13781Joined Cases C-810/21 to C-813/21, Caixabank (Limitation period for the repayment of mortgage charges): Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 January 2024 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona — Spain) — Caixabank SA, formerly Bankia SA (C-810/21), Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA (C-811/21), Banco Santander SA (C-812/21), OK, PI (C- 813/21) v WE, XA (C-810/21), TB, UK (C-811/21), OG (C-812/21), Banco Sabadell SA (C-813/21) (References for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Charges arising from the formalisation of the mortgage loan agreement — Restitution of the sums paid under a term declared to be unfair — Starting point of the limitation period for an action for restitution)cjeu_case · 25 janvier 2024
13782Case C-687/21, MediaMarktSaturn: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hagen — Germany) — BL v MediaMarktSaturn Hagen-Iserlohn GmbH, formerly known as Saturn Electro-Handelsgesellschaft mbH Hagen (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Interpretation of Articles 5, 24, 32 and 82 — Assessment of the validity of Article 82 — Inadmissibility of the request for an assessment of validity — Right to compensation for damage caused by data processing which infringes that regulation — Transmission of data to an unauthorised third party on account of an error made by the employees of the controller — Assessment of the appropriateness of the protective measures implemented by the controller — Compensatory function fulfilled by the right to compensation — Effect of the severity of the infringement — Whether necessary to establish the existence of damage caused by that infringement — Concept of ‘non-material damage’)cjeu_case · 25 janvier 2024
13783Case T-45/24: Action brought on 24 January 2024 — ePURE and Pannonia Bio v Parliament and Councilcjeu_case · 24 janvier 2024
13784Case C-94/24, Banca Mediolanum – III: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte di giustizia tributaria di secondo grado della Lombardia (Italy) lodged on 24 January 2024 – Banca Mediolanum SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate – Direzione Regionale della Lombardiacjeu_case · 24 janvier 2024
13785Case C-93/24, Banca Mediolanum – II: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte di giustizia tributaria di secondo grado della Lombardia (Italy) lodged on 24 January 2024 – Banca Mediolanum SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate – Direzione Regionale della Lombardiacjeu_case · 24 janvier 2024
13786Case C-92/24, Banca Mediolanum: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte di giustizia tributaria di secondo grado della Lombardia (Italy) lodged on 24 January 2024 – Banca Mediolanum SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate – Direzione Regionale della Lombardiacjeu_case · 24 janvier 2024
13787Case C-45/24, Verein für Konsumenteninformation: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 24 January 2024 – Verein für Konsumenteninformation v Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NVcjeu_case · 24 janvier 2024
13788Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 January 2024.#Tiendanimal Comercio Electronico de Articulos para Mascotas, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark SALVAJE – Earlier national word mark SALVANA – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-55/23.cjeu_case · 24 janvier 2024
13789Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 January 2024.#Tiendanimal Comercio Electronico de Articulos para Mascotas, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark SALVAJE – Earlier national word mark SALVANA – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-55/23.cjeu_case · 24 janvier 2024
13790Case T-55/23: Judgment of the General Court of 24 January 2024 — Tiendanimal v EUIPO — Salvana Tiernahrung (SALVAJE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark SALVAJE — Earlier national word mark SALVANA — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 24 janvier 2024
13791Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 21 June 2023.#Delta Sport Handelskontor GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a building block from a toy building set – Cross-claim – Request for alteration – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility.#Case T-537/22.cjeu_case · 24 janvier 2024
13792Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 January 2024.#U.I. Lapp GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark labkable Solutions for cables – Earlier EU figurative marks LAPP KABEL STUTTGART and LAPP KABEL and earlier word mark LAPP – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-636/22.cjeu_case · 24 janvier 2024
13793Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 January 2024.#U.I. Lapp GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark labkable Solutions for cables – Earlier EU figurative marks LAPP KABEL STUTTGART and LAPP KABEL and earlier word mark LAPP – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-636/22.cjeu_case · 24 janvier 2024
13794Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 January 2024.#Agus sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark ROYAL MILK – Genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use ‘in respect of some of the goods or services’ – Article 58(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Determination of an independent subcategory of goods.#Case T-603/22.cjeu_case · 24 janvier 2024
13795Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 January 2024.#Agus sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark ROYAL MILK – Genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use ‘in respect of some of the goods or services’ – Article 58(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Determination of an independent subcategory of goods.#Case T-603/22.cjeu_case · 24 janvier 2024
13796Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 January 2024.#Veneziana Energia Risorse Idriche Territorio Ambiente Servizi SpA (Veritas) v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Document disclosed in the context of an EU Pilot procedure concerning the repayment of VAT – Document originating from a Member State – Refusal to grant access – Prior agreement of the Member State – Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-602/22.cjeu_case · 24 janvier 2024
13797Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 January 2024.#Veneziana Energia Risorse Idriche Territorio Ambiente Servizi SpA (Veritas) v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Document disclosed in the context of an EU Pilot procedure concerning the repayment of VAT – Document originating from a Member State – Refusal to grant access – Prior agreement of the Member State – Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-602/22.cjeu_case · 24 janvier 2024
13798Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 January 2024.#Noah Clothing LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark NOAH – Genuine use of the mark – Nature of use – Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a), and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 19(1) and Article 10(7) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Right to be heard.#Case T-562/22.cjeu_case · 24 janvier 2024
13799Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 January 2024.#Noah Clothing LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark NOAH – Genuine use of the mark – Nature of use – Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a), and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 19(1) and Article 10(7) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Right to be heard.#Case T-562/22.cjeu_case · 24 janvier 2024
13800Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 24 January 2024.#Delta-Sport Handelskontor GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered community design representing a building block from a toy building set – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Features of appearance of a product to be necessarily reproduced in their exact form and dimensions in order to permit the interconnection with other products – Designs whose purpose is to allow multiple assembly or connection of mutually interchangeable products within a modular system – Article 8(1) to (3) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-537/22.cjeu_case · 24 janvier 2024