Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
12321

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 April 2024.#Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) v College voor de toelating van gewasbeschermingsmiddelen en biociden.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Authorisation for placing plant protection products on the market – Examination for authorisation – Article 4 – Article 29 – Conditions – No harmful effect – Criteria – Endocrine disrupting properties – Regulation (EU) 2018/605 – Precautionary principle – Current scientific and technical knowledge.#Joined Cases C-309/22 and C-310/22.

cjeu_case ·
12322

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 April 2024.#Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) v College voor de toelating van gewasbeschermingsmiddelen en biociden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Marketing authorisation for plant protection products – Examination for authorisation – Article 36 – Discretion of the Member State concerned, for the purposes of Article 36(2), with regard to the scientific risk assessment carried out by the Member State examining the application for authorisation under Article 36(1) – Article 44 – Withdrawal or amendment of an authorisation – Precautionary principle – Effective judicial remedy – Current scientific and technical knowledge.#Case C-308/22.

cjeu_case ·
12323

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 April 2024.#Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) v College voor de toelating van gewasbeschermingsmiddelen en biociden.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Marketing authorisation for plant protection products – Examination for authorisation – Article 36 – Discretion of the Member State concerned, for the purposes of Article 36(2), with regard to the scientific risk assessment carried out by the Member State examining the application for authorisation under Article 36(1) – Article 44 – Withdrawal or amendment of an authorisation – Precautionary principle – Effective judicial remedy – Current scientific and technical knowledge.#Case C-308/22.

cjeu_case ·
12324

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 April 2024.#Peter Sweetman v An Bord Pleanála and Ireland and the Attorney General.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2000/60/EC – Framework for EU action in the field of water policy – Article 4(1)(a) – Environmental objectives relating to surface water – Obligation of the Member States not to authorise a project which may cause a deterioration of the status of a surface water body – Article 5 and Annex II – Characterisation of surface water body types – Article 8 and Annex V – Classification of surface water status – Article 11 – Programme of measures – Project for the abstraction of water from a lake with a surface area below 0.5 km².#Case C-301/22.

cjeu_case ·
12325

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 April 2024.#Peter Sweetman v An Bord Pleanála and Ireland and the Attorney General.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2000/60/EC – Framework for EU action in the field of water policy – Article 4(1)(a) – Environmental objectives relating to surface water – Obligation of the Member States not to authorise a project which may cause a deterioration of the status of a surface water body – Article 5 and Annex II – Characterisation of surface water body types – Article 8 and Annex V – Classification of surface water status – Article 11 – Programme of measures – Project for the abstraction of water from a lake with a surface area below 0.5 km².#Case C-301/22.

cjeu_case ·
12326

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 April 2024.#Edil Work 2 S.r.l. and S.T. S.r.l v STE S.a.r.l.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 49 and 54 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Company established in a Member State but carrying on its activities in another Member State – Operation and management of the company – National legislation providing for the application of the law of the Member State in which a company carries on its activities – Restriction on the freedom of establishment – Justification – Protection of the interests of creditors, minority shareholders and staff – Prevention of abusive practices and artificial arrangements – Proportionality.#Case C-276/22.

cjeu_case ·
12327

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 April 2024.#Edil Work 2 Srl. and S.T. Srl v STE Sàrl.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 49 and 54 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Company established in a Member State but carrying on its activities in another Member State – Operation and management of the company – National legislation providing for the application of the law of the Member State in which a company carries on its activities – Restriction on the freedom of establishment – Justification – Protection of the interests of creditors, minority shareholders and staff – Prevention of abusive practices and artificial arrangements – Proportionality.#Case C-276/22.

cjeu_case ·
12328

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 25 April 2024.#Casino de Spa SA and Others v État belge (SPF Finances).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 135(1)(i) – Exemptions – Betting, lotteries and other forms of gambling – Conditions and limits – Principle of fiscal neutrality – Maintenance of the effects of a piece of national legislation – Entitlement to refund – Unjust enrichment – State aid – Article 107(1) TFEU – Application for a refund of the tax in the form of damages.#Case C-741/22.

cjeu_case ·
12329

Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 25 April 2024.#Compass Banca SpA v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2005/29/EC – Article 2(j), Articles 5, 8 and 9 – Concept of ‘average consumer’ – Unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices – Concept of ‘aggressive commercial practice’ – Cross-selling of a personal loan and an insurance product not related to that loan – Orientation of the information provided to the consumer – Concept of ‘framing’ – Commercial practice consisting of simultaneously proposing to a consumer an offer for a personal loan and an offer for an insurance product not related to that loan – No cooling-off period between the signature of the loan contract and that of the insurance policy contract – Directive (EU) 2016/97 – Article 24.#Case C-646/22.

