1501Case T-77/25: Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2026 – Debonair v EUIPO – Loewe (AOURA) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark AOURA – Earlier EU word mark AURA LOEWE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · March 17, 2026
1502Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 March 2026.#e-motors v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-531/24.cjeu_case · March 17, 2026
1503Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 March 2026.#Samer Al Dibs v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Criterion of ‘leading businessperson operating in Syria’ – Presumption of a link with the regime of Bashar al-Assad – Fall of the regime of Bashar al-Assad – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Right to a fair trial – Right to effective judicial protection – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Right to privacy – Damage to reputation.#Case T-405/24.cjeu_case · March 17, 2026
1504Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 March 2026.#Samer Al Dibs v Council of the European Union.#Case T-405/24.cjeu_case · March 17, 2026
1505Arrêt du Tribunal (quatrième chambre) du 18 mars 2026.#CU contre Service européen pour l'action extérieure.#Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Harcèlement moral – Article 12 bis du statut – Demande d’assistance – Enquête – Rejet de la demande – Article 24 du statut – Principe de bonne administration – Impartialité – Droit d’être entendu – Erreur d’appréciation – Délai raisonnable – Devoir d’assistance – Responsabilité – Préjudice moral.#Affaire T-145/24.cjeu_case · March 17, 2026
1506Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 March 2026.#CU v European External Action Service.#Case T-145/24.cjeu_case · March 17, 2026
1507Case T-531/24: Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2026 – e-motors v EUIPO – Nidec PSA Emotors (EMOTORS) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark EMOTORS – Earlier EU figurative mark e-motors and earlier national word mark emotors – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · March 17, 2026
1508Case T-405/24: Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2026 – Al Dibs v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Criterion of leading businessperson operating in Syria – Presumption of a link with the regime of Bashar al-Assad – Fall of the regime of Bashar Al-Assad – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Right to a fair trial – Right to effective judicial protection – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Right to privacy – Damage to reputation)cjeu_case · March 17, 2026
1509Case T-145/24: Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2026 – CU v EEAS (Civil service – Officials – Psychological harassment – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Investigation – Refusal of the request – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Principle of good administration – Impartiality – Right to be heard – Error of assessment – Reasonable time limit – Duty to provide assistance – Liability – Non-material damage)cjeu_case · March 17, 2026
1510Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 18 March 2026.#Robin Wood - Gewaltfreie Aktionsgemeinschaft für Natur und Umwelt eV and Others v European Commission.#Environment – Aarhus Convention – Rejection of a request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 – Forest management – Activities relating to the production of fuels and bioenergy from forest biomass – Taxonomy – Requirements for technical screening criteria – Article 19 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 – Substantial contribution to climate change mitigation and adaptation – Significant harm to environmental objectives.#Case T-575/22.cjeu_case · March 17, 2026
1511Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 18 March 2026.#Robin Wood - Gewaltfreie Aktionsgemeinschaft für Natur und Umwelt eV and Others v European Commission.#Environment – Aarhus Convention – Rejection of a request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 – Forest management – Activities relating to the production of fuels and bioenergy from forest biomass – Taxonomy – Requirements for technical screening criteria – Article 19 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 – Substantial contribution to climate change mitigation and adaptation – Significant harm to environmental objectives.#Case T-575/22.cjeu_case · March 17, 2026
1512Case T-575/22: Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2026 – Robin Wood and Others v Commission (Environment – Aarhus Convention – Rejection of request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 – Forest management – Activities relating to the production of fuels and bioenergy from forest biomass – Taxonomy – Requirements for technical screening criteria – Article 19 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 – Substantial contribution to climate change mitigation and adaptation – Significant harm to environmental objectives)cjeu_case · March 17, 2026
1513Case T-230/26, Funsch Marzipan: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht München (Germany) made on 17 March 2026 – Funsch Marzipan GmbH v Hauptzollamt Schweinfurtcjeu_case · March 16, 2026
1514Case T-227/26, System Kosmetik Produktionsgesellschaft: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht München (Germany) made on 17 March 2026 – System Kosmetik Produktionsgesellschaft für kosmetische Erzeugnisse mbH v Hauptzollamt Augsburgcjeu_case · March 16, 2026
1515Case T-226/26, System Kosmetik Produktionsgesellschaft: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht München (Germany) made on 17 March 2026 – System Kosmetik Produktionsgesellschaft für kosmetische Erzeugnisse mbH v Hauptzollamt Augsburgcjeu_case · March 16, 2026
1516Case T-225/26, Flightright: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) made on 17 March 2026 – Flightright GmbH v Ryanair DACcjeu_case · March 16, 2026
1517Case T-224/26, Vueling Airlines: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) made on 17 March 2026 – Vueling Airlines SA v Flightright GmbHcjeu_case · March 16, 2026
1518Case T-222/26, Ryanair: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) made on 17 March 2026 – Ryanair DAC v CJ and Otherscjeu_case · March 16, 2026
1520Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 March 2026.#Banco Santander, SA v European Central Bank.#Case T-610/24.cjeu_case · March 16, 2026