Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
14621

Case T-297/22: Judgment of the General Court of 6 December 2023 — BB Services v EUIPO — Lego Juris (Shape of a toy figure with a protrusion on its head) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Three-dimensional EU trade mark — Shape of a toy figure with a protrusion on its head — Absolute grounds for invalidity — Sign consisting exclusively of the shape which results from the nature of the goods themselves — Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result — Article 7(1)(e)(i) and (ii) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(e)(i) and (ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
14623

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 December 2023.#QI v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Psychological harassment – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Refusal of request – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Prima facie evidence – Principle of sound administration – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Right to be heard – Error of assessment – Liability.#Case T-807/21.

cjeu_case ·
14624

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 December 2023.#QI v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Psychological harassment – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Refusal of request – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Prima facie evidence – Principle of sound administration – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Right to be heard – Error of assessment – Liability.#Case T-807/21.

cjeu_case ·
14629

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 December 2023.#Mdr Inversiones, SL and Espacio Activos Financieros, SL v European Commission.#Action for annulment – State aid – Aid granted by the Spanish authorities to certain economic interest groupings (EIGs) and to their investors – Tax system applicable to certain finance leasing agreements for the acquisition of ships (Spanish Tax Lease System) – Decision declaring the aid partly incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery in part – Subject matter of the dispute ceasing to exist in part – No need to adjudicate in part – Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Joined Cases T-488/14 and T-489/14.

cjeu_case ·
14630

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 December 2023.#Mdr Inversiones, SL and Espacio Activos Financieros, SL v European Commission.#Action for annulment – State aid – Aid granted by the Spanish authorities to certain economic interest groupings (EIGs) and to their investors – Tax system applicable to certain finance leasing agreements for the acquisition of ships (Spanish Tax Lease System) – Decision declaring the aid partly incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery in part – Subject matter of the dispute ceasing to exist in part – No need to adjudicate in part – Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Joined Cases T-488/14 and T-489/14.

cjeu_case ·
14631

Joined Cases T-488/14 and T-489/14: Order of the General Court of 6 December 2023 — Mdr Inversiones and Espacio Activos Financieros v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Aid granted by the Spanish authorities to certain economic interest groupings (EIGs) and to their investors — Tax system applicable to certain finance leasing agreements for the acquisition of ships (Spanish Tax Lease System) — Decision declaring the aid partly incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery in part — Subject matter of the dispute ceasing to exist in part — No need to adjudicate in part — Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case ·
14639

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 December 2023.#Nordic Info BV v Belgische Staat.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2004/38/EC – Articles 27 and 29 – Measures restricting the free movement of Union citizens on public health grounds – Measure of general application – National legislation providing for a ban on leaving the national territory in order to engage in non-essential travel to Member States classified as high-risk zones in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and an obligation for every traveller entering the national territory from one of those Member States to undergo screening tests and to observe quarantine – Schengen Borders Code – Article 23 – Exercise of police powers in the field of public health – Equivalence with the exercise of border checks – Article 25 – Possibility of reintroducing border controls at internal borders in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Controls carried out in a Member State as part of measures prohibiting the crossing of borders for the purpose of engaging in non-essential travel from or to States in the Schengen area classified as high-risk zones in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.#Case C-128/22.

cjeu_case ·
14640

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 December 2023.#Nordic Info BV v Belgische Staat.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2004/38/EC – Articles 27 and 29 – Measures restricting the free movement of Union citizens on public health grounds – Measure of general application – National legislation providing for a ban on leaving the national territory in order to engage in non-essential travel to Member States classified as high-risk zones in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and an obligation for every traveller entering the national territory from one of those Member States to undergo screening tests and to observe quarantine – Schengen Borders Code – Article 23 – Exercise of police powers in the field of public health – Equivalence with the exercise of border checks – Article 25 – Possibility of reintroducing border controls at internal borders in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Controls carried out in a Member State as part of measures prohibiting the crossing of borders for the purpose of engaging in non-essential travel from or to States in the Schengen area classified as high-risk zones in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.#Case C-128/22.

cjeu_case ·