cjeu_case ·
12330

Joined Cases C-684/22 to C 686/22,  Stadt Duisburg (Loss of German nationality: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 April 2024 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Düsseldorf - Germany) – S.Ö. (C-684/22), N.Ö., M.Ö. (C-685/22), M.S., S.S. (C-686/22) v Stadt Duisburg (C-684/22), Stadt Wuppertal (C-685/22) and Stadt Krefeld (C-686/22) (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Article 20 TFEU – Nationality of a Member State and of a third country – Acquisition of the nationality of a third country – Loss of the nationality of a Member State and of citizenship of the Union by operation of law – Possibility of applying to retain the nationality of the Member State prior to acquisition of the nationality of a third country – Individual examination of the consequences of the loss of the nationality of the Member State in the light of EU law – Scope)

cjeu_case ·
12331

Case C-657/22,  Bitulpetrolium Serv: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 April 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Prahova - Romania) – SC Bitulpetrolium Serv SRL v Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Prahova – Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Ploieşti (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation of energy products and electricity – Directive 2003/96/EC – Taxation in accordance with the principle of actual use of those products – Annex I – Minimum levels of taxation applicable to energy products provided for by that directive – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 2(1)(a) – Chargeable event – Article 63 – Chargeability of VAT – Article 78(1)(a) – Taxable amount – Reintroduction of energy products into the tax warehouse – Conditions imposed by national law – Additional excise duty and VAT applied as a penalty for non-compliance with those conditions – Principle of proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
12332

Joined Cases C-420/22 and C-528/22,  NW (Classified information): Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 April 2024 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Szegedi Törvényszék - Hungary) – NW (C-420/22), PQ (C-528/22) v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság, Miniszterelnöki Kabinetirodát vezető miniszter (References for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the European Union – Article 20 TFEU – Union citizen who has never exercised his or her right of freedom of movement – Residence of a family member of that Union citizen – Threat to national security – Statement by a specialist national authority – Statement of reasons – Access to the file)

cjeu_case ·
12334

Joined Cases C-309/22 and C-310/22,  PAN Europe (Assessment of endocrine disrupting properties): Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 April 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven – Netherlands) – Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) v College voor de toelating van gewasbeschermingsmiddelen en biociden (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Authorisation for placing plant protection products on the market – Examination for authorisation – Article 4 – Article 29 – Conditions – No harmful effect – Criteria – Endocrine disrupting properties – Regulation (EU) 2018/605 – Precautionary principle – Current scientific and technical knowledge)

cjeu_case ·
12335

Case C-308/22, PAN Europe (Closer): Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 April 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven – Netherlands) – Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) v College voor de toelating van gewasbeschermingsmiddelen en biociden (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Authorisation for placing plant protection products on the market – Examination for authorisation – Article 36 – Discretion of the Member State concerned, for the purposes of Article 36(2), with regard to the scientific risk assessment carried out by the Member State examining the application for authorisation under Article 36(1) – Article 44 – Withdrawal or amendment of an authorisation – Precautionary principle – Effective judicial remedy – Current scientific and technical knowledge)

cjeu_case ·
12336

Case C-301/22,  Sweetman: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 April 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland) – Ireland) – Peter Sweetman v An Bord Pleanála, Ireland and the Attorney General (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2000/60/EC – Framework for EU action in the field of water policy – Article 4(1)(a) – Environmental objectives relating to surface waters – Obligation of the Member States not to authorise a project which may cause a deterioration of the status of a surface water body – Article 5 and Annex II – Characterisation of surface water body types – Article 8 and Annex V – Classification of surface water status – Article 11 – Programme of measures – Project for the abstraction of water from a lake with a surface area below 0.5km²)

cjeu_case ·
12337

Case C-276/22, Edil Work 2 and S.T.: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 April 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione – Italy) – Edil Work 2 Srl, S.T. Srl v STE Sàrl (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 49 and 54 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Company established in a Member State but carrying on its activities in another Member State – Operation and management of the company – National legislation providing for the application of the law of the Member State in which a company carries on its activities – Restriction on freedom of establishment – Justification – Protection of the interests of creditors, minority shareholders and staff – Prevention of abusive practices and artificial arrangements – Proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
12338

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 April 2024.#GP and BG v Banco Santander, SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/CEE – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Mortgage loan agreement – Clause providing for the payment of costs relating to the contract to be borne by the consumer – Final judicial decision finding that term unfair and declaring it void – Action for restitution of the sums paid pursuant to the unfair term – Point from which the limitation period for the action for restitution starts to run.#Case C-561/21.

cjeu_case ·
12339

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 April 2024.#GP and BG v Banco Santander, SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/CEE – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Mortgage loan agreement – Clause providing for the payment of costs relating to the contract to be borne by the consumer – Final judicial decision finding that term unfair and declaring it void – Action for restitution of the sums paid pursuant to the unfair term – Point from which the limitation period for the action for restitution starts to run.#Case C-561/21.

cjeu_case ·
12340

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 April 2024.#F C C and M A B v Caixabank SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Mortgage loan contract – Term stipulating that costs relating to the contract are to be paid by the consumer – Final judicial decision finding that term unfair and declaring it void – Action for restitution of the sums paid pursuant to the unfair term – Point from which the limitation period starts to run.#Case C-484/21.

cjeu_case ·