Документы: Европейский Союз

43961

Case T-488/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — Guerlain v EUIPO (Shape of an oblong, tapered and cylindrical lipstick) (EU trade mark — Application for registration of a three-dimensional EU trade mark — Shape of an oblong, tapered and cylindrical lipstick — Absolute ground for refusal — Distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 14 июля 2021 г.

43962

Case T-399/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — Cole Haan v EUIPO — Samsøe & Samsøe Holding (Ø) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Ø — Earlier international figurative mark φ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 14 июля 2021 г.

43963

Case T-389/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — KO v Commission (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Remuneration — Expatriation allowance — Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Refusal to grant the expatriation allowance — Habitual residence — Period of training)

cjeu_case · 14 июля 2021 г.

43964

Case T-297/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — Fashioneast and AM.VI. v EUIPO — Moschillo (RICH JOHN RICHMOND) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark RICH JOHN RICHMOND — Absence of genuine use of a trade mark — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Use in a form differing in elements which alter the distinctive character of the mark — Point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 18(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 14 июля 2021 г.

43965

Case T-197/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — JT v EUIPO — Carrasco Pirard (QUILAPAYÚN) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark QUILAPAYÚN — Relative ground for refusal — No well-known mark within the meaning of Article 6bis of the Paris Convention — Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case · 14 июля 2021 г.

43966

Case T-182/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — Griba v CPVO (Gala Perathoner) (Plant varieties — Application for a Community plant variety right for the Gala Perathoner apple variety — Technical examination — Testing location — Equal treatment — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case · 14 июля 2021 г.

43967

Case T-181/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — Griba v CPVO (Stark Gugger) (Plant varieties — Application for a Community plant variety right for the Stark Gugger apple variety — Technical examination — Testing location — Equal treatment — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case · 14 июля 2021 г.

43968

Case T-172/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — Rochefort v Parliament (Law governing the institutions — Rules on expenses and allowances for Members of Parliament — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of sums unduly paid — Burden of proof — Duty to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Error of law — Error of assessment — Proportionality)

cjeu_case · 14 июля 2021 г.

43969

Case T-171/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — Rochefort v Parliament (Law governing the institutions — Rules on expenses and allowances for Members of Parliament — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of sums unduly paid — Burden of proof — Duty to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Error of law — Error of assessment — Proportionality)

cjeu_case · 14 июля 2021 г.

43970

Case T-170/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — Rochefort v Parliament (Law governing the institutions — Rules on expenses and allowances for Members of Parliament — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of sums unduly paid — Burden of proof — Duty to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Error of law — Error of assessment — Proportionality)

cjeu_case · 14 июля 2021 г.

43971

Case T-119/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — IN v EISMEA (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Fixed-term contract — Decision not to renew — Appraisal — Right to be heard — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Manifest error of assessment — Reasonable time — Liability — Non-material damage)

cjeu_case · 14 июля 2021 г.

43972

Case T-75/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — Abitron Germany v EUIPO — Hetronic International (NOVA) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark NOVA — Non-registered earlier national trade mark NOVA — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, respectively) — Reference to the national law governing the earlier mark — Absolute ground for refusal — No bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001))

cjeu_case · 14 июля 2021 г.

43973

Case T-65/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — Kneissl Holding v EUIPO — LS 9 (KNEISSL) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark KNEISSL — Partial revocation — No genuine use of the mark — Extent of use — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Rule 22(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 10(3) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Abuse of rights)

cjeu_case · 14 июля 2021 г.

43974

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#Victoria's Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark BODYSECRETS – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – Customary nature – Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (d), and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (d), and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-810/19.

cjeu_case · 14 июля 2021 г.

43975

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#Victoria's Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark BODYSECRETS – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – Customary nature – Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (d), and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (d), and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-810/19.

cjeu_case · 14 июля 2021 г.

43976

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#Interpipe Niko Tube OOO and Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant PAO v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes, of iron or steel, originating in Russia and Ukraine – Interim review – Calculation of the normal value – Selling, general and administrative costs – Sales between related companies – Ordinary course of trade – Single economic entity – Article 2(3), (4) and (6) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Export price – Adjustment – Functions similar to those of an agent working on a commission basis – Article 2(10)(i) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Manifest error of assessment – Methodology different from that used in a previous investigation – Article 11(9) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Legitimate expectations – Rights of the defence.#Case T-716/19.

cjeu_case · 14 июля 2021 г.

43977

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#Interpipe Niko Tube OOO and Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant PAO v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes, of iron or steel, originating in Russia and Ukraine – Interim review – Calculation of the normal value – Selling, general and administrative costs – Sales between related companies – Ordinary course of trade – Single economic entity – Article 2(3), (4) and (6) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Export price – Adjustment – Functions similar to those of an agent working on a commission basis – Article 2(10)(i) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Manifest error of assessment – Methodology different from that used in a previous investigation – Article 11(9) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Legitimate expectations – Rights of the defence.#Case T-716/19.

cjeu_case · 14 июля 2021 г.

43978

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#Fernando Carbajo Ferrero v European Parliament.#Civil service – Officials – Procedure of appointment to a director’s post – Notice of vacancy – Rejection of the applicant’s application and appointment of another applicant – Obligation to state reasons – Plea of illegality in respect of the measures setting the internal rules of procedure – Irregularity of the recruitment procedure – Manifest error of assessment – Inaccuracy of the information sent to the Appointing Authority – Transparency – Equal treatment – Liability – Material and non-material damage.#Case T-670/19.

cjeu_case · 14 июля 2021 г.

43979

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#Fernando Carbajo Ferrero v European Parliament.#Civil service – Officials – Procedure of appointment to a director’s post – Notice of vacancy – Rejection of the applicant’s application and appointment of another applicant – Obligation to state reasons – Plea of illegality in respect of the measures setting the internal rules of procedure – Irregularity of the recruitment procedure – Manifest error of assessment – Inaccuracy of the information sent to the Appointing Authority – Transparency – Equal treatment – Liability – Material and non-material damage.#Case T-670/19.

cjeu_case · 14 июля 2021 г.

43980

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#Nike European Operations Netherlands BV and Converse Netherlands BV v European Commission.#State aid – Aid implemented by the Netherlands in favour of Nike – Tax rulings – Decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure – Arm’s length principle – Advantage – Selective nature – Equal treatment – Good administration – Inadequate preliminary examination – Serious difficulties – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-648/19.

cjeu_case · 14 июля 2021 г.