Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161334) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43198) directive (8067)
316 913 документов
25545

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 September 2023.#Romaqua Group SA v Societatea Națională Apele Minerale and Agenția Națională pentru Resurse Minerale.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 102 and 106 TFEU – Public undertakings – Freedom to conduct a business – Freedom of establishment – Undertaking that is wholly owned by a Member State and holds exclusive concessions for the exploitation of natural mineral water following an award without a competitive tendering procedure – National legislation allowing for the unlimited extension of the concession.#Case C-510/22.

cjeu_case ·
25546

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 September 2023.#Romaqua Group SA v Societatea Națională Apele Minerale and Agenția Națională pentru Resurse Minerale.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 102 and 106 TFEU – Public undertakings – Freedom to conduct a business – Freedom of establishment – Undertaking that is wholly owned by a Member State and holds exclusive concessions for the exploitation of natural mineral water following an award without a competitive tendering procedure – National legislation allowing for the unlimited extension of the concession.#Case C-510/22.

cjeu_case ·
25547

Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 21 septembre 2023.#Stappert Deutschland GmbH contre Hauptzollamt Hannover.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Union douanière – Règlement (UE) no 952/2013 – Code des douanes de l’Union – Article 60, paragraphe 2 – Acquisition de l’origine des marchandises – Règlement délégué (UE) 2015/2446 – Article 32 – Marchandises dans la production desquelles interviennent plusieurs pays ou territoires – Annexe 22-01 – Règle primaire applicable aux marchandises relevant de la sous-position 7304 41 du système harmonisé – Notion de “profilé creux” – “Ébauches de tube” en acier relevant de la sous-position 7304 49 du système harmonisé, obtenues par formage à chaud et permettant la production de tubes en acier par formage à froid, relevant de la sous-position 7304 41 du système harmonisé – Validité de la règle primaire.#Affaire C-210/22.

cjeu_case ·
25548

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 September 2023.#Stappert Deutschland GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hannover.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Union Customs Code – Article 60(2) – Acquisition of origin of goods – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 – Article 32 – Goods the production of which involves more than one country or territory – Annex 22-01 – Primary rule applicable to goods under subheading 7304 41 of the Harmonised System – Concept of ‘hollow profile’ – Steel ‘tube blanks’ under subheading 7304 49 of the Harmonised System, obtained by hot-forming and enabling the production of steel tubes by cold forming, under subheading 7304 41 of the Harmonised System – Validity of the primary rule.#Case C-210/22.

cjeu_case ·
25549

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 September 2023.#Ministerio Fiscal v Juan.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant – Grounds for non-execution – Point 2 of Article 3 – Principle ne bis in idem – Concept of ‘same acts’ – Set of concrete circumstances which are inextricably linked together – Fraudulent activities carried out by the requested person in two Member States, through two separate legal entities and to the detriment of different victims.#Case C-164/22.

cjeu_case ·
25550

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 September 2023.#Ministerio Fiscal v Juan.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Nacional.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant – Grounds for non-execution – Point 2 of Article 3 – Principle ne bis in idem – Concept of ‘same acts’ – Set of concrete circumstances which are inextricably linked together – Fraudulent activities carried out by the requested person in two Member States, through two separate legal entities and to the detriment of different victims.#Case C-164/22.

cjeu_case ·
25551

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 September 2023.#S and Others v United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common asylum policy – Eligibility for refugee status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 10(1)(e) and (2) – Reasons for persecution – ‘Political opinion’ – Concept – Political opinions developed in the host Member State – Article 4 – Assessment of the well-founded fear of persecution on account of those political opinions.#Case C-151/22.

cjeu_case ·
25552

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 September 2023.#S and Others v United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common asylum policy – Eligibility for refugee status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 10(1)(e) and (2) – Reasons for persecution – ‘Political opinion’ – Concept – Political opinions developed in the host Member State – Article 4 – Assessment of the well-founded fear of persecution on account of those political opinions.#Case C-151/22.

cjeu_case ·
25553

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 September 2023.#Association Avocats pour la défense des droits des étrangers (ADDE) and Others v Ministre de l'Intérieur.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border control, asylum and immigration – Regulation (EU) 2016/399 – Article 32 – Temporary reintroduction of border control by a Member State at its internal borders – Article 14 – Refusal of entry – Equation of internal borders with external borders – Directive 2008/115/EC – Scope – Article 2(2)(a).#Case C-143/22.

cjeu_case ·
25554

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 September 2023.#Association Avocats pour la défense des droits des étrangers (ADDE) and Others v Ministre de l'Intérieur.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border control, asylum and immigration – Regulation (EU) 2016/399 – Article 32 – Temporary reintroduction of border control by a Member State at its internal borders – Article 14 – Refusal of entry – Equation of internal borders with external borders – Directive 2008/115/EC – Scope – Article 2(2)(a).#Case C-143/22.

cjeu_case ·
25556

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 September 2023.#AM and PM v mBank S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy - Śródmieścia w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Mortgage loan contract index-linked to a foreign currency – Criteria for assessment of whether a conversion clause is unfair – National register of standard business terms which are held to be unlawful – Duty to provide information.#Case C-139/22.

cjeu_case ·
25557

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 21 septembre 2023.#Commission européenne contre République fédérale d'Allemagne.#Manquement d’État – Environnement – Directive 92/43/CEE – Conservation des habitats naturels ainsi que de la faune et de la flore sauvages – Article 4, paragraphe 4, et article 6, paragraphe 1 – Absence de désignation des zones spéciales de conservation – Absence de détermination des objectifs de conservation – Absence ou insuffisance de mesures de conservation – Pratique administrative.#Affaire C-116/22.

cjeu_case ·
25558

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 September 2023.#European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Environment – Directive 92/43/EEC – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Article 4(4) and Article 6(1) – Failure to designate special areas of conservation – Failure to determine conservation objectives – Absence or insufficiency of conservation measures – Administrative practice.#Case C-116/22.

cjeu_case ·
25559

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 September 2023.#Apotheke B. v Bundesamt für Sicherheit im Gesundheitswesen (BASG).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Pharmaceutical and cosmetic products – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Article 77(6) – Article 79(b) – Article 80(b) – Guidelines on Good Distribution Practice of medicinal products for human use (GDP) – Pharmaceutical distribution chain – Holder of a wholesale distribution authorisation obtaining medicinal products from persons who are authorised to supply medicinal products to the public but who do not hold a distribution authorisation and are not exempted from the obligation to have such an authorisation – Concepts of ‘sufficient competent staff’ and ‘responsible person’ – Suspension or withdrawal of the wholesale distribution authorisation.#Case C-47/22.

cjeu_case ·
25560

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 September 2023.#Apotheke B. v Bundesamt für Sicherheit im Gesundheitswesen (BASG).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Pharmaceutical and cosmetic products – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Article 77(6) – Article 79(b) – Article 80(b) – Guidelines on Good Distribution Practice of medicinal products for human use (GDP) – Pharmaceutical distribution chain – Holder of a wholesale distribution authorisation obtaining medicinal products from persons who are authorised to supply medicinal products to the public but who do not hold a distribution authorisation and are not exempted from the obligation to have such an authorisation – Concepts of ‘sufficient competent staff’ and ‘responsible person’ – Suspension or withdrawal of the wholesale distribution authorisation.#Case C-47/22.

cjeu_case ·