15581Order of the Court of 11 October 2023.#Thomas Henry GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-342/23 P.cjeu_case · 11 octobre 2023
15582Order of the Court of 11 October 2023.#Thomas Henry GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case C-342/23 P.cjeu_case · 11 octobre 2023
15583Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 October 2023.#Andres Carlos Martin Rodrigo v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark CALIFORNIA Dreaming by Made in California – Earlier Benelux word mark CALIFORNIA DREAM – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-542/22.cjeu_case · 11 octobre 2023
15584Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 October 2023.#Andres Carlos Martin Rodrigo v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark CALIFORNIA Dreaming by Made in California – Earlier Benelux word mark CALIFORNIA DREAM – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-542/22.cjeu_case · 11 octobre 2023
15585Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 11 October 2023.#QT v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Remuneration – Dependent child allowance – Education allowances – Recovery of sums paid but not due – Lack of competence of the author of the act – Infringement of the limitation period.#Case T-529/22.cjeu_case · 11 octobre 2023
15586Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 11 October 2023.#QT v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Remuneration – Dependent child allowance – Education allowances – Recovery of sums paid but not due – Lack of competence of the author of the act – Infringement of the limitation period.#Case T-529/22.cjeu_case · 11 octobre 2023
15587Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 October 2023.#Deutsche Glasfaser Wholesale GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark brightblue – Earlier EU word mark BLUE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Similarity of the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-516/22.cjeu_case · 11 octobre 2023
15588Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 October 2023.#Deutsche Glasfaser Wholesale GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark brightblue – Earlier EU word mark BLUE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Similarity of the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-516/22.cjeu_case · 11 octobre 2023
15589Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 11 October 2023.#Dr. Rudolf Liebe Nachfolger GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark ayuna LESS IS BEAUTY – Earlier EU word mark AJONA – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-490/22.cjeu_case · 11 octobre 2023
15590Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 11 October 2023.#Dr. Rudolf Liebe Nachfolger GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark ayuna LESS IS BEAUTY – Earlier EU word mark AJONA – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-490/22.cjeu_case · 11 octobre 2023
15591Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 October 2023.#Pascoe pharmazeutische Präparate GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark PASCELMO – Earlier EU word mark PASCOE – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-435/22.cjeu_case · 11 octobre 2023
15592Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 October 2023.#Pascoe pharmazeutische Präparate GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark PASCELMO – Earlier EU word mark PASCOE – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-435/22.cjeu_case · 11 octobre 2023
15593Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 11 October 2023.#Republic of Cyprus v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark GRILLOUMI – Earlier national certification word marks ΧΑΛΛΟΥΜΙ HALLOUMI – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-415/22.cjeu_case · 11 octobre 2023
15594Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 11 October 2023.#Republic of Cyprus v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark GRILLOUMI – Earlier national certification word marks ΧΑΛΛΟΥΜΙ HALLOUMI – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-415/22.cjeu_case · 11 octobre 2023
15595Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 October 2023.#PF v European Parliament.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Open competition PE/AD/260/2021 – Decision not to admit the applicant to the oral tests – Obligation to state reasons – Impartiality – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-317/22.cjeu_case · 11 octobre 2023
15596Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 October 2023.#PF v European Parliament.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Open competition PE/AD/260/2021 – Decision not to admit the applicant to the oral tests – Obligation to state reasons – Impartiality – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-317/22.cjeu_case · 11 octobre 2023
15597Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 October 2023.#Flowbird v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark FLOWBIRD – Earlier EU figurative mark FLOW – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-296/22.cjeu_case · 11 octobre 2023
15598Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 October 2023.#Flowbird v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark FLOWBIRD – Earlier EU figurative mark FLOW – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-296/22.cjeu_case · 11 octobre 2023
15599Case T-542/22: Judgment of the General Court of 11 October 2023 –Martin Rodrigo v EUIPO — Louis Vuitton Malletier (CALIFORNIA Dreaming by Made in California) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark CALIFORNIA Dreaming by Made in California — Earlier Benelux word mark CALIFORNIA DREAM — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 11 octobre 2023
15600Case T-529/22: Judgment of the General Court of 11 October 2023 — QT v EIB (Civil service — EIB staff — Remuneration — Dependent child allowance — Education allowances — Recovery of sums paid but not due — Lack of competence of the author of the act — Infringement of the limitation period)cjeu_case · 11 octobre 2023