Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
14081

Case C-75/23, Parchetul de pe lângă Tribunalul Braşov: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Braşov — Romania) — Criminal proceedings against M.A.sr, S.A.C.S., S.A.S. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Acte éclairé — Identical questions — Protection of the financial interests of the European Union — Article 325(1) TFEU — PFI Convention — Article 2(1) — Obligation to counter fraud affecting the financial interests of the European Union by taking effective deterrent measures — Obligation to provide for criminal penalties — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Serious VAT fraud — Limitation period for criminal liability — Judgment of a constitutional court which had invalidated a national provision governing the reasons for interrupting that period — Systemic risk of impunity — Protection of fundamental rights — Article 49(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Principle that offences and penalties must be defined by law — Requirements of foreseeability and precision of criminal law — Principle of the retroactive application of the more lenient criminal law (lex mitior) — Principle of legal certainty — National standard of protection of fundamental rights — Duty on the courts of a Member State to disapply judgments of the constitutional court and/or the supreme court of that Member State in the event that they are incompatible with EU law — Disciplinary liability of judges in the event of non-compliance with those judgments — Principle of the primacy of EU law)

cjeu_case ·
14086

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 January 2024.#G. and Others v M.S. and X.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Possibility for the referring court to take account of the preliminary ruling of the Court – Interpretation sought by the referring court necessary to enable it to give judgment – Independence of the judiciary – Conditions for the appointment of judges of the ordinary courts – Possibility of challenging an order which has definitively ruled on an application for the grant of interim measures – Possibility of removing a judge from a panel of judges of the court – Inadmissibility of the requests for a preliminary ruling.#Joined Cases C-181/21 and C-269/21.

cjeu_case ·
14087

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 January 2024.#G. and Others v M.S. and X.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Katowicach and Sąd Okręgowy w Krakowie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Possibility for the referring court to take account of the preliminary ruling of the Court – Interpretation sought by the referring court necessary to enable it to give judgment – Independence of the judiciary – Conditions for the appointment of judges of the ordinary courts – Possibility of challenging an order which has definitively ruled on an application for the grant of interim measures – Possibility of removing a judge from a panel of judges of the court – Inadmissibility of the requests for a preliminary ruling.#Joined Cases C-181/21 and C-269/21.

cjeu_case ·
14088

Joined Cases C-181/21 and C-269/21, G. and Others (Appointment of common law judges in Poland): Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Katowicach and Sąd Okręgowy w Krakowie — Poland) — G. (C-181/21), BC, DC (C-269/21) v M.S. (C-181/21), X (C-269/21) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 267 TFEU — Possibility for the referring court to take account of the preliminary ruling of the Court — Interpretation sought by the referring court necessary to enable it to give judgment — Independence of the judiciary — Conditions for the appointment of judges of the ordinary courts — Possibility of challenging an order which has definitively ruled on a request for the grant of preventative measures — Possibility of removing a judge from a panel of judges of the court — Inadmissibility of the requests for a preliminary ruling)

cjeu_case ·
14093

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 January 2024.#M.M. v Ministero della Difesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 5 – Fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector – Successive contracts – Prohibition on converting fixed-term contracts to open-ended contracts – Teaching non-military subjects in military schools.#Case C-278/23.

cjeu_case ·
14094

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 January 2024.#M.M. v Ministero della Difesa.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 5 – Fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector – Successive contracts – Prohibition on converting fixed-term contracts to open-ended contracts – Teaching non-military subjects in military schools.#Case C-278/23.

cjeu_case ·
14095

Case C-278/83, Biltena: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy) — M.M., acting as successor in title to M.R. v Ministero della Difesa (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Directive 1999/70/EC — Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Clause 5 — Fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector — Successive contracts — Prohibition on converting fixed-term contracts to open-ended contracts — Teaching non-military subjects in military schools)

cjeu_case ·