’ – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-628/20.

cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.

45502

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 May 2021.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Spain – Recapitalisation measures to support undertakings that are systemic and strategic for the Spanish economy in response to the COVID-19 pandemic – Decision not to raise any objections – Temporary Framework for State aid – Measure aimed at remedying a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State – Measure aimed at the whole of the economy of a Member State – Principle of non-discrimination – Freedom to provide services and freedom of establishment – Proportionality – Criterion requiring that the beneficiaries of the aid are established in Spain – Failure to weigh the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition – Article 107(3)(b) TFEU – Concept of ‘aid scheme’ – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-628/20.

cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.

45503

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 May 2021.#Müller GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark TIER SHOP – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Interest in bringing proceedings – Obligation to state reasons – Article 72(4) and the first sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-535/20.

cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.

45504

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 May 2021.#Müller GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark TIER SHOP – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Interest in bringing proceedings – Obligation to state reasons – Article 72(4) and the first sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-535/20.

cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.

45505

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 May 2021.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Portuguese air transport market – Aid provided by Portugal to TAP owing to the COVID-19 pandemic – State loan – Decision not to raise any objections – Point 22 of the Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty – Company belonging to a group – Intrinsic difficulties not resulting from an arbitrary allocation of costs within the group – Difficulties which are too serious to be dealt with by the group itself – Duty to state reasons – Maintenance of the effects of the decision.#Case T-465/20.

cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.

45506

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 May 2021.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Portuguese air transport market – Aid provided by Portugal to TAP owing to the COVID-19 pandemic – State loan – Decision not to raise any objections – Point 22 of the Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty – Company belonging to a group – Intrinsic difficulties not resulting from an arbitrary allocation of costs within the group – Difficulties which are too serious to be dealt with by the group itself – Duty to state reasons – Maintenance of the effects of the decision.#Case T-465/20.

cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.

45507

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 May 2021.#Yongkang Kugooo Technology Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark kugoo – Earlier EU and national word marks KUGA and earlier EU word mark KUGA ENERGI – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-324/20.

cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.

45508

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 May 2021.#Yongkang Kugooo Technology Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark kugoo – Earlier EU and national word marks KUGA and earlier EU word mark KUGA ENERGI – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-324/20.

cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.

45509

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 May 2021.#Steinel GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark GluePro – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-256/20.

cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.

45510

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 May 2021.#Steinel GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark GluePro – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-256/20.

cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.

45511

Case T-643/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2021 — Ryanair v Commission (KLM; Covid-19) (State aid — Netherlands — State guarantee for loans and subordinated loan by the State to KLM amid the COVID-19 pandemic — Temporary Framework for State aid measures — Decision not to raise any objections — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — Aid granted previously to another company in the same group of companies — Duty to state reasons — Maintenance of the effects of the decision)

cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.

45512

Case T-628/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2021 — Ryanair v Commission (Spain; Covid-19) (State aid — Spain — Recapitalisation measures to support undertakings that are systemic and strategic for the Spanish economy in response to the COVID-19 pandemic — Decision not to raise any objections — Temporary Framework for State aid — Measure aimed at remedying a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State — Measure aimed at the whole of the economy of a Member State — Principle of non-discrimination — Freedom to provide services and freedom of establishment — Proportionality — Criterion requiring that the beneficiaries of the aid are established in Spain — Failure to weigh the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition — Article 107(3)(b) TFEU — Concept of ‘aid scheme’ — Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.

45513

Case T-535/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2021 — Müller v EUIPO (TIER SHOP) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark TIER SHOP — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Interest in bringing proceedings — Obligation to state reasons — Article 72(4) and the first sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.

45514

Case T-465/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2021 — Ryanair v Commission (TAP; Covid-19) (State aid — Portuguese air transport market — Aid provided by Portugal to TAP owing to the COVID-19 pandemic — State loan — Decision not to raise any objections — Point 22 of the Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty — Company belonging to a group — Intrinsic difficulties not resulting from an arbitrary allocation of costs within the group — Difficulties which are too serious to be dealt with by the group itself — Duty to state reasons — Maintenance of the effects of the decision)

cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.

45515

Case T-324/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2021 — Yongkang Kugooo Technology v EUIPO — Ford Motor Company (kugoo) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark kugoo — Earlier EU and national word marks KUGA and earlier EU word mark KUGA ENERGI — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.

45516

Case T-256/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2021 — Steinel v EUIPO (GluePro) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark GluePro — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.

45517

Case C-1/20: Order of the President of the Court of 19 May 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — B v Finanzamt Österreich, formerly Finanzamt Wien 9/18/19

cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.

45518

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 May 2021.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark representing a bounding feline – Earlier international figurative marks representing a bounding feline – Relative ground for refusal – No injury to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-510/19.

cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.

45519

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 May 2021.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark representing a bounding feline – Earlier international figurative marks representing a bounding feline – Relative ground for refusal – No injury to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-510/19.

cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.

45520

Case T-510/19: Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2021 — Puma v EUIPO — Gemma Group (Representation of a bounding feline) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark representing a bounding feline — Earlier international figurative marks representing a bounding feline — Relative ground for refusal — No injury to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.